Manston Airport

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 51 to 75 of 429 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to S Alvers

    I have now disgested much of the RSP application docs for their withdrawn application. Unfortunately I still have some very significiant gaps in my understanding of how this could ever be made to... Read more

    Enquiry from: S Alvers
    Date advice given: 17 August 2018

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    Please consider the attached detailed comments regarding the adequacy of the applicant's statutory consultation. Could you also kindly clarify if you regard the statutory consultation processes as... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 17 August 2018

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    I note that the application has been accepted for examination and that you decided, overall, that the statutory consultation could be accepted also. I have looked at what your "application check... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 17 August 2018

  • View advice to Steve Harding

    Could you please advise where and when a hard copy of the Manston DCO Environmental Statement may be viewed.

    Enquiry from: Steve Harding
    Date advice given: 16 August 2018

  • View advice to Samara Jones-Hall

    I have just looked on the Companies House website and note that Riveroak Strategic Partners Limited filed accounts for a dormant company in 11 April 2018. How can a dormant company apply for a DCO?... Read more

    Enquiry from: Samara Jones-Hall
    Date advice given: 16 August 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    Can you please confirm whether your decision to accept means that: 1. You have decided that the project is a NISP? 2. That RSP have addressed to your satisfaction on the issues you raised with... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 15 August 2018

  • View advice to Andy Hodder

    I am sure you always aim to act in the best interests of all but i plead with you to pay serious consideration to rejecting the DCO at Manston Airport. Commercially it has never been a success,... Read more

    Enquiry from: Andy Hodder
    Date advice given: 15 August 2018

  • View advice to Ken Wraight

    Please can you clarify the situation re advice from pins to rsp. Dco was withdrawn last time so you could advise rsp further. It now seems again that pins are now actively supporting rsp in coaching... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ken Wraight
    Date advice given: 15 August 2018

  • View advice to Adam Satchwell

    Please grant the DCO for the reopening of Manston airport. It is a national asset which can serve the country as a whole for years to come. I am currently involved in a project which may also... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adam Satchwell
    Date advice given: 15 August 2018

  • View advice to Richard Card

    My understanding is that the applicant must go through scoping and then conduct impact inquiry taking account of precautionary principle and cumulative effect assessment. This must form part of the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Richard Card
    Date advice given: 10 August 2018

  • View advice to Allan Tudor

    Like many others I am concerned about the planed resurrection of Manston as a cargo hub . Please can you tell me if ( should the dco be granted ) there is an opportunity for people like myself to... Read more

    Enquiry from: Allan Tudor
    Date advice given: 7 August 2018

  • View advice to Marva Rees

    At RSP's latest consultation the public was told that RSP planned to have 17000+ ATMs a year. That number has risen to 83000. Will there be another consultation?

    Enquiry from: Marva Rees
    Date advice given: 3 August 2018

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    I have noticed that RSP have reapplied for a DCO on the Manston site. I have being regularly checking your site but there was no notice of this . In your minutes of the meeting of 22 June RSP agreed... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ian Scott
    Date advice given: 2 August 2018

  • View advice to James Chappell

    I'm concerned about RSP's unwillingness to correspond with me about the number of ATM's they propose. The Meeting Notes of the 11 May meeting between the PI and RSP show all sorts of figures for the... Read more

    Enquiry from: James Chappell
    Date advice given: 2 August 2018

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    The enquirer addressed their concerns on the Applicant's 2018 Statutory Consultation.

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 2 August 2018

  • View advice to S Alvers

    I note from social media postings that an email was yesterday leaked, from Bircham Dyson Bell to PINs regarding RSP's withdrawn DCO application - indicating that they were seeking to optimise the... Read more

    Enquiry from: S Alvers
    Date advice given: 1 August 2018

  • View advice to Ackers Johnson

    In the June 22 meeting note that has just been loaded it says it was agreed Riveroak would tell you the anticipated submission date once known. As many are saying that it is an attempt to influence... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ackers Johnson
    Date advice given: 24 July 2018

  • View advice to Jonathan Fowler

    Can you please advise when the Planning Inspectorate became aware of RiverOak's intention to submit their application on this date, as nothing was noted on your website.

    Enquiry from: Jonathan Fowler
    Date advice given: 24 July 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    Having reviewed the submission documents which you kindly sent me it seems clear that there is significant information disclosed in these documents that was not available to the general public for... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 24 July 2018

  • View advice to Michael Child

    Does that mean that the DCO compensation, probably many millions, could be paid via the planning inspectorate thus avoiding legitimate money sourcing legislation?

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 23 July 2018

  • View advice to Richard Card

    What duty is there on an applicant to disclose facts which may be adverse to their cause ? Has RSP disclosed that there are as yet unresolved police, public health and environment agency inquiries... Read more

    Enquiry from: Richard Card
    Date advice given: 23 July 2018

  • View advice to Jonathan Fowler

    I note from media coverage regarding the recently resubmitted DCO application for the former Manston Airport that part of the site could be used for Operation Stack. The following excerpt is taken... Read more

    Enquiry from: Jonathan Fowler
    Date advice given: 20 July 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I understand RSP may have submitted their DCO application again this week. Can you please confirm that all comments previously received by you when the first application was made and subsequently... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 20 July 2018

  • View advice to Michael Child

    My understanding was that for pins to accept the application fee, which they have, they would have to be reasonably sure that the money was legitimately sourced. I thought this would apply to any... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 20 July 2018

  • View advice to Michael Child

    RiverOak-RSP announced on 16th July 2018 that they have resubmitted their DCO application, see http://rsp.co.uk/news/rsps-manston-airport-development-consent-order-application-is-resubmitted/ Can... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 20 July 2018