Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
PHE considers that the public health impacts likely to arise from the impact of the development on air, land and water have been adequately considered in the related sections of the...
Read more
-
1. Any major disturbance of any part of an historic landscape is unacceptable.
2. Land could be resumed somewhere "over the hills and far away" to build a by-pass road, so...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the destruction of important archaeological information and finds associated with the area, and the unrepairable damage to the site which has World Heritage Status. Also rare bird...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will cause irreparable harm to the WHS and destroy its archaeology. No sane person can consider this to be acceptable.
-
It's ridiculous to spend so much money on a tunnel, yes the traffic is terrible but there has to be less costly options on the table. I understand it is going to be. very difficult to come up with a...
Read more
-
Mr Robert Turner of Manor Farm, Winterbourne Stoke.
DCO Registration of Interested Parties.
I wish to make full written and oral representations on many aspects of the scheme (an outline of...
Read more
-
I object to a dual carriageway running beside Stonehenge as I feel it would destroy the significance of the historical value of the site.
-
Dear sir/madam,
Please keep Stonehenge intact as it is now. An expressway could damage the site because of the vibrations of constructing it and from the cars especially the heavy ones.. And the view...
Read more
-
I object to the plans for a main road very close to Stonehenge because, in digging the foundations of that road, irreparable damage will be done to any archaeological remains which are below the...
Read more
-
We - Astronumerical Druid Order ADO and Sacred Grove Western Isles SGWI, OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application.
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National...
Read more
-
I strongly feel that the proposals relating to the above scheme are wholly inappropriate for the landscape through which the road will be cutting. Whilst the scheme threatens to irreparably damage the...
Read more
-
It will irreparably damage the archeology of the World Heritage Site
-
I am concerned about the proposal as I think it will destroy this World Heritage Site. It is irreplaceable and is still giving archaeologists information. I also understand that rare birds will be...
Read more
-
I am against the proposed new highway as I believe it will be very damaging to this extremely important site and once spoilt it will be spoilt forever.
UNESCO advisers are quite rightly against this...
Read more
-
1) The build is environmentally sound in relation to the river Till.
2) The realigned cross roads at Rollestone are constructed and open before any other works commence – reason to minimise on the...
Read more
-
The plan to turn the A303 into a under ground dual carriageway that runs close to the Stonehenge site has many flaws. It is ridiculously expensive and cannot give value for money in terms of a return...
Read more
-
I'm very concerned that this tunnel, as proposed, could damage this World Heritage Site and disturb the land.
It's just to risky!
There must be a better way to improve traffic flow.
-
I am very concerned about the proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge because I feel that the construction of such a dual carriageway and tunnel will do irreversible damage to the landscape of the area,...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the loss of one of our most precious cultural assets and its view when I travel along the A303. The stones are the only ones in the world and irreparable damage to the WHS, and its...
Read more
-
Do not do this... Stonehenge was built for a purpose. In alignment with planets and stars also tied to energies within the earth. This place is sacred. Would you bury underneath a cathedral? The...
Read more
-
CPRE Wiltshire Branch objects to the A303 Preferred Route and proposed alterations as an individual charity and as a supporter of the Stonehenge Alliance of NGOs. Our objections, supported by CPRE...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is one of the worlds most recognisable and iconic heritage sites and its setting and landscape are integral to its appreciation. The proposed development would severely impact its setting...
Read more
-
The proposed tunnel roadworks poses a significant threat to the precious cultural heritage of the area and will be detrimental to the aesthetic, cultural and historical values found in the area. I am...
Read more
-
I am very concerned to hear about the proposed expressway on Stonehenge. IT is very disrespectful to the UNESCO international advisors and to thousands of pagans across the country, which place great...
Read more
-
A tunnel is a terrible idea. Not only could you be unwittingly destroying archeological treasures; you would be denying the majority of people who are not rich the iconic sight of the stones in their...
Read more
-
The A303/A30/A358 Improvement Partnership strongly supports the Department for Transport’s ongoing commitment to improving this vital strategic corridor between London and the South West. We welcome...
Read more
-
The area around Stonehenge is an EXTREMELY important World Heritage Site and as such should not be disturbed for any reason.
I personally recommend that this application should be rejected.
-
I don't believe the disruption to the Heritage site and the local roads and villages when the motorists try to find alternative routes would be worth the expense. I think it would be as ridiculous as...
Read more
-
I am concerned about permanent damage to this World Heritage site and the lack of alternative plans that would not cause damage.
Loss of view from the road of Stonehenge monument and people having...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
The planned engineering works would scar the Stonehenge landscape for ever. There would be extensive tunnel cuttings into the chalk for four lanes of tarmac, and massive highway interchanges through...
Read more
-
Concern over the future of the World Heritage Site
-
Hello,
The statements below, to my mind, have not been fully thought out.
• Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
We're are constantly developing new ways to...
Read more
-
I am independent Chair of the Partnership Panel which oversees the management of the Stonehenge and Avebury World Heritage Site. I wish to provide evidence of the risks , benefits and opportunities...
Read more
-
We cannot allow anything to damage our cultural pastudies. Once gone it can not be recreated.
-
As someone who grew up in the area and whose family have been documented in the area as far back as the 16th century, likely earlier, I wish to register my objections to the DCO planning application...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
My representation is made on the following points:
- Concerns that permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
- UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in...
Read more
-
Such a historic UK site should not be interfered with. Other routes surely can be created.
-
UNESCO says no. Stone Curlews say no. The archeology says no. Therefore I am saying no. The only tunnel that should be considered is much longer and you won't pay for it. I cannot believe that there...
Read more
-
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
I wonder how the UK government treats his World Heritage. Stonehenge needs to be protected for the future generation. A massive traffic around the site will destroy...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about damage to Blick Mead which offers a unique opportunity to study the lives of our Mesolithic forbears. It is a site which is rich in finds and is challenging our ideas about...
Read more
-
I am concerned that this ancient and Sacred World Heritage Site will suffer permanent damage.
The sight of this unique stone structure from the road is breathtaking and it is wrong that it should...
Read more
-
My concern is that this would cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting and there are concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
The...
Read more
-
Briefly, the scheme desecrates a UNESCO world heritage site and risk causing irreversible damage to other late mesolithic remains in the area. It is likely that such a scheme would have an adverse...
Read more
-
I have commented throughout the consultation process that the tunnel approach walls should consist of soil filled stacking planters as used extensively in Germany and France. These would soften the...
Read more
-
I firmly believe that Stonehenge is a unique and paramauntly important heritage site for preservation if which we are jointly responsible to the generations that come after us both in this country and...
Read more
-
The proposed highway may cause damage to this World Heritage Site and would certainly increase noise there. They should both be avoided.
-
Our world heritage site should not be compromised in any way. It’s setting and environment are part of what makes it so stunning. UNESCO advisors are against this scheme. Permanent damage to nearby...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed dual carriageway will damage the WHS irreparably. It will involve tunnelling into the ancient monument's surroundings, which MUST contain many artefacts which have...
Read more