Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This entire project must be stopped as per my original submission. The destruction of land, increased noise, pollution and traffic damage must stop.
-
This project should be cancelled. Ever more roads are yesterday's solution and the projects's own figures demonstrate how insignificant the contribution of this road is predicted to be against...
Read more
-
I am not convinced of the viability of building a new lower Thames Crossing.
-
I object to this on the basis of building more roads just leads to more traffic , more pollution , more bad news for CO2 accumulation and the bad effects on climate change and the bad effects on...
Read more
-
I wish to make comments on the relevance of this project to both national and regional transport infrastructure. Also the development and future potential for both cross-Thames and south-Thames...
Read more
-
Speeding up traveling to Kent
-
I am still waiting for an explanation as to why the project that would see the new Thames Crossing directly joining the southern end of the A130 is no longer an option. The driving force behind the...
Read more
-
Given the climate crisis and the threats to a sustainable environment from resource depletion and covering land with tarmac we should do everything we can to reduce the use of cars. Internal...
Read more
-
In agreement with the plans
-
I am in full support of planning to go ahead. I think it will be good for our transport system. reducing pollution, being better for the environment and also a fantastic opportunity to join Essex with...
Read more
-
The process to produce the crossing is long and detailed. The inclusion has been impressive but it is now time to press onto completion of this much needed project.
-
i need to know that the new crossing is a/ environmentally observing local nature activities b/ efficient and not extending budgets c/ coming in on the correct build times and not delayed d/...
Read more
-
I pay my Council Tax and am a member of the Labour Party. This crossing is close to my house in Kent and affects my property
-
There is an overwhelming need for this Project on balance and I support the proposals.
-
The lower Thames Crossing is a much needed infrastructure project. The delays at the dartford crossing are intolerable. Standing traffic creates huge volumes of pollution. Older vehicles do not have...
Read more
-
I support this development. South Essex and North Kent is in danger of becoming choked by traffic heading from North of London for the continent. The M25 / Dartford Crossing is no longer able to cope...
Read more
-
My life will be negatively impacted by the furtherance of this project and I believe that the project is unnecessary in its present form and that, should the project go forward, there will be...
Read more
-
Faster and less stressful access to Dover ferries and channel tunnel from our Essex home. The Dartford Bridge and Tunnels are a major bottleneck in our journeys at present. The Lower Thames Crossing...
Read more
-
I would like to make a representation opposing the LTC on the following points, where I feel this project in this location will not stand up to scrutiny • The inadequacy of the LTC to provide...
Read more
-
I live on [Redacted], and i am concerned that this road will become a rat run for people to get to the LTC.
-
This plan affects the area where I represent and live and ihave concerns about the build
-
The principle submissions I intend to make are on the environmental impact of the project. This would be on the fauna and flora within the immediate region as well as further afield. I would like to...
Read more
-
I commute to work in Harlow Essex via the M25 and Dartford Crossing so I am fully behind the new Lower Thames Crossing in principle as long as it doesn't overtly and unnecessarily harm the local...
Read more
-
This crossing should be at the A.130 via a Tunnel under the Thames to the M.2 in Kent.This was an option at the start of the Lower Thames Crossing choices, and then removed. It would be the least...
Read more
-
As our property directly borders the development and there will be a new combined footpath / bridleway / cycle path running along the back of our garden once the scheme is built I wish to be able to...
Read more
-
This needs to be built asap to help reduce pollution in Dartford caused by the Dartford tunnels.
-
This route would not solve the problems at the Dartford Crossing. The projected carbon emissions are totally unacceptable. The absolute destruction of wildlife habitat is also unacceptable. The...
Read more
-
I will be affected by increased traffic volume in my local Kent area and would like to see proposals for the mitigation of this problem
-
This project is long overdue and should be supported in principle, subject only to detailed planning and environmental considerations. Important that the expected traffic flows are understood and...
Read more
-
I am against the building of this new road and crossing, as it's construction with bring noise, congestion and pollution to the area.during the build The construction also ends forever some beautiful...
Read more
-
I am strongly opposing the planning and building of the Lower Thames crossing for the following reasons: Environmental impact: The construction of the tunnel and approach roads would have an impact on...
Read more
-
Pollution Close proximity to Linford is unnecessary with there is room to move at least another 500 metres to the west of the village The mess on our small roads for at least 7 years of construction...
Read more
-
Environmental impact
-
Reduce time taken to travel to Essex
-
I support the proposed crossing. It would benefit a huge amount of drivers and overall it would reduce congestion, journey times and emissions for the growing number of drivers making the crossing...
