Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Increased Opportunity
-
There are several reasons why this proposal is unacceptable : 1. There is a climate emergency and an extra flights should be banned. 2. There is enough noise pollution affecting our rural village...
Read more
-
I am completely opposed to any expansion of Gatwick airport for the following reasons: - At a time when we as a country are seeking to be a global leader in the reduction of greenhouse emissions and...
Read more
-
This is a clear and blatant attempt to expand capacity at Gatwick Airport without going through the statutory planning reviews and procedures. This is a way of gaming the system to get a second runway...
Read more
-
The project should go ahead to alleviate the capacity issue in the south east
-
If this is approved our lives will inevitably be affected - more fine particulates on our air affecting our health, 24/7 noise from concentrated runway use as the plan looks to fly the planes directly...
Read more
-
The noise will be increased to what is stated by LGW is understated. I moved to Smallfield in 2011 & understood the current airport operations with one runway. With the addition increase in flights &...
Read more
-
Cannot believe Gatwick is really in need of more money when they should be advocating reducing pollution and protecting the environment.
-
We are supposed to be going greener. Yet you want more air craft in the sky, more pollution, more noise. Plus's Mors cars in this small area all trying to get to the air port
-
I'm very happy for Gatwick Airport to start using a second Runway.
-
The airport, post Covid, has not yet returned to its previous operational capacity. I would like to know (a) when Gatwick is projected to return to that level and (b) when Gatwick are expecting the...
Read more
-
This has been going on so long just let Gatwick get on and do it. More and more people want to fly and be able to do it without too much congestion. A project like this will create employment and...
Read more
-
Objection to building a second runway at Gatwick
-
The noise, the pollution and the (scary) impacts on climate change mean that the airport should shrink, not expand.
-
I fully support the Gatwick Airport and the growth it requires. This would benefit the community for additional work for locals and the area, bringing more tourists into the area and beyond
-
We have lived under the blight of a 2nd runway since 2009 when we were told that our property would be incorporated into the proposed scheme, effectively being compulsorily purchased. However, after...
Read more
-
There should be no airport expansion anywhere, we are facing climate breakdown and flying is one of the worst offenders in terms of fossil fuel and there is no credible alternative despite the...
Read more
-
Gatwick Diamond Business is a not-for-profit membership organisation with London Gatwick Airport at the heart of our region. We've been in existence for almost 70 years, supporting local businesses...
Read more
-
Gatwick is a key economic driver in the region and a second runway is overdue!! Stop delaying and crack on with the job.
-
I am 100% for this application
-
I think this is a great benefit to the local economy with careful consideration having been taking to minimise environmental impact.
-
Low flying, increased noise pollution, poor infrastructure, lack of transport, increased pollution generally, lack of housing, a poorer quality of life. Noise, not enough infrastructure, not enough...
Read more
-
The airport is currently struggling to run 1 Runway with any efficiency. It cannot handle another one. This is not due to capacity. It appears mainly to be employment issues e.g: There is not enough...
Read more
-
I live in Maidenbower, which is situated approx midpoint and south of Gatwick airports existing main runway. I have lived here for approx 20 years. 1) Noise, yes a/c are quieter but the ever...
Read more
-
We have to look at the future needs how we can improve ourselves with competitive world Firstly Employment oppertunity DEVELOPMENT NEW INFRASTRUCTURE GROWTH THESE ARE ALL INTERCONNECTED Love...
Read more
-
I am fully supportive of the project as it makes the best use of the existing runways, brings infrastructure improvements & services demand.
-
An improvement on the current situation, but maybe only a stop gap before a full on remodel with a full second runway as it should be. Long overdue. As a local resident I see it as a good thing...
Read more
-
Increase in aircraft traffic and noise especially overnight between midnight and 6am Increase in noise and night flights plus impact on the environment
-
I whole heartedly support the Northern Runway as it will be a great boost for the local economy and will ensure much need growth in the area. I would like to see some mitigations to ensure that...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the expansion of Gatwick Airport for the reasons given below. The Gatwick Coordination Group set out its objections to the Gatwick proposal in its response to the Airports...
Read more
-
On behalf of Rusper Parish Council, we are concerned as to the consequences of the expansion of Gatwick Airport - both as regards an increase in noise and pollution as well as the impact on the likely...
Read more
-
Currently the infrastructure that is in place and that is being proposed is not sufficient. We currently have a build up of car parking companies who use Road as a race track. Gatwick have no interest...
Read more
-
Great for infrastructure, great for economy, great for jobs.
-
The proposed project will have negative impacts by reducing air quality from emissions, increasing noise pollution from additional air traffic, and devaluing property values
-
Since moving to this property the flightpath has already moved closer, now it looks like it will be moving closer again to almost over my property. The noise is unacceptable now when taking off you...
