Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This is a sacred archeological site and should be protected. Respect should be upheld for such a site that generates extensive income for the area by tourism alone.
The road / tunnel should be...
Read more
-
This proposal will have seriously damaging effects upon iconic and irreplaceable archaeological remains that are of national and international significance. Once damaged the information held within...
Read more
-
We feel the Western Portal is to close to the Ancient burial Mounds and the Eastern to close to 'Blickmead' Archaeological site, and that there are issues with light pollution to the west and water...
Read more
-
TURNER (WINTERBOURNE STOKE) LIMITED
Company number 07366769, Manor Farm, Winterbourne Stoke.
DCO Registration of Interested Parties.
We wish to make full written and oral representations on...
Read more
-
Blick Mead
A) Background
Blick Mead is of unique archaeological value. Situated on the eastern edge of the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, the area has yielded extraordinary findings from the...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is part of our heritage and the land surrounding the monument. There is evidence of many other monuments within this landscape which are very important to preserve. I therefore feel it...
Read more
-
I feel that this plan places the tunnel portals far too close to important archaeological sites, including ancient burial grounds. There are also issues with light pollution and ground water.
-
I am concerned about Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to...
Read more
-
This road may cause irreparable damage to a site of both national and international importance. The archaeological and sociological impact of Stonehenge is immense, one of Britain's top tourist...
Read more
-
Having visited the area the last two years, I am hesitant to agree with disturbing this precious and ancient site by disturbing the ground under where it sits. Please consider alternative ideas.
-
A303 Stonehenge Expressway
For some time now I have studied the implications of the proposals to dual the carriageway and create a short tunnel across the World Heritage Site.
I oppose the...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed tunnel being constructed under Stonehenge for the following reasons. Stonehenge holds many mysterious but is also a burial site as well as a place of worship. As a pagan I...
Read more
-
The Hampshire Avon Catchment Partnership (HACP)
The HACP brings together local communities and organisations to plan and deliver positive actions that will improve the water environment of the...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned about this plan's inevitable irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without...
Read more
-
The text below is the Executive Summary of a more comprehensive response, which will be submitted via email separately.
Wiltshire Council is the host authority for the A303 Amesbury to Berwick...
Read more
-
Written Representation by WFA as Interested Party for Examination of Highways England A303 Stonehenge Development Consent Order
The Wiltshire Fishery Association
The Wiltshire Fishery Association...
Read more
-
I am firmly against any further road developments. Based on these points:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
1. The proposal will damage UNESCO listed site.
2. This will damage archaeology of the site itself and surrounding landscape. Deep cut tunnels through barrows or close to them is terrrible.
3. The...
Read more
-
please do not harm the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Please listen to archaeologists. thank you
-
Please See Attachment