Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
This scheme will cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
I have concerns about...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
That the proposed works will irreparably damage this unique archeological landscape.
-
Stonehenge A303 Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010025
ICOMOS-UK wishes to register as an Interested Party for the Examination of the above application for development.
ICOMOS-UK is concerned...
Read more
-
I am concerned about the prosed plans and the permanent damage these would cause to one of England's most Sacred ancient sites, a World Heritage Site, its archaeology and its setting. It is clear this...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned by this proposal and do not believe it should go ahead.
-
I am concerned about the damage and disturbance this would cause to this World Heritage sacred site, including noise pollution.
-
1. It is applying an old approach to a problem without considering implications of new technology on future transport systems e.g. driverless cars
2. There is much important archaeology e.g....
Read more
-
I object to the proposed A303 road /tunnel development around the Stonehenge World Heritage site because it will irreparably damage and destroy the important archaeology in the surrounding area. Proof...
Read more
-
For many years I have studied ancient sites and have visited many World Heritage sites across the globe
One of the things that I have come to realise is that almost ubiquitously there are signs of...
Read more
-
The proposal is insufficiently sensitive to the special requirements of this unique site. The extremely important and rare nature of Stonehenge means we should not go nowhere near any semblance of...
Read more
-
The above plan will, in my view:
Cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting;
ignore UNESCO's advisers who say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I object to the current application on the following grounds:
I object to any further disturbance of this incredibly rich and vast area of prehistory
I object to the disturbance of any...
Read more
-
The new expressway could cause extreme damage to an amazing World Heritage Site.
UNESCO’s international advisers say the scheme should not go ahead.
There are also a lack of alternative options in...
Read more
-
I am very concerned that this proposed development will harm the environment and potentially risk losing the heritage status.
-
All my life I have dreamed of going to Stonehenge. It would be a horrible thing to have it undermined by tunneling on the grounds surrounding it. It would weaken the soil and cause the stones to fall....
Read more
-
The most important point that I hope the planning Inspectorate will consider is that the proposed scheme will cause permanent damage to the archaeology and setting of a unique World Heritage...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, it's archaeology and setting.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site and its setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead...
Read more
-
I oppose the plan to take the A303 under the plain near Stonehenge. Stonehenge is itself too important a monument to be put at risk by these works. The plan will also risk the disturbance and...
Read more
-
1. With thousands of motor vehicles passing by Stonehenge every day, there would be the risk that:
(a) Levels of nitrogen dioxide would increase to such an extent that over decades they would...
Read more
-
Ruining the Stonehenge World Heritage Site would be a grave, irreparable mistake. Why ruin something that has stood for hundreds of generations?
Future generations would be appalled at those who...
Read more
-
I object to the proposed road scheme because:
1. It will cause irreparable damage to a site not just of national but of global significance. It will also impact the important archaeology of the area...
Read more
-
I am staunchly against this proposal as I believe it to be a desecration of our historical landscape.
-
As an individual and a citizen of the British Isles I am shocked and concerned by the proposals around the Stonehenge site. This landmark is a true and irreplaceable representation of our nation's...
Read more
-
I am registering my interest in this application as I personally feel if the plans go ahead as they stand, the impact on the site in terms of the permanent damage to the archaeology that will be...
Read more
-
As someone who has recently completed an extended diploma in wildlife conservation my chief concern regarding the proposed dual carriageway at Stonehenge is the detrimental impact it would have on all...
Read more
-
I first visited Stonehenge in 1958 and have always loved the site, so I am very concerned that the plan regarding the A303 Expressway would cause huge and irreparable damage. Indeed the site might...
Read more
-
This is a UNESCO world heritage site. The whole landscape around it is part of the site - as time goes on more is being discovered about the site and the wider area, how it was accessed and how it was...
Read more
-
I agree with UNESCO that this is a place of special interest and so should be protected for future generations. Personally I feel spiritualy connected to this space and would like to record my...
Read more
-
As someone who frequently uses the A303 to travel between Kent and Devon, I have, over the years, resigned myself to a slow journey on this particular stretch of road. However, I would rather the...
Read more
-
I OBJECT to this DCO Planning Application."
REASONS FOR OBJECTION
Viability / Judicial Review.
The Treasury, National Infrastructure Commission, Office of Road & Rail and National Audit...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
I oppose the current plans surrounding the highways around Stone Henge for the following reasons:
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
•UNESCO's advisers say...
Read more
-
I am concerned with the obvious and possible irreversible damage to archaeology of this unique site.
The loss of view of the site. Stonehenge is an important visual antiquity on the landscape of...
Read more
-
This is our heritage, once destroyed that's it. Please use sense and don't be known as the thing that destroyed the Stonehenge landscape.
-
This is a unique World Heritage Site and should be protected as such. The road is not required and should most definitely not be built. Stonehenge has stood for many hundreds of years and this road,...
Read more
-
I object to the scheme for the following reasons:
It will cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its...
Read more
-
To whom this Representation may concern
I object to the proposed A303 Highway proposal as a citizen of the world and as one of billions of people of our time who are the inheritors of the ancient...
Read more
-
We need a moment of self reflection here, Why is there a need for a damaging highway to be put on this site? Because we have lost ourselves to impatience, anger, instant gratifictation..feeling like...
Read more
-
This scheme will do irreparable damage to a whole landscape that has some of the most iconic prehistoric sites in the world. Many of which we are only now beginning to appreciate and understand.
We...
Read more
-
On behalf of our client, Lincoln College, I wish to register an objection to the Development Consent Order based on the issues outlined below. The College owns land north and south of the A303 to the...
Read more
-
While I fully understand the problems on the A303 past Stonehenge, I do not accept that a diversion round the site cannot be made, with the A303 at that point should only be used by those who are...
Read more
-
It is inappropriate to take a busy road through this unesco world heritage site. It will increase traffic and air pollution, noise and damage to the site! Absolute philistines to even consider this to...
Read more
-
The site is a sacred site and has been known as such for hundreds of years.
Just because you are unaware of the properties of a site or it's connections to the earth and the energy surrounding it...
Read more
-
Stone henge is a NATIONAL treasure, no one 'owns' it, there are simply guardianships of it. You cannot own what you did not create nor purchase. Therefore no road should be allowed to be built in the...
Read more
-
I support the Council for British Archaeology's statement regarding the Stonehenge Tunnel, which they describe as "will cause considerable damage to the surviving archaeological remains within the WHS...
Read more
-
1. It's a World Heritage Site and any works will cause damage to both the site and the wildlife around it.
2. It will no longer be visible from the road for free. It belongs to all of us and...
Read more
-
I am convinced that the planning propsal TRO20025 will cause detrimental effects to the national monument of Stone Henge and the surrounding natural environment; I therefore wish to register my...
Read more
-
I [redacted], WRT Edge vehemently against the building of this tunnel
*It destroys archeological remains of unique historical importance and value
* it is too expensive, while many alternatives have...
Read more