Read more
-
Registering to vote against Gatwicks extra runway
-
One Resourcing is a an aviation and airport recruitment specialist business based in Crawley, West Sussex. I am the Managing Director and truly believe that the planning application for the Gatwick...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport directly benefits the local community with jobs and bringing in tourists to the area - It has for over 10 years had a huge benefit on my small business. It would not be what it is...
Read more
-
Gatwick’s punctuality suffers badly as a result of its single runway. Recent events have shown how the airport’s punctuality would improve with the use of a second short runway. The UK, regional and...
Read more
-
i am in favour of this project
-
I believe this is a good plan and should go ahead
-
There is a climate emergency This application will escalate emissions Noise is a major problem for this airport and with their FASIS plans our home will be destroyed in quality of well-being and...
Read more
-
The increased air traffic is not a good thing for the local community. We are right on the flight path & the planes are already loud. We do not benefit from any help to upgrade our windows. The...
Read more
-
As a fellow driver of the regional economy Shoreham Port supports the development of the Northern Runway at Gatwick Airport. This area of the south east needs unlocking in terms of logistics and...
Read more
-
Gatwick Airport is an economic powerhouse within the South East and approval of this Northern Runway will provide massive benefits for the region. The impact on economies across the local authorities...
Read more
-
This would provide more jobs for the Gatwick/Crawley area and additional destinations for travel.
-
Climate change justification of extra CO2 emissions? Drainage and infrastructure implications for the whole area especially the River Mole. Noise to all flight path areas. It is easy to claim...
Read more
-
As someone who worked at Gatwick before the pandemic, I believe aviation is essential to the local and national economy. The northern runway project will help this by increasing movements without the...
Read more
-
Additional flights will create noise and air pollution and further damage the lives of people on Gatwick flight paths and of the natural environment we must fight to preserve for ourselves and future...
Read more
-
Please see below a copy of the representations previously submitted by TWBC. December 2021 Response from Tunbridge Wells Borough Council to Gatwick Northern Runway Consultation Questionnaire. Q1 To...
Read more
-
The economic benefits and local infrastructure can only benefit from a fully functional Airport, the Northern runway will make the airport more fluid which will save fuel so also benefits the...
Read more
-
Are Concern is the negative impact on our parish from aircraft noise, pollution and extremely low flying planes
-
This proposed new runway will increase flight traffic directly over my house and will not only raise air pollution levels will also increase noise dramatically. This plan will also have a dire impact...
Read more
-
As a local authority, immediately below the current flight path, the Council is interested as to how a second runway will impact upon the lives of its residents and businesses, both in terms of...
Read more
-
Chichester College Group supports the proposed Gatwick Airport Runway Project. Whilst we fully understand and appreciate some of negative affects, but we believe overall the the positives...
Read more
-
It will improve the local economy and boost the local areas
-
The overall net benefit of the scheme does not seem to account for the wider environmental impact cost. The Detrimental effects of noise levels are not transparent.
-
I am a resident who lives adjacent to the flight path. The additional runway went to Heathrow and this makes a mockery of that process. This will add to air pollution, noise pollution, traffic and a...
Read more
-
As part of the planning condition I would like the following included: Point 1 Install strict night flight curfews to allow respite Point 2 When wind condition allow, ensure swap of landing directions...
Read more
-
I believe it should happen, It will boost Sussex and Surrey trade with the world, also it would increase the number of jobs in the area, especially for students especially working in the retail at...
Read more
-
I live near and I want to see the plans and how this may affect my home and family
-
I live under the flight path approaching Gatwick Airport (when the wind is from the West) and the planes are fairly low overhead - we can see them putting their wheels down. My main concerns are: a)...
Read more
-
We already have a lot of planes flying near to our houses and only stopping for a few hours during the night. The plan to have another runway is unacceptable because of increased noise and pollution....
Read more
-
My comments are in opposition of this planned activity. Already there is significant air pollution and noise caused by Gatwick airport. Despite not being in the major flight pattern there is...
Read more
-
London Gatwick describe the Project as “low impact” yet the proposal is for significant new airport infrastructure, hotels, offices, taxi way, car parks as well as an increase in passenger numbers...
Read more
-
1. House Price Value due to noise pollution. How do residents prepare for this? Will we be compensated? 2. Commuting to work via local roads which will experience a higher level of traffic. Also an...
Read more
-
To keep abreast of the changes and how this will affect roads and access to our business and any health & safety issues to our colleagues. Also the change to our current boundary and the effects this...