Read more
-
* Environmental impacts and global climate emergency. * Pollution and health impacts * Irreversible change to a semi rural landscape * Economic overdevelopment of South East England * Environmentally...
Read more
-
On a regular basis I am crossing the Thames. Blackwall, Rotherhithe and Dartford are all being used. A new crossing could be very important to me as I make use of the Channel crossing on a very...
Read more
-
Living in Kent and having to travel around the M25 regularly, I am constantly delayed by the traffic congestion around the Dartford crossing. This issue should have been addressed years ago but has...
Read more
-
As a local resident and business person I my representation will be to assess the impact of the proposed changes on local residents and businesses. Also, as a parent of young children, my...
Read more
-
I am very interested in taking part to give an honest opinion and view. We need another crossing as the Dartford crossing is not far from capacity on a daily bases and needs to be reduced. I...
Read more
-
I am an interested party as a local person that uses the roads in this area and how this new road will help with constant traffic jams
-
I drive from either Portsmouth ferry port or Dover ferry port out of and into the UK and need to use the A12 to get to my home. There are regularly queues going south to north at the current crossing...
Read more
-
- The proposed Lower Thames Crossing is not fit for purpose and evidence has been provided that it won't solve the issues at the Dartford Crossing that it has been designed to solve - The proposed LTC...
Read more
-
Tunnel Construction and the method and route to the muck disposal site
-
I live within the affected area I do not think it will eliminate the problems at Dartford caused by the the incomplete M25 ring I am gravely concerned that at a huge public cost it will create a new...
Read more
-
It is my belief that the current proposed route is not & will not be fit for purpose & I propose that Option A & D are re-evaluated.
-
My Specialist area is Safety engineering in relation to hydrogen as a transport fuel. This is due to a) become a big issue for goods vehicles using the Dartford crossings and b) become an essential...
Read more
-
The main point I wish to make as a road user is that the Lower Thames Crossing cannot be built soon enough. The Dartford Crossing is grossly inadequate and does not have capacity to serve traffic...
Read more
-
Whilst I support the need for additional crossings across the Thames this proposal is deficient. This has been approached as a strategic road with insufficient attention paid to the impact on local...
Read more
-
A new Thames crossing is imperative both for communities and commuters. The present infrastructure is not capable of dealing with current traffic levels now and in the future. A new crossing will help...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed scheme will increase carbon emissions by around 6.6m tonnes. This is at odds with the warnings from scientists and the UN IPCC about the need for nations to cut...
Read more
-
As I live very close to the proposed road. I would like to be kept in the loop as to whats going on and to be able to make any points if they need to be raised
-
I hope to address: 1/. Impact on wildlife - including loss of habitat and effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures. 2/. Impact on climate change - including compatibility with national and...
Read more
-
A further crossing between Dartford and Southend is desperately needed to relieve cogestion at the Dartford crossings.
-
Why destroy large portions of South Essex and North Kent, when the relief is required 10 miles away. Its a simple fix that if it had been your preferred option would probably be well under...
Read more
-
As your a civil servant could you explain why the road did not come up in a 25 year search , we have lived here for over 15 years and nothing come up in the search from the solicitors. This major road...
Read more
-
Is in support of the crossing with regard to the local and national road infastructure. My representation would be to monitor the means to aid and increase the flow of HGV traffic into and across this...
Read more
-
My principal submission, while supporting much of the proposals, is that the planning process to date has not taken sufficient account of the impact on local roads south of the Thames. In particular,...
Read more
-
I will comment on any changes to the areas around Chalk.
-
I want to understand fully the road layout in Hornsby Lane
-
I travel to Broadstairs from Nottingham twice a month and realise that we need this Lower Thames Crossing now, not in 100 years when I'm dead. Get your skates on and stop messing around with enquiries...
Read more
-
The main points that I intend to raise are on the following: The traffic impact of the proposal on local roads and junctions on the highway network. The lack of proper links such that traffic from all...
Read more
-
I wish to make a representation regarding motorcycles using the tunnel and having the same access rights as they have at the present Dartford crossing. i.e. learners can use the tunnel as can...
Read more
-
1. That every effort will be made to recruit workers locally 2. That if there is a toll levied all residents within a 10 mile radius will be given a preferential pass. 3. Every care will be taken to...
Read more
-
The decision to proceed with the current Lower Thames crossing was made without adequate consideration of the alternative which was designated as scheme A14 in the original evaluations. Scheme A14 is...
Read more
-
To ensure that the natural environment of Shorne Ifield Road (the road adjascent to Thong Lane), Randall and Shorne Woods and their environs, are protected from damage, destruction or degregation,...
