Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
the only feasible on-line route [for the A303] which meets the essential requirements of this World Heritage Site, is a long bored tunnel"
I object completely the current and plans.
-
Quite simply, the desiccation of a national monument is a disgrace. Relieving pressure on the A303 at the expense of thousands of years of history cannot be justified.
-
I believe construction of subterranean roads will severely damage the historic site and surrounding area of Stonehenge. There will be disruption to the local area. There is no true justification for...
Read more
-
Dear Sirs,
I am the founding chairman of the Amesbury Museum and Heritage Trust, President of Salisbury Chamber of Commerce, and former Mayor of Amesbury. I am also a highways engineer, with senior...
Read more
-
The damage caused by this proposal to a world heritage site is wholly unacceptable and can never be undone.
-
The proposed motorway through the site of Stonehenge would destroy irreparably both the visual experience of the site and the irreplaceable archaeological materials yet undiscovered in its path.
-
This road as it is currently planned will cause irreparable damage to a site of both national and international importance. The Western portal is too close to the ancient burial mounds and the eastern...
Read more
-
i feel all sacred sites should be protected not developed.
-
I frequently travel down the A303 to work in Wiltshire. I am particularly concerned about irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
I am writing to register my views on the incredibly short term view on behalf of the current plans. When you review the weight of evidence for what you are going to destroy in the name of...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the proposals relating to the A303. The Stonehenge landscape is of international importance. The proposals would cause irreparable damage to the archaeology of this landscape. As a...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient deeply spiritual site which must never be disturbed by mankind.To desecrate it in any manner is reprehensible,a violation against Nature It must not be disturbed by human...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed road plans and tunnel for the following reasons:-
1. The plans are against the UNESCO's advise who state an alternative route be found
2. Damage has already been caused by...
Read more
-
I believe this land should be left in as natural state as possible with as little development nearby as possible leaving the land around and under the site left untouched.
This is a World Heritage...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the proposal for the following reasons:-
- This is a UNESCO site described as a 'landscape without parallel' and I'm concerned that there will be damage to this World...
Read more
-
This application for development, if approved, will destroy archaeological evidence from a time in pre-history that the whole world would benefit from knowing. Just because we don't yet fuly...
Read more
-
I believe the tunnel and attendant works /structures will cause significant and lasting damage to the archaeology and the landscape in which it is located. This is recognised by UNESCO and a wide...
Read more
-
This site is a sacred burial site and I believe that this should not be dug up, tunnelled or interfered with in any way.Please honour that which is sacred.
I believe Stonehenge...
Read more
-
I believe the new infrastructure will be detrimental to our heritage which is already being eaten up by big corporations. The problem seems to be people slowing down in this area I don't understand...
Read more
-
I worry about the Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
Please can I strongly object to the proposed Stonehenge A303 Stonehenge tunnel etc for the following reasons:
It will seriously damage Blick Mead (BM). The current excavations are smaller than the...
Read more
-
I object to this application on the basis that:
1. There is insufficient there were not be lasting and irreversible damage to an historically unique site. One that is indisputably World Heritage and...
Read more
-
I wish to express my interest against a dual carriageway across the World Heritage site, therefore causing massive damage to the site, its archaeology and setting as well as to any nearby habitats of...
Read more
-
I do not believe the proposed tunnel will be to the longterm benefit if Stonhenge and the surrounding archaeology. Damage at the blick mead site is already apparent even at this early stage of...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a sacred site and should be protected from Irreparable damage to its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’. UNESCO’s international advisers say...
Read more