Filter

Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 101 to 150 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Peter Graves

    I want to put forwards an argument supporting the second crossing allowing traffic to have an alternative route and take traffic away from the Current crossing. There may be a need to improve... Read more

  • Peter Hill

    I am concerned about the crossing charges as there will be no viable way off crossing the river from kent without paying a fee

  • Peter Masson

    On completion of the project there will be a toll for users. And this being an additional cost for motorists in the south east.

  • Peter Saunders

    As a thirty-year resident of Chadwell St Mary I am aware of the above average incidence of respiratory ailments here. I have seen a substantial increase in all traffic locally, owing to new housing... Read more

  • Peter Skelton

    We need this cossing to alleviate the Dartford crossings

  • Phil Stanier

    I believe that the new crossing is needed and would like to be kept informed about the process.

  • Philip Rickard

    I am a regular user of the Dartford Crossing and a second crossing is required to cope with current traffic congestion.

  • Ralph Cochrane

    My representation will be based on the following: 1. Design and fit for purpose. Value for money. 2. Effect on the Environment, Noise, pollution, Human health, wildlife and habitats, green belts,... Read more

  • Ray Sheehan

    I have two but I suppose you could say, very similar:1, I’m more then worried about the noise pollution and all the inconvenience of a project that is going to take, let’s say two/ three yrs to... Read more

  • Raymond Jackson

    I believe this is a very necessary road and crossing to be built to reduce the congestion at the current Dartford Crossing. Whilst I am a car driver only I believe it will greatly improve truck... Read more

  • Rebekah Marsh

    In a broad sense I support the principle of the lower Thames crossing between Kent and Essex. I believe for optimum outcomes for the economies of Kent and Essex, the South East Region, the... Read more

  • Ripe Now Limited (Ripe Now Limited)

    Reference Lower Thames Crossing Dear Sir, The Lower Thames Crossing is really important to us as a business, it means we can get more reliable traffic in to us here in South Lincolnshire, more quickly... Read more

  • Robert Hall

    Sort out the traffic problems on joining the tunnel at the A2 before proceeding with this unpopular project. It’s going to destroy this area completely.

  • Robin Dodridge

    I simply wish to exhort the planning authorities to expedite the necessary planning permissions. To my mind, the application has already been through an extensive consultation process, within which I... Read more

  • Robin Eatwell

    I support this plan as the current arrangements for crossing the Thames are not sufficient for the needs of the existing population. And with housing continuing to grow the demand for access across... Read more

  • Roger Slade

    This proposed crossing does little to remedy the problems seen at Dartford on a regular basis but destroys communities and agricultural land.

  • Ronald F.C.Ower

    I am very concerned over if the project proceeds . The inconvenience to residents in North Ockendon ,Upminster and Cranham. Where it has been reported that Ockendon Road in particular could be blocked... Read more

  • Roy Clare

    I support the Lower Thames Crossing and welcome the details so far provided to the public. It is daily self-evident that a second crossing over the Thames is long overdue. The existing arrangements... Read more

  • Roy Meleady

    I believe the consultation has been flawed because I have attended several meetings and have had bridge experts fail to explain tunnel issues at each meeting. I have asked fo an expert who can discuss... Read more

  • Rydon Homes Limited (Rydon Homes Limited)

    The impact of the proposals on the village of Shorne with particular reference to it's setting within the Green Belt and traffic movement.

  • Sally Templeton

    Traffic congestion.

  • Simon Winter

    PLEASE. Make sure that sound control measures are substantial and adequate. The current noise from the M25 is awful and is making many peoples lives an abject misery, please please don’t add to this.

  • Stephen Brennan

    Concerns on proposed project; 1. South Ockendon where I live will be surrounded (if this project goes ahead) by three major arterial roads. This in short will mean we will be exposed to excessive... Read more

  • Stephen Clark

    Access points to the new road

  • Stephen Lang

    My personal main concerns include but are not limited to the following points.... - Would not solve the problems suffered at the Dartford Crossing yet also create further congestion points. - The... Read more

  • Stephen Ray

    Local resident who will be impacted by the scheme and so will review and comment on the local issues and local impacts.

