Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
That the proposed scheme will cause severe, irreparable damage to the environs of Stonehenge to the detriment of its World Heritage status and future generations. It is not just about the henge...
Read more
-
Dear Sir
This is the most important archeological site in Britain. It needs to be treated as such not by having a tunnel that will damage the area during its construction but when built. Whilst not...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is unique; hence its UNESCO World Heritage status. There can be no justification in damaging any part of the site just as we would not allow damage to Hyde Park or York Minster. The...
Read more
-
I find it detrimental to the history of the historic monument that is Sonehenge to interfere with the surrounding area and to build more roads and an underpass. This will destroy one of our oldest...
Read more
-
The area of the A303 Stonehenge, is a World Heritage site, I strongly object to the new duel carriage highway intrusion. It should not go ahead in its present form. There has not been an alternative...
Read more
-
Concerns over the following: increased noise and air pollution due to elevation of the road in relation to our property, as well as increased volume and flow of traffic. Effect on the views from our...
Read more
-
I believe that the new expressway planned will cause permanent damage to the World Heritage site, a view shared with UNESCO itself.
-
The massive nature of the excavations and the roadworks themselves will dwarf the historic site, while at the same time the tunnel portals will be too close to the stones: a longer tunnel (though...
Read more
-
The proposed changes to the A303 are totally unsuitable.
-
• Irreparable damage to this unique, emblematic and vulnerable site, both the archaeology and setting, which is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
• UNESCO likewise recommends...
Read more
-
There are more than sufficient strong reasons for the Inpectorate to recommend refusal of this project. This should be refusal of the whole scheme. If the Examining Inspectors find reasons to...
Read more
-
The plans for the Stonehenge Tunnel as they currently stand have serious negative implications for the landscape, archaeology and surrounding environment,as follows :
· Irreparable damage to...
Read more
-
1) At a time when greenhouse gas driven climate change is an imminent world crisis, we should not be building more roads which increase the capacity of the road system.
2) Any major roadworks risks...
Read more
-
This site is a World Heritage site and should be preserved as such for future generations and not be endangered by highway expansion. Increased traffic volumes will increase atmospheric pollution and...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge landscape is unique, not only to England but around the world, and should be protected in perpetuity. The proposed works will cause irreparable damage to the surrounding area and are...
Read more
-
I think this scheme desecrates an ancient sacred landscape, the tunnel will further damage important archeological artefacts and the iconic view of Stonehenge from the road will be forever lost....
Read more
-
This scheme would cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, and no alternative non-damaging options have been offered.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme will cause devastating and permanent destruction to a unique and irreplaceable landscape, of world importance for its archaeological contents. UNESCO has advised against the...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is one of Britains most important sites, a jewel in our crown and of world importance archeologically.
Its natural beauty will be destroyed. It is described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape...
Read more
-
I am concerned that this road will cause damage to the world heritage site.
Why are there no alternatives in the plan, which would not damage or spoil the Stonehenge site?
Why has the UNESCO advice...
Read more
-
The extent and scale of the potential damage to the archaeology and setting of this unique World Heritage Site are poorly understood. We *do* need to listen to experts.
-
I am familiar with Salisbury Plain, Stonehenge and the A303. I have lived in the area for 12 years. I object to the length of the proposed tunnel being too short and damaging the landscape. I...
Read more
-
My view is that Stone Henge is Internationally famous. If we build a busy road too close to it there is absolutely no way to guarantee that the famous historical site will not suffer irreparable...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and Should be Preserved and the area around it by whatever means, Any work around & underneath it could Permanent damage this World Heritage Site, its...
Read more
-
Application by Highways England for an Order Granting Development Consent for the A303 Amesbury to Berwick Down
English Heritage relevant representation to Planning Inspectorate
10th January...
Read more
-
Dear Sirs
Esso Petroleum Company, Limited (Esso) and its agents, Fisher German, have been engaging with Highways England (HE) in relation their proposals for the A303 at Stonehenge (the Project)...
Read more
-
I'm very worried about the destructive effect that this new road will have on both the environment and on the archaeological value of the site. Clearly damage to the rivers is a very serious concern...
Read more
-
My concern is about the longterm effect of this project on the enviroment. The proposed planns will have a severe impact on the local geology. The area represents a point where many old paths/roads...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the huge amount of permanent damage to the setting and precious archaeology of the Stonehenge World Heritage site and its environs if this proposed scheme is allowed to go...
Read more
-
I am concerned that this proposal will cause irreparable damage to this world heritage site & to the archaeology within it. Also the setting & nature of the whole area will be adversely affected by...
Read more
-
“I OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application."
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National Infrastructure Commission, Office of Road & Rail and National Audit...
Read more
-
Relevant Representation from Friends of the Earth
The DCO should be rejected because:
1) It fails to meet the tests set out in the National Networks NPS that:
“the Secretary of State must...
Read more
-
• Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
• Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I am unhappy about the whole scheme, from the fact that no reasonable alternative was given during the consultation period to the lack of care given to the unique landscape.During the consultation...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an ancient site sacred to many who practice or are interested in the "Old Religion" of the British isles...believers assert that there are subtle energies which permeate and pervade at...
Read more
-
The site may yet reveal more.
-
I just wish to say that this is an Historical Site and any work being done in or around it would lead to earth subsidence or possible damage to the Stones themselves. There is no need to have a road...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers advise against the scheme in its present form.
Serious concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed scheme because I believe that:
a) its scale and form will inevitably result in irreparable damage being done to this World Heritage Site,
b) it is too easy a solution...
Read more
-
Great Bustards are listed as Annex 1 birds and designated vulnerable by the IUCN. The birds became extinct in the UK in the mid-1800s, the odd migrant bird has been recorded since.
The Great Bustard...
Read more
-
The Green Lane Association (GLASS) through local representation has been involved with the scheme through all of the Pre-application process and seek to continue involvement through the rest of the...
Read more
-
Introduction
The Green Lanes Environmental Action Movement (GLEAM) was founded in 1995 to campaign for changes in the law of England and Wales to stop off-road drivers damaging or destroying green...
Read more
-
I am concerned that the proposed expressway will do irreparable damage to the character and the significance of the Stonehenge site, surroundings, and valuable natural environment, simply by the...
Read more
-
The proposal will cause irreparable damage to Stonehenge, a world heritage site, and also to Blick Mead, as well as threatening endangered bird species.
In view of the UNESCO status and the advice...
Read more
-
The Heart of the South West Local Enterprise Partnership strongly supports the Department for Transport’s ongoing commitment to improving this vital strategic corridor between London and the South...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
object to stonehenge tunnel
-
I object to the A303 Stonehenge scheme going ahead because: 1) There will be permanent damage to a World Heritage Site and UNESCO Advisers (who know what they are talking about) say it should not go...
Read more
-
Don't build it. The land through which the tunnel would go is too precious. Ignore the congestion in the south and improve transport in the north of England. Maybe implement a congestion charge on the...
Read more
-
Dear Sirs,
I use the A303 frequently and although it is annoying when you reach Stonehenge and it's environs when it has bottle necked and you are slowly having to get through it which can take up...
Read more