Representation by Yvonne Julie Dent (Yvonne Julie Dent )
- Date submitted
- 1 September 2022
- Submitted by
- Members of the public/businesses
Interested Party and Affected Landowner and Farmer We set out below our representations, objections and observations in regard to the freehold land to be acquired as part of the development consent order (“the DCO”) being sought for the National Highways A66 Northern Trans-Pennine Project (“the Project”). No individual land plans have been provided to show the schedule and areas of land to be acquired. The affected land is agricultural land near to Kirkby Thore and land close to Powis House. The parties do not object to the A66 NTP Project in principle however we make the following representations: 1. Permanent Acquisition and Temporary Land occupation The current red line boundary which National Highways have identified in the design drawings are excessive. Suggestion to refine the red line boundary and reduce the land take. From these plans it is not understood whether the entirety of the red line boundary is to be permanently acquired or rights are to be sought on a temporary basis. If land is to be acquired on temporary basis, what are the agreements and reservations. Further clarity must be provided by National Highways on this point. Object to the proposed design as the road is now immediately adjacent to Powis House farm steading and very close proximity to the residential property which will devalue the farm and will create significant noise pollution. 2. Environmental Mitigation The amended environmental mitigation requirements have not been published for consultation, nor have the management prescriptions been disclosed until following the DCO application. The proposed Environmental Mitigation land is excessive and does not take into consideration or rationalise any comparison to the future losses to agricultural business. The losses to the agricultural business must outweigh any environmental mitigation consideration and therefore my clients fundamentally object to the proposals. The majority of the designated Environmental Mitigation land is on highly productive agricultural land. If appropriate consultation had occurred, then alternative mitigation areas could have been identified by my clients on the less productive areas. The habitat types and conditions referred to in the environmental mitigation design has been based on the Biodiversity Metric 2.0, the most up to date Biodiversity metric is the Biodiversity Metric 3.1, therefore the most informed and technical data has not been used on this project to identify and mitigate any environmental loss. Without prejudice, the permanent acquisition of land for the environmental mitigation may be unnecessary as my clients may wish to offer rights and enter into restrictive and enforceable positive covenants to manage these areas in an agreed manner. Detailed or draft Habitat Management commitment agreements have not been provided for review to facilitate the environmental mitigation land, as such the future impacts and landowner requirements are not yet known. 3. Private Utility connections There has been no consultation on the private utility supplies on the land affected by the scheme. There are several private water mains, electricity and fibre connections which are apparently severed by the design and there has been no consideration as to how these will be mitigated. Most private utility pathways are not delineated on plans and are merely known by my clients who have occupied the land for many years. If these are severed and damaged during construction, this could have serious negative impacts on not only domestic beneficiaries but also agricultural purposes. 4. Drainage Consultation Object to the large attenuation/balancing ponds which sits immediately to the East of Powis House, there is great concern that in periods of heavy rainfall that this could flood the farm steading. The balancing ponds should be rationalised into the least number of ponds necessary thus reducing access and potential issues with outfall drainage. There is a concern as to how these balancing/attenuation ponds are going to connect into existing drainage networks as no consultation has been undertaken. There has been no consultation on the impact on drainage nor any management plan for the work which will be required to existing ditches drains and culverts. This is a major oversight as most of the land affected by the scheme is highly productive agricultural land. Most drainage pathways are not delineated on plans and are merely known by my clients who have occupied the land for many years. Any severance and damage to these drains could have a serious impact on the use of the land and therefore the farming businesses. Drainage can also be a major problem many years post construction and no assurance has been provided to detail how this will be managed. 5. Access and additional Public Rights of Way (PROWS) Objection to any joint private access tracks and PROWS which are identified together, any joint access routes must be segregated and kept separate by fencing and hedgerows. The combining of private access predominantly for the use of agriculture and public access could have serious consequences and pose a serious risk to the safety of both users. Objection to additional land take adjacent to the old A66 for use as a cycleway. This is not an efficient use of good quality agricultural land and causes additional land take to landowners already heavily affected by the scheme. 6. Layby Locations Objection to the proposed location of the lay-by located immediately adjacent to Powis House farm steading which includes a residential property. The location of this lay-by will result in additional nuisance and excessive injurious affection. Litter will be deposited in the lay-bys and blow into the nearby fields which could cause health and safety concerns for grazing animals. There could also be security issues to Powis House farm steading which is located very close to the lay-by. The lay-bys should be located in more secluded and favourable locations along the route.