Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This scheme will cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
I have concerns about...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
That the proposed works will irreparably damage this unique archeological landscape.
-
Stonehenge A303 Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010025
ICOMOS-UK wishes to register as an Interested Party for the Examination of the above application for development.
ICOMOS-UK is concerned...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the prosed plans and the permanent damage these would cause to one of England's most Sacred ancient sites, a World Heritage Site, its archaeology and its setting. It is clear this...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned by this proposal and do not believe it should go ahead.
-
I am concerned about the damage and disturbance this would cause to this World Heritage sacred site, including noise pollution.
-
1. It is applying an old approach to a problem without considering implications of new technology on future transport systems e.g. driverless cars
2. There is much important archaeology e.g....
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 road /tunnel development around the Stonehenge World Heritage site because it will irreparably damage and destroy the important archaeology in the surrounding area. Proof...
Read more
-
For many years I have studied ancient sites and have visited many World Heritage sites across the globe
One of the things that I have come to realise is that almost ubiquitously there are signs of...
Read more
-
The proposal is insufficiently sensitive to the special requirements of this unique site. The extremely important and rare nature of Stonehenge means we should not go nowhere near any semblance of...
Read more
-
The above plan will, in my view:
Cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting;
ignore UNESCO's advisers who say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the current application on the following grounds:
I object to any further disturbance of this incredibly rich and vast area of prehistory
I object to the disturbance of any...
Read more
-
The new expressway could cause extreme damage to an amazing World Heritage Site.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead.
There are also a lack of alternative options in...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that this proposed development will harm the environment and potentially risk losing the heritage status.
-
All my life I have dreamed of going to Stonehenge. It would be a horrible thing to have it undermined by tunneling on the grounds surrounding it. It would weaken the soil and cause the stones to fall....
Read more
-
The most important point that I hope the planning Inspectorate will consider is that the proposed scheme will cause permanent damage to the archaeology and setting of a unique World Heritage...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, it's archaeology and setting.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead...
Read more
-
I oppose the plan to take the A303 under the plain near Stonehenge. Stonehenge is itself too important a monument to be put at risk by these works. The plan will also risk the disturbance and...
Read more
-
1. With thousands of motor vehicles passing by Stonehenge every day, there would be the risk that:
(a) Levels of nitrogen dioxide would increase to such an extent that over decades they would...
Read more
-
Ruining the Stonehenge World Heritage Site would be a grave, irreparable mistake. Why ruin something that has stood for hundreds of generations?
Future generations would be appalled at those who...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed road scheme because:
1. It will cause irreparable damage to a site not just of national but of global significance. It will also impact the important archaeology of the area...
Read more
-
I am staunchly against this proposal as I believe it to be a desecration of our historical landscape.
-
As an individual and a citizen of the British Isles I am shocked and concerned by the proposals around the Stonehenge site. This landmark is a true and irreplaceable representation of our nation's...
Read more