Read more
-
Aircraft noise, especially in early and late hours, has become much worse in recent years, leading to an adverse effect on life and increased levels of (redacted). At times, flight after flight flies...
Read more
-
I would like to have more detail on the economic benefits of the project to the local community. There is no breakdown on how this has been calculated and it appears to have been exaggerated. In...
Read more
-
No matter how much the plans say they are considering the impact of noise and air pollution, neither can be mitigated for hence I do not agree with the development.
-
increased number of noisy low flying planes at all times of the day and night. With a second runway which is an emergency run way this will only increase. The smell of plane fuel can be smelt...
Read more
-
The Brighton & Hove Economic Partnership is primarily interested in the economic impact of the scheme and value added in terms of jobs and tourism. Current figures suggest that the expansion activity...
Read more
-
I am totally opposed to expansion at Gatwick. With global warming evident, more traffic at Gatwick in the air and on the road will make climate change even worse. Gatwick brings misery to residents...
Read more
-
This is described as national infrastructure. However the benefits will accrue to a private company. The government's Climate Commission has stated that no airports should expand because of the...
Read more
-
Alongside the obvious increase in noise, carbon emissions, pollution etc. As it is effectively a rural airport which operates 24/7, this would impact several areas of outstanding natural beauty...
Read more
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
I am against the proposal. Higher pollution levels from increased cars and flights will adversely affect people's health in the area. The M25 and other roads to Gatwick are already extremely busy,...
Read more
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
Im am commenting in support of the proposed project. At the forefront of Sussex Wine Tourism, we have seen an increase in private and business travellers visiting the area. Increase in capacity and...
Read more
-
The new runway will result in an unacceptable increase in departure noise to the historic town of Reigate, which already suffers from this problem. It should not happen due to increased disturbance to...
Read more
-
London is the world’s biggest air travel hub, but our airport infrastructure is struggling to cope. This is the most practical short term fix to the problem. Please allow it to proceed for the benefit...
Read more
-
Will there will be any potential new routes over Warnham. What will be the likely hours of operation. What increase in traffic will there be. Will there be any changes to the existing current take-off...
Read more
-
Current level of flights causes noise and extreme pollution levels, without expansion. Flight paths are a noise intrusion
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
The increase in noise, carbon emissions, pollution and disruption to wildlife would be unbearable, as a rural airport which operates 24/7 it will impact several areas of outstanding natural beauty,...
Read more
-
As a local resident living close to Gatwick Airport I object to any plans to increase flight arrivals and departures at the Airport. We already have a considerable number of jets overflying Horsham...
Read more
-
Concerns over increased aircraft raffic due to rojpect
-
Living in the vicinity of Gatwick Airport is already challenging enough at most times, without these extra works. The plane noise can be unbearable at times, and doubling that would honestly, without...
Read more
-
I support the expansion of Gatwick airport as it will bring jobs and growth to the surrounding areas, a second runway was needed years ago. Aircraft noise and emissions are a fraction of what they...
Read more
-
Utilising the existing Northern Runway will boost the local economy, creating jobs and prosperity all around the airport including where I live in Reigate and Banstead borough. Securing growth for the...
Read more
-
A second runway will destroy the village of Charlwood and other surrounding villages. Even with a noise envelope it will significantly worsen the noise and air pollution. This goes against the UK's...
Read more
-
I am very much in support of this project. It is important for the area that Gatwick Airport remains a major airport for the UK. It needs more capacity to be able to offer the range of destinations...
Read more
-
This project is vital for the health and wealth of the region. With the government having failed to offer the second runway to Gatwick, now highly unlikely to be built by Heathrow, that was a huge...
Read more
-
On the whole we are very positive about the proposal. Our only concern will be to ensure that the infrastructure in terms of roads and housing will be sufficient to accommodate the increased activity...
Read more
-
Worried about increased traffic, pollution and noise impacts on locality. As well as a personal interest in changes to the local environment specifically around land usage on Riverside and Cheyne...
Read more
-
Plans for 100,000 additional flights and 1m tonnes of CO2 in a rapidly escalating climate emergency is complete anathema; it directly conflicts with the government's legal and moral duty to tackle...
Read more
-
Pro expansion. A great thing for local Communities
-
Gatwick desperately requires a second runway and is long overdue. Gatwick provides itself as an established alternative to the slot-constrained Heathrow and over the past year, has seen a...
Read more
-
I want Gatwick to have more scheduled connectivity to the world in general but to the USA and India in particular. Although Air India's recent direct services to India from LGW are welcome, travel to...
Read more
-
Increased noise Increase aircraft movement and increased pollution Night flights - over the last 20 odd years these have already significantly increased Detrimental effect to house prices in the area...
Read more