Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
“Couldn't find the freeway, had to take a backstreet called the M5.”
US Tourist explaining why they had arrived late for dinner in the Waldorf Salad episode of the classic comedy series Fawlty...
Read more
-
A waste of money, siphoning off a national asset, denying a free view for the public
-
I wish to oppose the application on the following grounds:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its...
Read more
-
Brian Edwards, Visiting Research Fellow, The Regional History Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol.
Deputy representative of the Avebury and Stonehenge Archaeological and Historical...
Read more
-
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form and I would agree with them.
-
I am concerned that the excavations for this project will irretrievably damage this UNESCO world heritage site. There have already been reports that the initial groundwork has had an effect and I do...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
There are many reasons why the tunnel should not be allowed to proceed inc the following in no order of importance or priority
1 Current cost is bound to escalate which cannot be justified in present...
Read more
-
I am registering as an objector to the current proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge.
The NNNPS section 5.129 requires that decision makers take into account "the particular nature of the...
Read more
-
lack of respect and protection for a sacred landscape
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international...
Read more
-
The A303 at Stonehenge is promoted as being part of a programme of improvements to unlock benefits for the South West economy, local communities and the Stonehenge World Heritage Site (WHS). However,...
Read more
-
As a British citizen following the ancient religious ways of my Ancestors. I frequently use the areas commonly known as Stonehenge and Avebury circle for my religeous ceremonies (it is a place where I...
Read more
-
Dear Sir or Madam, I have registered concerning Stonehenge Heritage Landscape. The reason why is simply because, I actually protest against the Architecture construction plan to go ahead. To be frank...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a World Heritage Site. UNESCO's advisers have stated that the planned scheme should not go ahead, and no acceptable plans have been made. Blick Mead Mesolithic site would be damaged,...
Read more
-
I wish to object to this proposal in the strongest possible terms. The dual carriageway would do irreparable damage to the World Heritage Site which UNESCO describes as "without parallel" and its...
Read more
-
1) I object to this Proposal on the grounds of the inevitable major disturbance, probable irreversible damage & possible destruction to an ancient & irreplaceable monument that the proposal will...
Read more
-
Stone Henge is an extremely important national heritage site that should be preserved and not compromised in any way. It belongs to the people of Great Britain and the area should not be interfered...
Read more
-
I believe that this world heritage site would be ruined...that endangered species would be lost.There are alternatives that have not been heard.
-
The plan will damage archaeology, as yet undiscovered above and below ground.
It will reduce opportunities for viewing Stonehenge from a distance, such as that from the present A303.
It will entail...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that such major construction is proposed for this work heritage site. The economic case is flawed: the problem very likely overstated and the case put forward fails to allow for...
Read more
-
destruction to historic sites of national and international importance
more and faster traffic
knock on effects to lead to ever more wider and higher capacity roads on this route and feeder roads...
Read more
-
I and my family have visited Stonehenge many times since I was a boy living in Dorset some 60 years ago, so I have a personal interest in trying to improve the local area to achieve a better...
Read more
-
My representation will cover the following issues:
- Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
- UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
UNESCO does not approve of the current scheme, this alone should be a huge red flag against the scheme as it stands.
The site is unique and only if the archaeology is preserved can it be subject to...
Read more
-
I am very concerned at the risk of irreparable harm being done to a unique archaeological site.
-
UNESCO object to this scheme and other options have not been adequately explored or represented.
-
This is a World Heritage Site and it is also of great historical, cultural and emotional significance to all British citizens. Unfortunately this scheme is exclusive in nature, effectively putting...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I am a concerned individual, and frequent user of the A303. I don't believe these works are justifiable to save a few minute's jorney time. I am concerned about permanent damage to the World Heritage...
Read more
-
I do not think that Highways England should persist in its idea to put a large duel carriage way in place which will negatively impact on the UNESCO / Stonehenge World Heritage Site.
I have...
Read more
-
The Council for British Archaeology has long maintained an interest in the protection, conservation, management and public understanding of the Stonehenge & Avebury World Heritage Site (WHS).
We...
Read more
-
1 . Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a "landscape without parallel", particularly in regard to the western section between the cut and Longbarrow...
Read more
-
CPRE SW represents the seven county branches in the South West of England and thousands of individual CPRE members. These comments add to and reiterate the concerns/objections already stated in our...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
My reason for completing this form include:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form....
Read more
-
1 - there is no clear evidence road congestion will be improved
2 - there is too much focus on 'bronze age henge' and not enough planning for mitigation of impacts on multiperiod landscape and...
Read more
-
No permanent plans to put through anything that could damage the site any further. It' had historic and ancient burial ground and should not be distributed in any way that could damage it and destroy...
Read more
-
The WHS is of global significance and much of the surrounding land has lain undisturbed and without proper academic archaeological investigation. The merits of a poorly located road build out are...
Read more
-
My main complaint is that this scheme in its current form irreparably damage the Stonehenge landscape for thousands of years to come and destroy fragile archaeology there needs to be preserved for...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the plans for the A303 near Stonehenge will, if they are approved, cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting and concerned about damage to...
Read more
-
Driving a road through this area would lead to a loss of knowledge and area which would be a catostrophe.
-
This is an OBJECTION to the scheme for a number of reasons but principally the irreparable damage this will cause to the archaeology and site setting including Blick Mead Mesolithic Site. The...
Read more
-
I am concerned if it is the case that the decision to proceed with this work is being taken without approval from UNESCO. Since one stated objective for the work is to restore the World Heritage Site...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is probably the most recognisable, iconic and well-regarded prehistoric site in the world. To construct a tunnel under it would both threaten o damage it, from the construction work itself,...
Read more
-
If the application for the dual carriage way is allowed to go ahead it will result in .Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, Stonehenge both in terms of its archaeology and setting.
....
Read more
-
I am seriously concerned about permanent damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
I am also worried about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
UNESCO's...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting. UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form. Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site...
Read more
-
These are all of my concerns:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the impact that the proposed works will have on the environment in an area of outstanding natural beauty
I believe that it is wrong to deprive people a free view of such an...
Read more
-
This road would mean irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more