Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I would like to register my issue with the proposed expressway.
The ancient history of this area is not fully understood and I am particularly concerned about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site....
Read more
-
I do not live near the area but I wish it to remain unspoilt for the people as it is one of the oldest sites and want it left unspoilt for the sake of humanity and of all beliefs.
This structure...
Read more
-
I am in favour of a tunnel under the Stonehenge site, its about time we treated this iconic, world renowned site with the respect it deserves. However the current proposals fall woefully short of...
Read more
-
I object to the scheme for the following reasons:
* Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
* UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
The current plan will result in irreparable damage to the Stonehenge and related sites, and UNESCO's advisors have opposed the plan on this basis. There will also be other environmental damage, both...
Read more
-
I am against this development because:
1) The only way to view Stonehenge will be to pay to see it, instead of the henge being a part of the publicly visible landscape.
2) UNESCO does not want...
Read more
-
UNESCO's expert opinion is that this scheme should not go ahead in its present form. I value the opinion of experts.
The scheme would not be reversible and would cause permanent damage to this...
Read more
-
As an American and two time visitor to Stonehenge, I think it is important that you consider opinions from outside the UK. This past September I visited Stonehenge again, the first time being in 2005....
Read more
-
Please, please for all of us do not change any of the Stone Henge area. It would totally ruin the whole History of our Earth. There is still too much work the archeologists need to examine, explore,...
Read more
-
I am concerned that thee seem to be the situation where public concerns, including those far more knowledgeable than me, are not being addressed by the provision of alternatives. This site is in need...
Read more
-
It would be an affront to history and to national pride. Future generations cannot and would not forgive.
-
I object to the proposal on the grounds is unnecessary and damaging to archaeological environment.
-
Please do not pursue this crazy idea!
-
I am a retired architect and for 10 years represented the Council for British Archaeology on Planning matters affecting Listed Buildings in West Lancashire.
My concern with this proposal is that...
Read more
-
Please do not destroy an ancient and priceless landscape for the sake of traffic convenience. I frequently travel along A303 and welcome the pause in my hectic life to view Stonehenge from my car....
Read more
-
The whole site comprises a lot more than just the stones, the landscape dates back thousands of years and it is imperative that it is protected (and possibly enhanced), in its whole!
This is a...
Read more
-
I am one of thousands of members of the public that really resent Highways trying to ignore views and force their plans through. There are very few sites of special significance in England. I...
Read more
-
This unique World Heritage site, should be protected, NOT impacted upon by any development of any kind. The fact it is being considered is extraordinary in itself. It is morally wrong and shows...
Read more
-
I use the A303 regularly to commute to work and return to Cornwall and I want to be sure that Stonehenge is protected during this road scheme work
-
I believe this scheme should not go ahead because it would cause permanent damage to the World Heritage Site. Furthermore, UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form....
Read more
-
I believe that there will be permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
Also UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
There are...
Read more
-
The scheme will do irreparable damage to a World Heritage site, you simply cannot be allowed to do this.
-
Stonehenge is a unique and beautiful place, and there is no justification for intruding upon the site.
The road can be built on another route, Stonehenge cannot be moved.
It is time we valued...
Read more
-
I disagree with Highways England's proposal to drive a massive dual carriageway through the UNESCO site at Stonehenge.
My reasons for objecting are -
1. Permanent damage to the World Heritage...
Read more
-
Dear Sir/ Madame,
I have already done this, anything that threatens National heritage needs to be stopped. You will not have a country of any distinction if this...
Read more
-
Plans to drive a massive dual carriageway into the UNESCO World Heritage Site around Stonehenge will have negative effects on this precious area.
-
I am very concerned about the adverse implications of the proposed development for a unique and important landscape of outstanding archaeological importance.
-
I believe that putting a dual carriageway through the World Heritage Site of Stonehenge will be damaging not only to the environment, destroying the habitat of rare bird species and increasing air...
Read more
-
The proposed development would undoubtedly cause irreparable damage to the Stonehenge World Heritage Site and its surroundings. There are many sites of archaeological interest in this area which may...
Read more
-
I wish to register a protest against the desecration of the ground around Stonehenge. We have no idea what is contained in the ground under and surrounding the Monument. The Drilling machines will,...
Read more
-
I am very concerned about the proposed dual carriageway expressway past Stonehenge. The potential damage to the World Heritage Site and the associated archaeology and landscape is significant and...
Read more
-
Dear Madam/Sir,
I wish to object to this road scheme on the following points.
There will be permanent damage to the world heritage site, archeology and setting.
The world heritage site’s...
Read more
-
I am a regular user of the A303 for business and pleasure and have always enjoyed the unparalleled view of Stonehenge and its landscape setting as I have passed by, on occasion stopping and enjoying...
Read more
-
Open Access to Stonehenge (OAtS) is a Page and a Group on Facebook. Both are public, and the Group currently has more than 3,500 members, not just from the UK
As time is short, I shall submit the...
Read more
-
the project should not destroy land in one the most important areas in the world
the overwhelming scientific opinion is the tunnel would cause repairable damage to the stonehenge area
other...
Read more
-
Irreparable damage to the WHS, its archaeology and setting, described by UNESCO as a ‘landscape without parallel’
-
I strongly object to this DCO planning application, the tunnel will cause untold damage to archaeology in this area which has been inhabited since the Mesolithic Period, Wildlife in the area which...
Read more
-
Please can I strongly object to the proposed Stonehenge A303 Stonehenge tunnel etc for the following reasons:
It will seriously damage Blick Mead (BM). The current excavations are smaller than the...
Read more
-
The proposed scheme has already damaged the important Mesolithic site at Blick Mead and will undoubtedly cause further damage. It will impede progress on the reintroduction of the Great Bustard to the...
Read more
-
My Representation will be based on the benefits this scheme will have for local communities and the threats to those communities if the plans are not delivered.
It will detail the damage that is...
Read more
-
1. Objection to potential damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic site. The site is still poorly understood. The development will destry the very delicate archaeology there.
2. I object to the lack of...
Read more
-
I would like it known that I strongly protest against this proposal of a road going through or under the site which is a sacred area of Stonehenge I believe this would cause among other things severe...
Read more
-
I believe it is totally inappropriate to build as planned as loss of habitat is for many species irreplaceable, already we are seeing flora and fauna decreasing and the British countryside is rapidly...
Read more
-
The Peak District Green Lanes Alliance is a co-ordinating body for groups and individuals concerned about the problems posed by using off-road vehicles on unsealed and unsurfaced tracks in the...
Read more
-
There should be no development close enough to the site that causes visual or audible damage to the experience of visiting the site
-
totally unnecessary , appalling waste of public money , badly thought out , no alternatives offered or even it would appear considered . The damage to this most important world heritage would be...
Read more
-
I would like to object to the construction of the tunnel past Stonehenge as I feel this will cause damage to the ancient landscape. I would request that the government consider a bypass well away from...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the proposed tunnel on the A303 at Stonehenge on the grounds that it will destroy archeological remains
Philip Matthews
[Redacted]
-
I feel very strongly that then proposed tunnel should not go ahead due to the unique importance of the site, both archaeological and natural.
-
UNESCO have provided funds to help preserve this site and a lot of its heritage. Much of that heritage is still uncovered. Unless we are prepared to pay those monies back we shouldn’t take UNESCO’s...
Read more