Filter
Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1126 to 1148 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Stantec (Stantec) on behalf of Taylor Wimpey (Taylor Wimpey)

    This representation has been prepared by Stantec who are working on behalf of Taylor Wimpey (TW) in relation to their proposed development site know as ‘Land West of Hoo’ on the Hoo Peninsula in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • TfSE (TfSE)

    Transport for the South East (TfSE) is a sub-national transport body (STB), which provides a single voice on the transport interventions needed to support sustainable economic growth across its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Thames Crossing Action Group (Thames Crossing Action Group)

    We are strongly opposed to the proposed LTC. Evidence shows that the project fails to meet the scheme objectives. 6.6 million tonnes of carbon emissions is not compliant with Net Zero. There is no... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Thames Water (Thames Water)

    Thames Water have engaged with National Highways to address the risks of this scheme to our asset and its performance at Ockenden Road, Upminster, RM14 3QR. We have come to an agreement the terms of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Lichfields (Lichfields ) on behalf of The Church Commissioners for England (The Church Commissioners for England )

    The Church Commissioners for England (CCE) manage the historic property assets of the Church of England. Their Strategic Land Portfolio currently comprises circa 6,000 acres, with sites located... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • The Green Party of England and Wales (The Green Party of England and Wales)

    The representation I intend to submit relates to the carbon emissions from these proposals and the damage to the environment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Barton Willmore, now Stantec (Barton Willmore, now Stantec) on behalf of The Hoo Consortium (The Hoo Consortium)

    Barton Willmore, now Stantec acts on behalf of the Hoo Consortium, which comprises the following 5No parties: • Church Commissioners • Dean Lewis Estates • Gladman Developments • Redrow Homes • Taylor... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Thibault Jeakings

    I am concerned about the following points: - Induced demand creating more traffic, congestion and pollution for surrounding areas. - Increased carbon emissions as a result of the above. - Lack of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Tom Benton

    I object to the Lower Thames Crossing proposal. The new NMUs will cause a lot of problems with unauthorised access and anti social problems. We already get off road motorbikes, quads and 4x4s... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Tony Bosworth

    I object to the scheme. It is entirely wrong to increase traffic and carbon emissions in a climate emergency.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Tracey Crouch CBE MP

    I am writing as the Member of Parliament for Chatham & Aylesford in order to register as an Interested Party for the upcoming inspection of the Lower Thames Crossing Development Consent Order. I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Transport Action Network (Transport Action Network)

    Transport Action Network OBJECTS to the DCO application for the Lower Thames Crossing. Our objection includes but is not limited to: CLIMATE CHANGE - the scheme would increase traffic growth leading... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Transport for London (Transport for London)

    1. Introduction 1.1 Transport for London (TfL) is the integrated transport authority for Greater London, responsible for delivering the commitments in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy and London Plan.... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Trina Dunk

    I object to the proposed lower thames crossing for the following reasons : I have lived in the gravesham area for 58 years and the destruction of land during the build will Destroy and impact... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Valerie Adams

    Pollution and Air Quality Destruction of Green belt Wild life habitats Noise barrier

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Hogan Lovells International LLP (Hogan Lovells International LLP) on behalf of Veolia ES Landfill Limited (Veolia ES Landfill Limited)

    Veolia is the owner and operator of the Ockendon landfill site at Medebridge Road, South Ockendon RM16 5TZ (the "Site"). The Site is within the order limits of the project (see Sheets 30, 34, 35, 36,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Vince Knight

    I am opposed to having this on our doorstep and the pollution and noise it will bring, further harming our health and that of our children. Spoiling our countryside and view is scandalous.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Wayne Sibley

    I object to this project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Wayne Thacker

    Environmental damage pre-construction, construction and post-construction. Vast carbon emissions! The cost of production. The negative impact on historic communities. Carving up and division of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • William Embliss

    I object to the proposed new Lower Thames crossing because as a country we need to achieve net Zero by 2050. Building a bridge that will encourage use of polluting vehicles that will create tons of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Woodland Trust (Woodland Trust)

    Dear Planning Inspector, The Woodland Trust is the UK's leading woodland conservation charity, aiming to protect native woods, trees and their wildlife for the future. We own over 1,000 sites across... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Zoe Connell

    I think this will be really bad for biodiversity and local wildlife’s

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 24 February 2023

  • Holland Land and Property (Holland Land and Property) on behalf of Linford Land Group and Mulberry Strategic Land Ltd (Linford Land Group and Mulberry Strategic Land Ltd)

    CA REG RR Dear Sir/Madam On behalf of our clients, Linford Land Group (AP1631) and Mulberry Strategic Land Ltd (AP1581) we write in respect of MRC03 and with reference to our previous representations... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 November 2023