  • Stuart Holpin

    I am fully in favour of the works as this will help to improve the area and the current infrastructure

  • Terence Haines

    Concern about the effect of major works and activities on Thames Chase open space and its short & longterm impact on vegetation & wildlife.

  • Tevva Motors (Tevva Motors)

    On behalf of Tevva Motors (Battery Electric and Hydrogen Electric Lorries) we wholly support the this project and in particular the aims to deliver the project at the lowest possible carbon intensity.

  • Thames and Medway Canal Association (Thames and Medway Canal Association)

    My interest is to ensure that both the canal and towpath are not permanently adversely affected by the construction of a 'temporary' plant compound adjacent to the canal at Milton Range. I trust more... Read more

  • Thamesview Camping (Thamesview Camping)

    Objection letter. For the avoidance of doubt, we whole heartedly object to the proposed land grab of our campsite and land under the guise of environmental mitigation. The proposed use would be to... Read more

  • Toby Larkin

    1) consultation 2) planning 3) future These are the areas I wish to submit on

  • Tony Silver

    Building the Lower Thames Crossing as proposed will not solve the problem at the current Dartford Crossing. Building another two two bore tunnels next to the current tunnels would be more flexible and... Read more

  • Trevor Barham

    Arrangements for emergency evacuation within tunnel. Will a new rule be introduced as Auto Stradas in Italy and AutoBahns in Germany where traffic must move over to Crash Barriers on Lane 3 and Lanes... Read more

  • Vincent Hancock

    Personal interests in flow of traffic affecting Dartford.

  • Wendy White

    I live in the area and strongly object to this project which will not resolve current traffic issues, creates air pollution and destroys countryside habitats and communities

  • William Watson

    I intend to comment on the traffic effects either positive or negative on the flow of traffic on the M25.

  • Alex Bigham

    This scheme seems like a positive idea. I'm just interested in being kept updated on this scheme.

  • Andrew Craig

    At a time of climate crisis, combined with increasing road congestion, a new road project such as this one is entirely wrong. We should be changing our transport system to reduce the need for people... Read more

  • Annette Fletcher

    As a longstanding resident of Orsett, with ongoing health issues exacerbated by pollution, I have a vested interest on several levels in the planning of the Lower Thames Crossing.

  • Carol Lawson

    Further to your confirmation that more traffic will be diverted on to th A1089 which runs along the back of residence in Baker Street, Orsett and Orsett Heath can consideration be given to putting up... Read more

  • Colin Dearman

    I would like to support the design as suggested in the most recent video fly-through, that I viewed 10/01/23, because the main connections do not include roundabouts to connect to other roads. I have... Read more

  • Dan Harwood

    I admire the engineering of this new crossing but wonder about the need for such an undertaking in view of our intent to reduce our carbon footprint.

  • David Archer

    The Lower Thames Crossing as currently proposed is going to cause more congestion on the M25 and will do little to alleviate congestion on that and surrounding roads. Many years ago, a full upgrade... Read more

  • David Spence

    As someone who has been held in slow moving traffic heading up the A2 and then been held up in heavy non-moving traffic jams at the Dartford crossing from both sides. This new Lower Thames crossing... Read more

  • Diana Childs

    The Lower Thames Crossing is too costly. It will relieve congestion in a very limited way because it will have to feed into existing roads within a very short distance from the crossing. The amount of... Read more

  • Duncan Victor Simons

    I am a interested party who would be an end user I already have a Dart Account assume this would be along those lines

  • Essex Wildlife Trust (Essex Wildlife Trust)

    In respect of this development environmental sustainability is a paramount concern. An additional road based crossing of the Lower Thames is not, in our view, environmentally sustainable. We believe... Read more

  • Frank Woollard

    The road where it crosses Orsett Fen via a viaduct will be an unsightly concrete mess on the only green belt area in Thurrock. The noise and pollution created will be immense and this will get worse... Read more

  • Frederick Kilner

    1. The new crossing will relieve the congestion on the existing Dartford crossing 2. From the fly through and the following text the work will be carbon neutral 3. Air pollution adjacent to the... Read more