Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
Because of the irreparable damage to the important archeological remains at Blick Mead.
The objection of so many distinguished and thoughtful people knowledgable in the field has entirely changed...
Read more
-
Iam greatly disturbed by the plans for a tunnel under what is a sacred monument. The loss of the iconic and free view is unacceptable,as is the damage to the nature and countryside with what is a...
Read more
-
I submit that not enough attention is being given to the opinions of international bodies that have an interest in preserving the character of this historic site.
-
I wish to register as an Interested Party with respect to the proposed changes to the A303 in the vicinity of Stonehenge. I am a British Citizen and resident of the South West, wishing to represent my...
Read more
-
The sight of Stonehenge as it comes into view from the east is unforgettable at all times.
With the sun setting overhead it is truly magical.
This monument was given to the nation by Sir Cecil...
Read more
-
I would dislike seeing Stonehenge encroached upon.
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
• Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
• Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the building of a tunnel for several basic reasons.
1. The huge cost at a time when the country simply cannot afford it.
2. The simple building of another lane on the A303 would...
Read more
-
The proposed short tunnel will compromise the area around Stonehenge. The tunnel portals are much too close to the stones so their environment will be noisy rather than tranquil. The scheme fails to...
Read more
-
Damage has already been done by driving a bore hole through a Mesolithic platform. If this happens even before work gets under way, what damage can we expect when contractors with heavy plant are on...
Read more
-
I object to the current proposal for several reasons. Firstly there will be permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
Under section 35 of the Postal Services Act 2011 (the “Act”), Royal Mail has been designated by Ofcom as a provider of the Universal Postal Service. Royal Mail is the only such provider in the United...
Read more
-
I believe from the evidence I have seen that the plans will have a detrimental affect on Stonehenge. This listed site needs to be protected. Not enough has been done to look at alternatives. I...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
I have so many concerns about this....but in brief
-Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
-UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I believe construction regarding the road widening of the A303, Stonehenge will be irrevocably damaging to this ancient site, which should be considered as a whole, even extending to its horizons and...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned that this Stonehenge should be preserved in its entirety. I visit the stones often and my time there is extremely precious. I also drive past the site and the current view...
Read more
-
1) I believe that the proposed work will cause permanent damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, making impossible much overdue work to explore it in greater depth than ever...
Read more
-
This World Hertitage site should be preserved for future generations, intact, unspoiled undamaged.
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique and treasured National Monument
of great scientific and other valueror some it still has religious significance
and we have a duty as a nation to guaranteee protection of all...
Read more
-
I believe the current application will damage the World heritage Site, both its archaeology and its setting. UNESCO has said that it should not go ahead in its present form.
The traffic flow will be...
Read more
-
My representation is my concern for Stonehenge as a World Heritage Site, any planning application should not jeopardise this status. Stonehenge is an ancient monument which is visited by thousands of...
Read more