Manston Airport

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 76 to 100 of 429 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Anonymous

    As you seem to be back in the pre-application stage I wonder if you have ever answered these two questions; 1. You have made it quite clear that the application has to follow the procedure as... Read more

  • View advice to Sophie Fowler

    RSP are saying that they have resubmitted their DCO application to you but as yet it’s not showing on your website and I haven’t received an email. Could you confirm if RSP have resubmitted and if so... Read more

  • View advice to Jonathan Fowler

    As a further development, I note that RiverOak Strategic Partners have today announced that they have resubmitted their application. Can you please confirm whether this is actually the case.

  • View advice to Nigel Phethean

    It is almost three weeks since you recorded that a project update meeting was held on 22 June 2018 with representatives of RSP. In the interests of transparency can you please indicate how much... Read more

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    The question in my original email was, if you have to agree minutes from meetings with RSP is this is what is delaying publication ? You had a meeting in January which had relevant details that... Read more

  • View advice to Ian Scott

    I notice since RSP withdrew their application for a DCO your web page shows that “the applicant has set no timetable for this application” Is there any indication of when they will. Given the... Read more

  • View advice to Save Manston Airport association (SMAa)

    You have indicated a preference for combined communications (most recently on 2018-06-26) : “We encourage and advise all stakeholders who share similar views to collate communications to us because... Read more

  • View advice to Sophie Fowler

    Have RiverOak Strategic Partners resubmitted their application or given you any indication when they will be resubmitting?

  • View advice to Michael Child

    it was pins saying 'In terms of payment of fees, there is no due diligence that the Planning Inspectorate is required to undertake. It is the payment and clearing of a fee in respect of a named case... Read more

  • View advice to Michael Child

    Near the beginning of the pre application stage I asked pins about the position regarding money paid to pins by RiverOak RSP in terms of how pins would ensure that the money, from what is basically a... Read more

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    It seems to me that the powers granted under the 2008 planning act were really supposed to speed up the planning process for major infrastructure designated by government as essential to the future of... Read more

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    You were asked why you were writing to the pro-airport organisation, asking them to write to you, whilst simultaneously telling them that only comments relating to the applicants consultation can... Read more

  • View advice to Save Manston Airport association Committee

    The SMAa Committee submitted a letter to the Planning Inspectorate, supporting the Manston Airport DCO, and requesting that the process move forwards faster, so that thousands of pro Manston Airport... Read more

  • View advice to James Chappell

    Please would you indicate: how many meetings (face-to-face or teleconference) have occurred between RSP and the PI since May 3rd; and when the next meeting or teleconference between RSP and the PI is... Read more

  • View advice to Nigel Phethean

    In your note of meeting of 11 May 2018 with representatives of RSP it was stated that a further meeting would be held once matters raised by the Inspectorate had been addressed by the applicant. Has... Read more

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    According to this petition, you have specifically asked the pro-airport Manston campaign groups to submit multi-signature letters rather than writing to you individually. Is this true? My... Read more

  • View meeting with RiverOak Strategic Partners

    Project update meeting.

  • View meeting with RiverOak Strategic Partners

    Project update meeting

  • View advice to S Alvers

    Thank you for your response and for directing me to the RSP PIER. From my reading of these documents while there are extensive they in no way give me any sense of what the potential impact on... Read more

  • View advice to Ken Wraight

    Please can you confirm that you have asked SMAa for a petition in support of the dco application? Have you asked the legal owners if they would like to submit a counter petition. It has seemed to be... Read more

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    I have received the folllowing request to sign a petition/letter to you:... Read more

  • View advice to Richard Card

    Whereas I have concentrated on Thanet District Council failure to comply with law of precautionary principle and spirit of laws of duty to promote well being re public health , the fact is the... Read more

  • View advice to Michael Child

    Could you kindly clarify the situation with some aspects of the RSP DCO for me, or failing that tell me who I should be asking? Now the application has been withdrawn does this mean that it should... Read more

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I've read the minutes of the meeting held between yourselves and RSP in which you raise a number of inconsistencies in their documentation in a variety of areas including basic and essential... Read more

  • View advice to S Alvers

    I note from your recently published records of meetings with RSP that you make reference to their project having a cabability in excess of 82,000 flights. I have not seen that number in any of the... Read more