Read more
-
I support the new crossing
-
As a resident of (REDACTED). We do not want this new road or the impact it will have on the area. It will cause high level or noise and even more pollution in a highly polluted area already. It will...
Read more
-
My representation will be from the point of view of ecological damage and inappropriateness of the project given the government's climate commitments.
-
Living in southeast Kent and having to use the M25 and all the difficults it has with assidents & too much traffic it'll be great to go north without the M25 & it'll be easier to get to Norwich and...
Read more
-
In order to meet legally binding climate change targets, private car use in the UK must be reduced by 25%, there is therefore no need for an additional crossing. The funding needs to be directed...
Read more
-
The Area urgently needs this so get on with it.
-
I think that the new river crossing should go ahead. Just having the Blackwall and Dartford tunnels isn't enough - and the Rotherhithe tunnel is just a Victorian throwback.
-
As a holiday home owner in Allhallows , near Rochester - this will affect traffic flow from Essex to Kent and congestion will build up around get entrance in burg sides of the estuary. The damage to...
Read more
-
I believe this plan is the way forward in developing not only this country's infrastructure but also to maintain better links to Europe
-
That the planned access from A2 onto the tunnel approach road is inadequate. At this point the number of lanes is reducing from existing. The design relies on the Smart motorway principle which is now...
Read more
-
The MCA has an interest in the works associated with the marine environment, and the potential impact on the safety of navigation, access to ports, harbours and marinas and any impact on our search...
Read more
-
Just build it
-
The country needs this initiative to keep transport moving and relieve the nonsense surrounding the Dartford Crossing
-
I have serious concerns over the impact of this proposal to air quality, noise and light pollution, and the effect which the scheme will have upon the general health of Thurrock residents. Our area is...
Read more
-
I have lived in Kent for 40+ years and have always worked in various locations in London and Essex. I have found that East London and Essex have long been disconnected from Kent and vice versa due to...
Read more
-
The Medway Labour and Cooperative Group will be making making representations on: The impact the LTC will have on the highways infrastructure in Medway and the wider North Kent area The implications...
Read more
-
Strongly in favour of professing as quickly as possible.
-
I believe this will eventually cost 10 billion plus and do very little to improve traffic movement in Thurrock and Dartford. The money should surely be directed to more worthy needs. I know my views...
Read more
-
As a person deeply affected by the Dartford crossing, since i live next to it, I'd really like to understand and contribute to the review and design of the lower Thames crossing.
-
My main points are the many points of pollution that the road will cause, and that the road will be the 3rd side of a triangle that will totally encircle Sth ockendon by major roads. The fact that...
Read more
-
I wish to express my views to the flow and layout of junctions of the proposed new road.
-
I fully support the Lower Thames Crossing designed as a Three lane all purpose dual Carriageway with its design features with green bridges and landscaping to screen the road from noise, visual, and...
Read more
-
The area where I live Linford/Stanford already has some of the most polluted air in Europe let alone the UK. You now plan to drive a new motorway through an area of green belt land. Are you trying to...
Read more
-
My concerns are that the new road will be too close to my home. This causes me concerns about the disruption during the construction of the new road as well as after the road has been completed. The...
Read more
-
I wish to support the application.
-
Poor future proofing - a 3 lane motorway with no 'hard shoulder' is a recipe for disaster. It needs to be a minimum of 3 running lanes with a hard shoulder, preferably with 4 running lanes and a hard...
Read more
-
I believe the construction of lower Thames crossing would make life easier for people living in Kent, Essex and environ. It would be a good addition to our infrastructure. Connections around the area...
Read more
-
Opportunity South Essex (OSE) represents the Business Community across South Essex, covering the local authority areas of Thurrock, Brentwood, Basildon, Castle Point, Southend and Rochford. OSE is...
Read more
-
My representation relates to the concerns I have with the following: 1) the plan as submitted does not resolve the issues with the existing crossing and therefore does not provide value to the...
Read more
-
To ensure that the new road does not suffer from the problems built into previous schemes. Also that the road works necessary to build the new road do not make a large impact on the existing...
Read more
-
I am concerned at the environmental aspects and that forms the basis of my representation in this process.
-
I am interested to know why this project is still being considered . Taking into consideration the negative environmental impact, the loss of green belt, devastation to ancient woodlands and wildlife...
Read more
-
I confirm that I will be part of this process and agree that the Lower Thames crossing is a well needed transport requirement to alleviate traffic between Essex and North Kent
-
I am STRONGLY OPPOSED TO THIS DEVELOPMENT I suspect the developers of this project are so focused on their profitability, they have forgotten we have a Climate Crisis. What we need right now is fewer...
Read more