Filter
Viking CCS Pipeline

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 25 of 121 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Nigel Barker

    Why aren’t there more shut off valves in the 55km pipeline. Surely the more valves there are lessens the amount of Co2 that may potentially escape if there is a breach. Has Co2 been categorised yet as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 November 2023

  • Alison Beet

    I am very concerned about the health and safety of this project, especially that it is so close to people.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Andrew Tempest

    I object to this project,as it will industrialise a rural,agricultural, tourist area,and will have negative impacts on the rich wildlife and environment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Clare Barker

    It will cause chaos is the village. Leading to road closures. As a young family, we are busy and need to access school,clubs and health care easily. The pollution will hinder our health. 2 of us have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Gillian Henshaw

    The fear of this exploding or leaking is having a detrimental effect on my life and I and my family strongly oppose to the 25 metre vent stack and pipeline being being built in my village. The stack... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Guardians Of The East Coast (Guardians Of The East Coast)

    This dangerous unproven proposition is being railroaded onto the people of the East Coast of Lincolnshire. The safety case has not been met. The proposed venting of CO2 via a 25 metre vent stack close... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Jeanette Louise Tempest

    I have already responded via feedback during the consultation period, but in summary I am concerned about the proposal as I am not convinced from the information provided that carbon capture is safe... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Julie Sullivan

    Don't want it here. It has been already been proved not to work, in other countries around the world. Its a dangerous thing to be going under the field next to my house. Not only is it dangerous it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Kim Conroy

    I am completely against the proposal. I live within the area and do not want the risks associated with the project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Kristina Maria Mcgill

    completely reject this as well as the nuclear storage on our nature reserve at the Terminal . we were promised this land would go back to green when conico finished onsite.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Malcolm Grebby

    1) I attended 2 seminars at both I was told that the co2 produced was going to be the by product of Blue hydrogen. This is not the case. 2 Original plans did not show the ( pumping stations on route.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Margaret Kujawa

    You are proposing to put your pipeline down the side of my house, and a stack at the back of my house that will give off toxic CO2 every now and then, I do not think this is a very good idea when you... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Michael Glynne Crookes

    I do not believe that this proposal is safe. The unproven technology being used will have minimal effects on CO2 levels being taken out of the atmosphere but maximum opportunity to kill people if it... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Mrs Emma Owen

    We are sick and tired of all of this. Give the land back to agriculture as promised. Not to mention the fact that the impact everything has on the very near by nature reserves where there are rare... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Nicola Carden

    I don’t want it. Local people don’t want it.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Nikki Mccreight

    i object to it as i live in a house on the proposed project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Sarah Michelle Goodley

    This plan will obliterate the only safe footpath into Mablethorpe from Theddlethorpe. This is nearer domestic residence than the first 2 plans that were bad enough. This plan would destroy a very... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • The Gilyeat Family (The Gilyeat Family)

    We are not in favour of this project. We have asked for more information that lay people can understand but have been ignored.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Tim Watson

    I do not consent to having the only safe foot path to Mablethorpe altered or fenced in, I am also totally against the pipeline in any and all ways

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 November 2023

  • Beverley Seymore

    I have great concerns about carbon capture coming to Theddlethorpe. The main concern is the depth of the pipe, if this is fractured it will be life-threatening. I live a short distance from the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 November 2023

  • Louth Navigation Trust (Louth Navigation Trust)

    Louth navigation Trust are keen to ensure the pipeline passes underneath the canal and the river Lud using some form of directional drilling so as not to block the canal for water users. LNT are in... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 30 November 2023

  • Robert Palgrave

    This proposal facilitates the Capture and Storage of Carbon Dioxide, in an attempt to curb rising atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases which are the cause of global heating / anthropogenic climate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 December 2023

  • Elaine Dennis-Skuce

    I am against this project

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 December 2023

  • Kathleen Jane Webb

    Impact to residents Depth of pipeline Safety issues if pipe ruptures

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 December 2023

  • Martin Brady

    Technical and environmental impacts

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 December 2023