Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
As a local resident I believe this land should remain as farming land. This project is planned with short term benefits in mind. We will need our agricultural land into the coming years - population...
Read more
-
Farmers allowing the use of good agricultural land have become turncoats and taken the Kings shilling. We are surrounded by notices keep out, get off my land, private. They despise the public, yet...
Read more
-
This solar farm is going to decimate the countryside around stamford and impact all the villages to the north east of the time. The Secretary of State has just announced the need for access to the...
Read more
-
Extra traffic and restrictions on dog walking. Excess noise and disturbance to wildlife impacting on mental health.Compulsory aquirement of my land which I previously knew nothing about.
-
We live in a beautiful productive area and can not understand why good quality farmland will be taken out of production when as a country we need more self sufficiency. To spend the rest of my life...
Read more
-
[redacted] are a Chinese Company, the panels would be assembled in China. DONOT support PRChina by awarding this contract. Great Britain should be utilising Business and Companies from friendly...
Read more
-
This project will not only visually ruin a beautiful area of open land, it will remove the habitat of the local wildlife. I am also concerned that the already damaged local roads are not up to the...
Read more
-
too large on very good farm land.too near villages .the building will bad extra heavy traffic. bad to excise my horse not a inefficient as a source of energy.who will clear up at the end
-
. Loss of valuable farming land . Disruption to area by heavy traffic . The vista!
-
The problem with this project is that it is far too big for a rural village location and solar farms should not be placed on good farm land that is needed to feed our growing nation. The government...
Read more
-
Solar panels will be 3.3m high security fencing and CCTV, solar stations or shipping containers housing inverters/transformers dotted across the solar area. New sub-station will be visible & audible...
Read more
-
Far too big a site. Solar panels should be on roofs not arable land.
-
My initial comments are that this would be a VAST solar farm in an area of natural beauty, farm land, listed buildings and beautiful villages, ancient woodland areas, wildlife and people who have...
Read more
-
There is no plan in place for the removal of the panels at the end of their life. The use of a village to house the high voltage cabling having lost the right to run along the railway line, is...
Read more
-
I am writing to express my massive concerns regarding this proposal to build this overwhelming solar farm in our tiny villages within Rutland. Rutland itself is the smallest county in England and has...
Read more
-
I feel this is totally unacceptable for this area mainly the village of Essendine which will be surrounded on three sides But my main concern is that I race pigeons international races included I will...
Read more
-
I am for solar energy but farmland should be used for farming, for food security. Solar should be on houses and land not suitable for farming. If there has to be a solar farm at Essendine, why can't...
Read more
-
Against Mallard Pass Solar. Landscape and habitats will be destroyed. Much better ways to do solar - on roof tops!!
-
I object to the development of this project on the grounds that it will clearly have an adverse impact on the environment.
-
It’s too big. Too much traffic during construction. Valuable arable land. Detrimental to wildlife and residents. Human rights issues with Chinese company producing them. British companies should be...
Read more
-
The huge scale of this development is disproportionate to a rural area near villages, particularly Essendine. It would convert our countryside into an industrial site covering 2,105 acres, of which...
Read more
-
The scale of the proposed site will hugely and adversely affect our local environment. It would take good farming land, at present producing food, out of production. The UK needs to keep farming land...
Read more
-
I am not satisfied that our environment in Stamford is being considered in this project. It will destroy a valuable amenity in the area and close off a 'Green lung' used by many to keep fit and 'live...
Read more
-
* There will be continuous noise, pollution, disruption, and damage to property and surrounding area. * It will increase the impact of heavy HGV lorries and project associated workforce and vehicles...
Read more
-
The profits of the proposed site will not , in my view, benefit the UK as the company who own Mallard Pass is not a UK one. The proposed site is larger than Westminster, imagine looking out the office...
Read more