The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.
-
Query regarding timetable of decision by the Secretary of State - Please see attachment
-
Query with regard to the calculation of the final fee payable in respect of the Ipswich Chord application.
Please see attachment
-
Query with regard to Ms Peck and payment of compensation - Please see attachment
-
Please see email correspondence attached.
-
Request for developer to be notified of the matters to be discussed at the specific issue hearing.
-
Phone call asking for clarification on the items listed in the hearing agendas, in particular as the applicant was concerned they had not given an adequate response to the ExA further questions under...
Read more
-
When we spoke on 17th January I pressed for Network Rail to be notified of the subject matter of the specific issue hearing more than the week you said we might expect. You assured me that we would...
Read more
-
The enquirer sought clarification on of the following points regarding the ExA?s requests for further information (Annex A to his letter dated 13th January 2012).
Land Plans
The question...
Read more
-
Please see attached email thread
-
Please see attached letter from the Treasury Solicitor?s Office dated 30 November 2011
-
Please see attached letter from NatWest dated 29 November 2011
-
Please see attached letter from HSBC plc dated 30 November 2011
-
Examining authority?s Site Inspection in the company of interested parties.
-
Margaret Barry of the Treasury Solicitor's called in regard to the recently issued Rule 9 'notice of procedural decision' letter for the Ipswich Rail Chord. Ms Barry queried the land in question and...
Read more
-
The caller implied that Waveney, Lower Yare and Lothingland Internal Drainage Board should not have been consulted with regard to the proposed Ipswich Rail Chord as the development would lie outside...
Read more
-
Wales & West Utilities implied that they should not have been consulted with regard to the proposed Ipswich Rail Chord as they have no interest in areas outside the Wales & West area of the United...
Read more
-
Have the any colleagues from the River Action Group registered their interest for this proposal? If not is it too late?
-
Simon Mitchell from OFCOM queried why OFCOM have received the Rules 6 & 9 letters recently issued by the IPC. The query suggested confirmation of the bodies status under the Planning Act 2008.
-
Enquirer received correspondence from the IPC on 12 October confirming their organisation to be an 'interested party'. Enquirer sought clarification why they had been identified as an interested...
Read more
-
Enquirer had received a letter from the Commission detailing the time, date and place of the forthcoming preliminary meeting and had the following questions:
- What is the reason of the...
Read more
-
What happens following on from the developer's submission of the s56 and s59 certificates. What pre-examination fee should the developer budget for.
-
Making representations on compulsory acquisition matters
-
Enquirer wished to complete a relevant representation form on client?s behalf however was concerned that an alternative representative may be used in the future.
-
Thank you for telephoning earlier today. I think the answers below reflect what you told me, but shroud be grateful if you would confirm.
On the question of redacted particulars, the absence...
Read more
-
Network Rail submitted draft documents, including the draft DCO and explanatory memorandum, to the IPC for comment