Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 326 to 350 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Jane Rossin

    Please consider my representations regarding the proposed East Anglia ONE North project. These focus particularly on those aspects that would affect my life and well-being during the lengthy... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Jennifer Knights

    Traffic Destruction of the countryside Environmental Flooding Noise level

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Julia Wheeler

    I support the PINS representations made by Friston Parish Council and SASES (Substation Action – Save East Suffolk) and reserve the right to be allowed to comment on all or any of the points they have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Juliet Orr

    1. The whole economy of the east Suffolk area is dependent on tourism. If the peace, the beauty and wildlife are destroyed by these huge substations, trenches and associated traffic, visitors will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Kirsty Dixon

    I am concerned over the decision to build a large, unsightly substation at and around the village of Friston. I have been a regular visitor to the area over the last nine year and the highlight of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Kirsty Logan

    I object to the planning application on the grounds that the cumulative environmental impact of so many separate energy projects in the region that don’t tie in together is disastrous for our wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • L Fagg

    This will destroy an area of outstanding natural beauty. It will hinder emergency service from reaching the largely elderly population of Aldeburgh, resulting in possible deaths. It is unsuitable in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • M Haydon

    I am concerned about the incompatibility of the proposed substation & Friston village. It is out of scale with the village & do not electronic waves interfere with people & facilities adjacent to high... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Malcolm Miller

    I object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for these reasons: -cumulative impact on our local communities of up to seven energy projects occurring consecutively over 12-15 years.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Mali Eber Rose

    I am a regular visitor to the Suffolk Heritage coast staying with friends who live near Friston. I do not object to offshore wind farms what I object to is the onshore installations which will cause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Margaret Gooderham

    I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning applicationfor the following reasons: Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substation complexes the size of Wembley Stadium Local road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Margo Roofthooft

    I am deeply concerned about the following: Heritage - Site Involves listed buildings, five 11 and two grade 11* Landscape - Will change the character of Friston, severely damage the landscape causing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Matthew Greenburgh

    This proposal will destroy a lovely area of Suffolk, blight the lives of locals, massively reduce the amenity of tourists and other Suffolk residents (myself included) who visit the area. Whilst I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Michael Mahony

    1. I am the freehold owner and occupier of the residential and agricultural land comprised in Plots 115, 116 and 126 on the Land Plans, over which permanent and temporary rights are sought under the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Michael Pritt

    Dear Examining Authority Re East Anglia North One I wish to object to this Scottish Power renewables planning application for the following reasons: - The cumulative effect on local communities and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Mike Lewis

    Dear Examining Authority , I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) planning application for the following reasons:- I support all the points made by the SASES group and Friston Parish... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Monica Winter

    I object to the proposals made by Scottish Power Renewables (SPR) for the substations site in Friston. I support the representations made by SASES (Substation Action Save East Suffolk) and Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Mr Robin Frampton

    I'm in favour of offshore wind power generation. I believe that the environmental impact of these projects should be minimized. In particular, the substations on land should be sited where they cause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Nathaniel Walters

    I'm writing not to oppose the windfarm itself, which is badly needed, but for the poorly conceived and unnecessarily destructive infrastructure plans. Specifically the plan to bring the power to shore... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Peter Donker Curtius

    Dear Sir/Madam, Firstly, I support the representations being made by SASES and Friston Parish Council objecting to the proposed sub-station being sited on the very edge of the charming village of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Philip Larking

    Substations dangerously close to and of a footprint which will dominate our peaceful village . The village is already subject to flash floods this installation will make the situation much worse.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Rachel Hughes

    I am a regular visitor to the Suffolk Heritage coast staying with friends who live near Friston. I do not object to offshore wind farms what I object to is the onshore installations which will cause... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Rebecca Bloomfield

    Failure to properly consult with the local communities and businesses affected. SPR and the District Council did not take actively provide the appropriate details needed to provide social,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Reydon Parish Council (Reydon Parish Council)

    Reydon Parish Council is totally in favour of renewable energy, but want to see further consideration given to the proposed size of the turbines off this heritage coast and the impact they will have... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020

  • Richard Keeble

    I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to SEVEN energy projects occurring consecutively over... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 January 2020