Filter

Mallard Pass Solar Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 175 of 1223 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Osborne Clarke LLP (Osborne Clarke LLP) on behalf of National Grid Electricity Distribution (East Midlands) plc - Withdrawn (National Grid Electricity Distribution (East Midlands) plc - Withdrawn)

    1. Project Reference: EN010127. Submitted by Osborne Clarke LLP on behalf of National Grid Electricity Distribution (East Midlands) plc ("NGED"). 2. Osborne Clarke LLP act for NGED whose registered... Read more

  • Nick Saunders

    I am concerned both about the loss of agricultural land and community amenities, and frustrated by the developers high handed attitude towards the local community. The proposed project appears to... Read more

  • Rob Jones

    Having reviewed the proposals my belief is that the balance of national energy needs and carbon reduction commitments outweigh what are primarily local concerns around visual impacts and construction... Read more

  • Robert Hogg

    Covering hundreds of hectares of productive agricultural land with solar panels is totally counter-productive. Other concerns: Possible flooding issues The unsightly nature of the proposals in the... Read more

  • Royston Richards

    Completely wrong and stupid place to put such large development and loose farming land the roads are not built for this kind of construction a good place is x RAF sites like the one 5 miles west next... Read more

  • Ryhall Parish Council (Ryhall Parish Council)

    Ryhall Parish Council have canvased residents of the Parish who, in the majority, are against the Mallard Pass Solar factory. The main reasons being the impact on the surround landscape with its mass... Read more

  • Samuel Smith

    I strongly object to this development due to huge scale of it and significant detrimetnal impact a development of this size would have on the local environement. It would completely dominate a huge... Read more

  • Sandra Pell

    This development covers a huge area, taking up valuable agricultural land. It will also have a negative environmental impact as well as being a blot on the beautiful local landscape with absolutely no... Read more

  • Sarah Markwell-Cook

    I whole heartedly object to the planned proposal. We are in the middle of the countryside with roads that are not suitable for heavy traffic, single lane in most places, with deteriorating road... Read more

  • Susan Joan Robinson

    The Solar Farm site is far too big for the area, the undulating land is simply not suitable for solar panels and using it for this means that good agricultural land will be lost forever from the area.... Read more

  • Teresa Richards

    I strongly object to this project. It is far too large and will affect wildlife considerably, destroying good agricultural ground. Our wildlife population is suffering greatly already. We need the... Read more

  • Adrian Morrell

    The country is short of power, we need new providers urgently and this project meets that criteria. Having travelled in South Africa where in the Western Cape they are without power for up to 6 hours... Read more

  • Anne Stokes

    This proposal would cover an unprecedented vast swathe of prime agricultural land. At a time when as a country, we are aiming to maximise food production, it is perverse to cover such a huge area with... Read more

  • Clipsham Parish Meeting - Rutland (Clipsham Parish Meeting - Rutland)

    We believe that the massive scale of this development is highly damaging for Rutland. The development would lead to irreversible damage to the community due to the loss of quality, productive... Read more

  • Jason Clive Morten

    Whilst I am a supporter of green and renewable energy, I need to express my concern and objection to this proposal. It’s too big, impacts too much of the local wildlife and will increase the flooding... Read more

  • Jeremy Nicholas Boycott Thurston

    The proposed development is across a swathe of agricultural land and is of unprecedented size in the UK. This development is removing productive agricultural land, further increasing the need for the... Read more

  • Mr Richard Smith

    Loss of productive agricultural land REQUIRED for food production The proposal removes significant food producing land which is irreplaceable The land and ecology are precious to the well being of the... Read more

  • Peter David Thomas

    I recently moved to the village of Ryhall and spend a great deal of time walking through the surrounding countryside which is now planned for a complete transformation. The walks I enjoyed will no... Read more

  • Rotary Club of Stamford, club no - 19155 (Rotary Club of Stamford, club no - 19155)

    1. I Agree with the need for more electricity produced in an environmentally friendly way. 2. Why are you proposing to use grade 1 farming land, when there are many grey sites available locally ? 3.... Read more

  • C G Renner

    Not the best use of this farm land or resources. Loss of arable land

  • Martin Dovey

    Love solar BUT the size of this is completely ridiculous - destroying communities and years of amazing history.

  • Peter Williamson

    I hope the developers will be obligated to include substantial improvements to the local area including for the benefit of locals people, wildlife and economically. In favour of low carbon energy

  • Sarah Riddell

    Major concern on local impact

  • Sarah Sewell

    Concerns over noise during and after construction, destruction of agricultural land, wildlife. Affect on area, view, house prices. Ethics.

  • Shaden Hammami

    I object the proposed project Mallard Solar farm for the below reasons; 2 years of noise, light pollution, disruption and damage across 2,105 acre site and surrounding area. *Cabling to new... Read more