Manston Airport

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 26 to 50 of 429 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I have a question regarding whether pins can limit a sponsors project plans when granting a DCO. All interested parties whether for or against the airport, SMA, SMAA, SUMA, NNF, Craig Mackinlay MP... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 12 October 2018

  • View advice to Alan Welcome

    The enquirer requested information on how a group of persons could register and make representations.

    Enquiry from: Alan Welcome
    Date advice given: 26 September 2018

  • View advice to Jon Fowler

    However, you have failed to address the two points I raised, these being : 1. Whether the Planning Inspectorate is concerned about DCO applicants lying about their applications, apparently with... Read more

    Enquiry from: Jon Fowler
    Date advice given: 26 September 2018

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    Now that the Manston DCO is entering the examination stage can you tell me if PINS will be calling on experts in the various fields needed to test RSP’s application claims, i.e. their business plan,... Read more

    Enquiry from: Ian Scott
    Date advice given: 26 September 2018

  • View advice to S Alvers

    From the information in the public domain it is not clear what has changed with regard to RSP's submission that allowed this change of stance where the previous advice, regarding RSP's withdrawn... Read more

    Enquiry from: S Alvers
    Date advice given: 26 September 2018

  • View advice to Cathy Rogers

    I would like to register as an interested party in the Manston Airport Application for a national infrastructure project and note on your guidance that all contact details that you receive as part of... Read more

    Enquiry from: Cathy Rogers
    Date advice given: 24 September 2018

  • View advice to S Alvers

    My questions are as follows: 1. Which of the 4 elements that Riveroak claim limit the existing capability of Manston to zero did you rely on in arriving at you conclusion that its has zero inherent... Read more

    Enquiry from: S Alvers
    Date advice given: 19 September 2018

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    The first question asked what weight, if any, PINS gave to the detailed and substantial factual evidence submitted to it regarding the misrepresentation by the applicant of his proposals during the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 19 September 2018

  • View advice to Jon Fowler

    Can you confirm that the Planning Inspectorate is not concerned if a DCO applicant makes public statements containing lies, as long as these lies do not directly involve the processes set out in the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Jon Fowler
    Date advice given: 19 September 2018

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    i have just read the explanation given on page 120 of the applicant's Planning Statement regarding his astonishing disregard of the extensive representations made by the host local authority in... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 19 September 2018

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    I am currently reading the Environmental Statement, to ensure that any representations engage directly with what the application. I find that the problems created by the length and complexity of... Read more

    Enquiry from: Mark de Pulford
    Date advice given: 19 September 2018

  • View advice to James Hose

    Following the submission for a DCO made by Riveroak I would like to ask about compulsory acquisition. I believe, as part of their submission Riveroak are asking for a compulsory acquisition of the... Read more

    Enquiry from: James Hose
    Date advice given: 3 September 2018

  • View advice to Dennis Franklin

    As an "Interested party" living within half a mile of the flight path of any proposed cargo aircraft landing at Manston, which they will have to do in my case at a height of some 200meters, at least... Read more

    Enquiry from: Dennis Franklin
    Date advice given: 3 September 2018

  • View advice to Various enquiries

    The following persons attempted to make comments to the Inspectorate on the merits of the Proposed Development between 17 and 31 August 2018: Tony and June Bate; Marc Flint; Margaret and Ken... Read more

    Enquiry from: Various enquiries
    Date advice given: 31 August 2018

  • View advice to Poppy Jeffrey

    About a week ago, the website said that interest could be registered from September 3, but that date has now been removed from the website. Is there a reason for this?

    Enquiry from: Poppy Jeffrey
    Date advice given: 31 August 2018

  • View advice to Paul Whiteside

    I didn't think this would be such a bureaucratic process. I have given my thoughts and there will be nothing more from me.

    Enquiry from: Paul Whiteside
    Date advice given: 31 August 2018

  • View advice to Michael Child

    Perhaps there is some way of making RSP put the documents online, on an ordinary, navigable and searchable website. Online as a serried of pdfs where you can’t really tell what information they... Read more

    Enquiry from: Michael Child
    Date advice given: 31 August 2018

  • View advice to Jonathan Fowler

    Several people have expressed concerns that, should they register as interested parties for the Manston Airport DCO, their names and possibly addresses will be made public on the Planning Inspectorate... Read more

    Enquiry from: Jonathan Fowler
    Date advice given: 30 August 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    1. You have decided that the project is a NISP ? 2. That RSP have addressed to your satisfaction on the issues you raised with them regarding their initial submission which they withdrew ? 3. You... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 24 August 2018

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    Does PINS routinely accept for examination plans for developments where the money will be raised at a later date? Did PINS consider how the project would be funded before accepting this application... Read more

    Enquiry from: Peter Binding
    Date advice given: 24 August 2018

  • View advice to Jonathan Fowler

    Up until yesterday, the PINS website showed a date for the opening of registration of interested parties. Today, the website shows that you will publish the date for registration, implying that the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Jonathan Fowler
    Date advice given: 24 August 2018

  • View advice to Jonathan Fowler

    I write further to the statement issued by Tony Freudmann to KMTV, which was published yesterday and which is at approximately 19 minutes into the broadcast which can be found at the following link :... Read more

    Enquiry from: Jonathan Fowler
    Date advice given: 23 August 2018

  • View advice to Samara Jones-Hall

    I note that it is now time for the applicant, RiverOak Strategic Partners Ltd to publicise the fact that its application has been accepted for examination and invite people who are interested in the... Read more

    Enquiry from: Samara Jones-Hall
    Date advice given: 21 August 2018

  • View advice to Nigel Phethean

    I am looking for guidance on what role if any the applicant/developer has during the Examination stage of a DCO. For example are they present at all hearings and do they have a right to cross examine... Read more

    Enquiry from: Nigel Phethean
    Date advice given: 20 August 2018

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I note from RSPs submission that they seem to be claiming that with the number of stands they are providing they could support over 83,000 movements, way in excess of the additional 10,000 over... Read more

    Enquiry from: Adem Mehmet
    Date advice given: 17 August 2018