Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am hereby support for the proposed Lowe thames crossing route. Dridge and development Having this facilities development would enable me and my family to commute fast and easily for work
-
The impacts the lower Thames crossing will cause on local and surrounding wildlife would be highly damaging. Also the impact on putting another crossing which isn't needed would be damaging to local...
Read more
-
The environmental impact of the proposed crossing outweighs the benefits.
-
Increase in air and noise pollution, whole route fails on WHO-10 levels for PM2.5 No provision for cross river active travel, not viable for public transport due to lack of adequate connections...
Read more
-
I live within a mile of the proposed motorway and I am concerned about the environmental impact generally as well as the negative impact on my quality of life.
-
I object to the scheme because although it may relieve some of the pressure on the Dartford Crossing I do not believe it is worth the money or upheaval it will cause. 1. Spending £9bn on a project at...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
• The Interested Party is identified in the Statement of Reasons Annex B No. 59 and relates to Plots 11-36 and 11-37 • The Applicant has given insufficient consideration to a possible land swap with...
Read more
-
LTC is not ethically supportable
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: • Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. • Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
Road Traffic modelling through Parish of Cobham, Kent and adjacent areas during construction and operation of LTC - no detail provided on data used for modelling and consider modelling highly flawed -...
Read more
-
We do not need another road crossing of the Thames. We need to reduce private car use and get more freight onto rail and river. There are many more useful ways of spending the money set aside for this...
Read more
-
I feel the project is too expensive, is a in the wrong place (the local roads will not cope), will do environmental damage to our area, IF it is needed it needs to be in the right place and other...
Read more
-
Yet another road project will not solve transport problems and in fact will negatively contribute to environmental damage. The funds would be far better spent on public transport, railways, buses,...
Read more
-
The business case benefits are speculative and unavailable. The environmental impact is hugely under-stated. The cost and timescale are under-stated.
-
I am completely against the construction of the lower Thames crossing. As a local resident I think it will blight the lives of myself and my family for generations to come.
-
Air quality in Thurrock. Already poor
-
I am very concerned about the impact on wildlife and their habitats. In particular I would like to highlight : Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and...
Read more
-
Good afternoon, I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
Traffic Management in Grays and surroundings . Grays is badly affected when there are problems on the existing bridge or tunnel crossings. Traffic builds up and can cause traffic jams all the way back...
Read more
-
I work closely with youth organisations in and around the south Ockendon & Thurrock areas, we have concerns that these groups are going to loose a lot of the country side that they have now because of...
Read more
-
PROPERTY Puckle Hill, Shorne – residential property with private woodland and parkland extending in all to 34.23 ac (13.85ha). Owner-occupied by Interested Party. SCHEME 11.03 ha (27.26ac)...
Read more
-
• Statement of Reasons 4.1 under Annex B Schedule of Negotiations No327, identifies the engagement between the parties up to the point of submission of the DCO application and its subsequent...
Read more
-
As a local resident want to ensure needs of local community are full considered in the application, both through the design and construction phase.
-
I am concerned about how close the LTC will be coming to my home. I cannot understand why ULEZ has been brought to Upminster, when the LTC is going to be to close.
-
I do not want to see SW Essex have any more building structures, it is overcrowded now and to add another road tunnel is going to be detrimental to our wildlife and most of all to residents who will...
Read more
-
I object on grounds of pollution and net zero targets not being met. I object on cost that should be put to more useful purposes ie new local NHS hospital and equipment. I object a on grounds that...
Read more
-
I would like to know the impact on air quality and noise pollution and what evidence there is to support all claims if this road was built.
-
The concerns about air quality do not extend to the health risks of a 6 lane motorway through a built up area. The new road crossing poses real dangers to health The new road crossing removes valuable...
Read more
-
The main points I will be regarding access routes to and from the tunnel. In principal I believe we need this crossing, now, and anything that brings this continual review process to a halt will...
Read more
-
My representation will be against the building of the Lower Thames Crossing.
-
The lower Thames crossing is a terrible idea that is destroying the environment and will increase pollution through induced demand. Please stop encouraging private cars damaging our city.
-
Waste of over £10bn+, not value for money, false economy as other spending would be needed as direct result
-
I wish to object to the Lower Thames Crossing for the following reasons :- It will not relieve the problem at the DartfordTunnel It will create more pollution to the area It will increase heavy...
Read more
-
I am against the new crossing,it will not decrease traffic but will increase the air pollution and cause more cases of asthma and other health conditions.
-
I do not wish this crossing, which will be of no useful purpose at all, to run across the fields at the back of my property. We’re being told to plant more trees to help with air quality etc. What...
Read more
-
I object to the Lower Thames Crossing as it will place a large residential area along with its surrounding green fields and recreational areas within a ring of major roads causing pollution of all...
Read more
-
PROPERTY 7 ac. (2.68 ha.) equestrian property with accommodation and grazing for 12 horses to the north of the A13 forming an equestrian livery facility owner-occupied by the Interested Party. SCHEME...
Read more
-
I do not believe that the LTC should be approved to come through East Tilbury and Linford. It will have a great impact on the environment and will not add anything of significance to the area except...
Read more
-
Objection for the need for an additional crossing. Proposed crossing in wrong place. Hugely destructive and harmful. Doesn’t meet scheme objectives Would not solve the problems suffered due to the...
Read more
-
I have concerns over the £10bn+++ LTC, and what a huge waste of taxpayers' money it would be . There are more enviormentally cheaper options like option A14 that was not looked at properly
-
Good afternoon. Due to the word limit in this section, the Marine Management Organisation has submitted our relevant representation via e-mail to lowerthamescrossing@planninginspectorate.gov.uk on 17...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the new Lower Thames Crossing between Essex and Kent and its effects on the environment and natural world including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and...
Read more
-
The crossing should be both a road and rail tunnel. There is no direct railway route between Essex and Kent. That would integrate the transport system and ease congestion on the Dartford tunnel. The...
Read more
-
We presently suffer from an abnormal increased use of Chalk Road, Lower Higham, by HGV's, especially a skip company, namely RS Skips, based on the Apex Business Park. This could be alleviated if a...
Read more
-
I have serious concerns about the impact on wildlife and habitats in Essex, including: Biodiversity loss, such as water voles, reptiles and rare insects. Damage to and fragmentation of habitats,...
Read more
-
The route won't help the issues at the Dartford Crossing and costs to build it are going up and up. The cost is too high when the country is suffering financially. Living near it is going to be awful...
Read more
-
I am primarily concerned about long term capacity of the new crossing and the degree to which it will be "future proofed" including the ability of the crossing to be expanded to provide additional...
Read more
-
Cost of the LTC compared with previously considered options. Will not meet it's original purpose of reducing problems at the Dartford Crossing but will add to and create massive traffic problems in...
Read more