Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
the only feasible on-line route [for the A303] which meets the essential requirements of this World Heritage Site, is a long bored tunnel"
I object completely the current and plans.
-
Quite simply, the desiccation of a national monument is a disgrace. Relieving pressure on the A303 at the expense of thousands of years of history cannot be justified.
-
I believe construction of subterranean roads will severely damage the historic site and surrounding area of Stonehenge. There will be disruption to the local area. There is no true justification for...
Read more
-
Dear Sirs,
I am the founding chairman of the Amesbury Museum and Heritage Trust, President of Salisbury Chamber of Commerce, and former Mayor of Amesbury. I am also a highways engineer, with senior...
Read more
-
The damage caused by this proposal to a world heritage site is wholly unacceptable and can never be undone.
-
The proposed motorway through the site of Stonehenge would destroy irreparably both the visual experience of the site and the irreplaceable archaeological materials yet undiscovered in its path.
-
This road as it is currently planned will cause irreparable damage to a site of both national and international importance. The Western portal is too close to the ancient burial mounds and the eastern...
Read more
-
i feel all sacred sites should be protected not developed.
-
I frequently travel down the A303 to work in Wiltshire. I am particularly concerned about irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
I am writing to register my views on the incredibly short term view on behalf of the current plans. When you review the weight of evidence for what you are going to destroy in the name of...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the proposals relating to the A303. The Stonehenge landscape is of international importance. The proposals would cause irreparable damage to the archaeology of this landscape. As a...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient deeply spiritual site which must never be disturbed by mankind.To desecrate it in any manner is reprehensible,a violation against Nature It must not be disturbed by human...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed road plans and tunnel for the following reasons:-
1. The plans are against the UNESCO's advise who state an alternative route be found
2. Damage has already been caused by...
Read more
-
I believe this land should be left in as natural state as possible with as little development nearby as possible leaving the land around and under the site left untouched.
This is a World Heritage...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the proposal for the following reasons:-
- This is a UNESCO site described as a 'landscape without parallel' and I'm concerned that there will be damage to this World...
Read more
-
This application for development, if approved, will destroy archaeological evidence from a time in pre-history that the whole world would benefit from knowing. Just because we don't yet fuly...
Read more
-
I believe the tunnel and attendant works /structures will cause significant and lasting damage to the archaeology and the landscape in which it is located. This is recognised by UNESCO and a wide...
Read more
-
This site is a sacred burial site and I believe that this should not be dug up, tunnelled or interfered with in any way.Please honour that which is sacred.
I believe Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I believe the new infrastructure will be detrimental to our heritage which is already being eaten up by big corporations. The problem seems to be people slowing down in this area I don't understand...
Read more
-
I worry about the Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
Please can I strongly object to the proposed Stonehenge A303 Stonehenge tunnel etc for the following reasons:
It will seriously damage Blick Mead (BM). The current excavations are smaller than the...
Read more
-
I object to this application on the basis that:
1. There is insufficient there were not be lasting and irreversible damage to an historically unique site. One that is indisputably World Heritage and...
Read more
-
I wish to express my interest against a dual carriageway across the World Heritage site, therefore causing massive damage to the site, its archaeology and setting as well as to any nearby habitats of...
Read more
-
I do not believe the proposed tunnel will be to the longterm benefit if Stonhenge and the surrounding archaeology. Damage at the blick mead site is already apparent even at this early stage of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site and should be protected from Irreparable damage to its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say...
Read more
-
“I OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application."
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National Infrastructure Commission, Office of Road & Rail and National Audit...
Read more
-
A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down Improvement Scheme
DCO Relevant Representation
Acting on behalf of Berwick Down Ltd (BDL) I wish to register as an Interested Party in respect of the above...
Read more
-
Our group supports the current HE plans which are to be examined by the inspectorate. We wish to be able to attend preliminary meetings or hearings that may be of particular interest to us so we can...
Read more
-
I object to the destruction of the Stonehenge area, it should be held as a precious monument to our ancient cultural heritage and therfore left undisturbed in order to be appreciated by coming...
Read more
-
Acting on behalf of Biddesden House Farm Partnership (BHFP) I wish to register as an Interested Party in respect of the above application for Development Consent by Highways England. BHFP own the...
Read more
-
1. If the project goes ahead it will result in permanent damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting including damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting, therefore...
Read more
-
My representation will (yet again - why have the great number of previous representations been ignored!!!!!!) draw attention to the irreparable damage the proposed tunnel ***and its approaches** will...
Read more
-
Its wrong to be digging up ancient burial sites, there's a lot to learn from Stonehenge still, there are still many undiscovered relics, burials, sites and facts still to learn. Its Britain's richest...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed scheme on the grounds that it UNESCO deems that the tunnel in its current proposed form is 'Not adequate to protect the authenticity, integrity and Outstanding Universal Value...
Read more
-
I believe the scheme is not necessary in its present form.
Putting the dual carriageway in a cutting would take the view of traffic away from the stones and it would save a great deal of cost.
It...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is part of the heritage of these islands. It is as near to Sacred Ground as can be found in Britain. The work already carried out has, it seems, already caused damage underground and...
Read more
-
The irreparable damage to Stonehenge and the site in general - it's bad enough having a main road sited near it
The impression it gives to visitors that this isn't a site treated with any...
Read more
-
I am horrified by the proposal to cut through land which is of the greatest archaeological and historical importance in order to shave off a few minutes from journeys by car. Stonehenge and its...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed developments due to the permanent and irreversible damage that will happen to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. The entire area is an area of extreme...
Read more
-
The planned engineering works would scar the Stonehenge landscape for ever. There would be extensive tunnel cuttings into the chalk for four lanes of tarmac, and massive highway interchanges through...
Read more
-
The main points I am concerened about: Tunnelling or other building work under or around the site will destroy a unique archealogical...
Read more
-
I am writing to register my strong objection to the proposed tunnel at Stonehenge. The proposed tunnel would be highly damaging to the unique and historic landscape around Stonehenge and sites of...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the loss of a precious cultural asset, the classic view of the stones, at the hands of the very bodies entrusted with its protection.
The distant prospect of the stones from the...
Read more
-
The proposed road development will - as UNESCO has pointed out - endanger one of the most important landscapes of its kind anywhere in the world, potentially destroying invaluable archaeology.
It...
Read more
-
I am strongly opposed to the proposed measures. Stonehenge is one of the most incredible locations and historical monuments and this jeopardises it needlessly and would be a national embarrassment.
-
I am very unhappy at the plans for The tunnel at Stonehenge. The destruction of a globally important ancient landscape for what will be temporary easing of traffic seems to be very short sighted.
-
I am concerned about damage to the stone henge site, its archaeology and setting.
I read that UNESCO’s advisers say the scheme should not go ahead and do not trust this government to protect...
Read more
-
I believe the tunnel and associated construction works will have a massive detrimental effect on the archaeology of the area and must be stopped at all costs
-
I feel the Western portal is too close to the ancient burial mounds and the Eastern too close to 'Blickmead' Archaeological site, and that there are issues with light pollution to the west and water...
Read more
-
In my view the proposals for the A303 will cause irreparable damage to Stonehenge which is an ancient site with World Heritage Site status. This and the views of UNESCO should be taken seriously as...
Read more