Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
The already increasing fumes and noise will get even worse and make using outside spaces impossible for any form of socialisation as the noise from the planes forces you to stop talking as its too...
Read more
-
I do not believe this is the right decision for our area. I oppose this Gatwick northern runway application. Inunderstand that it will help jobs and Gatwick to grow. However, the infrastructure of the...
Read more
-
It is good for the economy
-
I am hugely concerned about the increase in carbon and noise pollution that this would cause. My area is already above WHO recommended levels of air toxicity and I’m especially worried for vulnerable...
Read more
-
Noise and polution
-
I think this will be good for the local and wider economy. It will also reduce the current delays experienced during peak periods
-
1. Gatwick claims that that many thousands of new jobs will be created and presents this as an advantage. On the contrary, it will impact negatively. There is already a severe shortage of housing in...
Read more
-
Flight Path and Flight Times
-
We lie under the landing flight path for the prevailing westerly wind conditions. During summer weekends flights start at 0630 and continue at up to every 2-3 minute intervals through til late. We...
Read more
-
I object to this for environmental reasons and the noise impact it will have on my home.
-
Great idea
-
I live in Redhill. I don't see why this is required.
-
I support the use of the emergency runway being used as a second full time runway.
-
I think is a good idea as it will generate business for the town
-
I am concerned about flight paths and noise. A second runway will increase the number of aircraft forcing new flight paths over the countryside and communities who already have to deal with flights...
Read more
-
I live in (Redacted) which is a rural location in an area of outstanding natural beauty. My home is impacted by flights arriving and departing from Gatwick airport. In the operation of Gatwick airport...
Read more
-
I’m ok with Gatwick new plans for growing the number of flights and be able to use the second runaway.
-
This is a terrible idea. The environmental impact of further air travel is terrible. The impact on the local area, the carbon footprint of all the concrete. This is terrible.
-
The proposal would have a huge impact on local air quality, local noise pollution, residential amenity and the environment generally. I also don’t think it would deliver the anticipated economic...
Read more
-
Safety its an emergency runway
-
My main concerns with this proposal are: 1) increased noise levels in the local area due to increased air traffic; 2) increased air traffic will increase carbon emissions when we are in a climate...
Read more
-
We would like to object to the proposal to develop a second runway operation at Gatwick Airport for the following reasons: Expansion of aviation would contradict policies to reduce carbon emissions....
Read more
-
There is a near continuous drone / noise pollution from the airport, this goes on to the early hours well after last flight affecting local residents and sleep, it can be difficult to be outside in my...
Read more
-
We must all get behind and support a growing industry.
-
This second runway should not have permission to go ahead as it completely contradicts the net zero targets, causes pollution, noise and increases traffic on the roads.