Filter
East Anglia TWO Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 326 to 350 of 833 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • St. Andrew's, Aldringham Parochial Church Council (St. Andrew's, Aldringham Parochial Church Council)

    Aldringham church serves the people of Aldringham and Thorpeness both of which communities are severely affected by your proposals. In particular, Thorpeness with its fragile crumbling cliffs is not a... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Stanley Spilman

    I would first like to say that I hope that the Irony of trying to legislate against 'representations' that are not 'vexatious' is not lost on the Planning Inspectorate. The amount of fear, frustration... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Stephanie Powell

    I strongly object to the ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons:- Traffic The local road network is wholly unsuitable for the high levels of traffic and especially the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Steven Burch

    Having taken a considerable time to go through the whole planning application by Scottish Power Renewables i strongly object for the following main reasons. Destruction of ancient woodland and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • The Fryers (The Fryers)

    Dear Planning Inspectors We would like to make our objections known to Scottish Powers EAN1 and EA2 DCO application as follows: a. The Thorpeness Cliffs are too fragile to drill and run cables under... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Wendy Margoram

    Dear Sirs, Please find my objections to EAN1 and EA2; The Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects occurring consecutively over 12 to 15 years Unsuitability and fragility of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • William Matthew

    - I disagree with the project and its location and do not want it to go ahead. - This project in its entirety appears to be totally at odds with the fact that this is a designated AONB. The idea that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • [Mirriam] Jan MacKenzie

    We, in this area, have had up to seven energy projects occurring consecutively over 12 - 15 years. The cumulative impact of this has already been felt. This new projects plans to use unspoilt... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Aldeburgh Society (Aldeburgh Society )

    The Aldeburgh Society is a civic society devoted to protecting the urban environment in the historic coastal town of Aldeburgh. We are concerned about the many major infrastructure projects, and SPR... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Anita Parkinson

    We are strongly opposed to the proposed development at Friston for the following reasons: 1. There will be an unacceptable cumulative impact on the area with the proposed energy developments at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Antonia Owen

    Dear Examining Authority RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons: * The unsuitability and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Antony Easton

    RE: EAST ANGLIA TWO I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: - Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects occurring... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Carolyn Ridgeon

    I am writing as I have before because we have lived in Friston for 32 years and this proposed development is causing tremendous anxiety. This is a beautiful rural area and historically an arable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Charles Read

    I wish to object to the Scottish Power Renewables planning application for East Anglia Two on the following grounds: Cumulative Impacts The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment)... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Charles Scott

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: ? Cumulative impact on local communities of un-interrelated energy projects occurring consecutively... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Clare Palmier

    1.The Suffolk coast is an essential cultural, natural and heritage asset for the area and integral to its local economy and community. 2. Much of the coastline is AONB and should be protected as such.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • David Moon

    I would like to raise my objection to the planning application for offshore Windfarm two, below are my reason for objecting >Destruction of woodland and the fragile environment and eco-system that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Deborah Collis

    Severe detrimental Impact of onshore facilities especially transport infrastructure upon the local environment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Derek Turner

    We are strongly opposed to the proposed development at Friston for the following reasons: 1. There will be an unacceptable cumulative impact on the area with the proposed energy developments at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Dr Graham Tattersall

    Construction of a the EA2 windfarm substation in the village of Friston will have the following specific consequences: * Destruction of a rural landscape that is valued by residents of Friston and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • East Suffolk Council (East Suffolk Council)

    Please be advised that East Suffolk Council intends to provide a separate written submission via e-mail to the Planning Inspectorate by the deadline of 27 January 2020.

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Edward Twort

    Two trenches the width of the M25 EACH are about to be dug out by Scottish Power from Thorpeness to Friston causing chaos on the roads, to our business and destroying the cliffs at Thorpeness. It's... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Frances Cahill

    *The proposed development would irreversibly damage the environment in an area designated as a heritage coast and of outstanding natural beauty. This harm would be: 1. Visual - namely to the look of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Hugh Butterworth

    My name is Hugh Butterworth and I am resident in Thorpeness and am affected by Scottish Power's proposals and wish to object because: - this fragile area of the Suffolk coastline is threatened by the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020

  • Ian Wiles

    This proposal is ridiculous, SSE have not listened to the govenment, local goverment, businesses and local residents. It would seem that SSE have purchased the land before any consultancy with any of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 January 2020