Manston Airport

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 101 to 125 of 429 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Ackers Johnson

    I am a bit puzzled as I can't see how RiverOak can acquire the whole airport if they claim they are only altering it. Thee environmental info said that the runway is only been resurfaced, not... Read more

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    Unfortunately I did not find that your reply dealt with the question, which was: "could you kindly clarify if PINS have in place any targets regarding the publication of notes of meetings with... Read more

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    Could you kindly clarify if PINS have in place any targets regarding the publication of notes of meetings with DCO applicants and, if not, what the public may reasonably expect in terms of your... Read more

  • View advice to James Chappell

    In reply to an enquiry by Nigel Phethean (24 May 2018) you said: “Any delay in the publishing of the note from the meeting with RSP on 11 May 2018 is a result of the drafting and finalisation... Read more

  • View advice to Anonymous

    What part of the DCO process will enable PINS to say “enough is enough”? Which begs the question “why not?” Surely the draftees of PA2008 wouldn’t have drafted legislation that could be misused... Read more

  • View advice to Ackers Johnson

    RSP have said previously that they think they are a NSIP as they are altering the airport. If so, surely compaulsory acquisition powers should only be for the bits that are being altered and need... Read more

  • View advice to Sophie Fowler

    Could you please tell me if RiverOak Strategic Partners have resubmitted their DCO application. If they have could you tell me why it has not been published on your website. If not have they set a... Read more

  • View advice to Nigel Phethean

    It is now nearly two weeks since the meeting the Inspectorate held with RSP to explain its concerns about the documentation submitted leading to the withdrawal of the DCO application. Given the... Read more

  • View advice to Anonymous

    Would you please explain just how this process allows a legitimate landowner to have the value of their investment permanently blighted as it seems to many that RSP could, if minded, continuously... Read more

  • View advice to James Chappell

    Is there any special reason why the meeting note in respect of the Feb 23rd meeting has taken almost 3 months to finalise? How long do you anticipate the preparation and publication of the meeting... Read more

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    You have issued a clear exposition of some major concerns. Those concerns appear, on the face if it, to be incompatible with acceptance of the application as it the stood. Is that inference... Read more

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    Are you able to comment as to whether the applicant at this point has complied with their Schedule 4 obligations ?

  • View advice to Anonymous

    Recent correspondence between PINS and interested parties have included the following statement however in view of the feedback issued to RSP on the 4/5/2018 which precipitated their withdrawal your... Read more

  • View advice to Ian and Hilary Scott

    Our question as to whether this could be viewed in practice as a consultation period between PINS & RSP was really not answered. To an observer this does seem to be the case borne out by conferences... Read more

  • View advice to John Davison

    The enquirer submitted representations regarding the merits of the proposed development during the Pre-application stage.

  • View advice to Ian and Hilary Scott

    As there seems to be a lot of missing information in RSPs application that will have to be provided to PINS can you tell us whether these shortcomings will require another public consultation before... Read more

  • View advice to Adem Mehmet

    I have seen various comments suggesting that an applicant for a DCO must consider other ways in which they can deliver the stated aim of the NISP they are seeking to define. In the case of RSP the aim... Read more

  • View advice to Michael Child

    I am concerned that this DCO application which was vigorously supported by both Thanet's Conservative MPs may have been intended to cause what it has actually achieved. Namely the dropping of the... Read more

  • View advice to Mark de Pulford

    I note that RSP declares on its website that it has "temporarily" withdrawn its application for a DCO. It claims that "this is not uncommon with DCOs and RSP is in dialogue with the Planning... Read more

  • View advice to Ken Wraight

    Can you please tell me how common it is to withdraw an application on the day a decision to go ahead or not to is made thank you. Roughly how many times before has this happened and it it expected... Read more

  • View advice to Anonymous

    According to the PI's web site, the Manston application has been withdrawn. Yet when I go to the home page and select the filter to show only withdrawn status applications, no records are... Read more

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    We are told that RiverOak Strategic Partners has withdrawn its application for a Development Consent Order to reopen Manston Airport. Further information has only come from one of the local MP's,... Read more

  • View advice to Stone Hill Park Ltd

    I would be grateful if you would respond by return to confirm the following; • whether any s51 advice has been provided to RSP in relation to the submitted (and now withdrawn) proposed DCO... Read more

  • View advice to Stephanie Flower

    Please could you tell me how many times you will allow RSP to withdraw and resubmit their application? Is there a limit, or is this going to pause any sensible development of the site and of other... Read more

  • View advice to Peter Binding

    If RSP are going to submit further details about the environmental impact to PINS should they not be required to show this information to the people who are likely to be worst affected?