Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
Because of the irreparable damage to the important archeological remains at Blick Mead.
The objection of so many distinguished and thoughtful people knowledgable in the field has entirely changed...
Read more
-
Iam greatly disturbed by the plans for a tunnel under what is a sacred monument. The loss of the iconic and free view is unacceptable,as is the damage to the nature and countryside with what is a...
Read more
-
I submit that not enough attention is being given to the opinions of international bodies that have an interest in preserving the character of this historic site.
-
I wish to register as an Interested Party with respect to the proposed changes to the A303 in the vicinity of Stonehenge. I am a British Citizen and resident of the South West, wishing to represent my...
Read more
-
The sight of Stonehenge as it comes into view from the east is unforgettable at all times.
With the sun setting overhead it is truly magical.
This monument was given to the nation by Sir Cecil...
Read more
-
I would dislike seeing Stonehenge encroached upon.
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
• Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
• UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
• Concerns about damage to Blick Mead...
Read more
-
I am opposed to the building of a tunnel for several basic reasons.
1. The huge cost at a time when the country simply cannot afford it.
2. The simple building of another lane on the A303 would...
Read more
-
The proposed short tunnel will compromise the area around Stonehenge. The tunnel portals are much too close to the stones so their environment will be noisy rather than tranquil. The scheme fails to...
Read more
-
Damage has already been done by driving a bore hole through a Mesolithic platform. If this happens even before work gets under way, what damage can we expect when contractors with heavy plant are on...
Read more
-
I object to the current proposal for several reasons. Firstly there will be permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go...
Read more
-
Under section 35 of the Postal Services Act 2011 (the “Act”), Royal Mail has been designated by Ofcom as a provider of the Universal Postal Service. Royal Mail is the only such provider in the United...
Read more
-
I believe from the evidence I have seen that the plans will have a detrimental affect on Stonehenge. This listed site needs to be protected. Not enough has been done to look at alternatives. I...
Read more
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
I have so many concerns about this....but in brief
-Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
-UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
I believe construction regarding the road widening of the A303, Stonehenge will be irrevocably damaging to this ancient site, which should be considered as a whole, even extending to its horizons and...
Read more
-
I am extremely concerned that this Stonehenge should be preserved in its entirety. I visit the stones often and my time there is extremely precious. I also drive past the site and the current view...
Read more
-
1) I believe that the proposed work will cause permanent damage to this World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting, making impossible much overdue work to explore it in greater depth than ever...
Read more
-
This World Hertitage site should be preserved for future generations, intact, unspoiled undamaged.
-
Permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present form.
Concerns about damage to Blick Mead Mesolithic...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is a unique and treasured National Monument
of great scientific and other valueror some it still has religious significance
and we have a duty as a nation to guaranteee protection of all...
Read more
-
I believe the current application will damage the World heritage Site, both its archaeology and its setting. UNESCO has said that it should not go ahead in its present form.
The traffic flow will be...
Read more
-
My representation is my concern for Stonehenge as a World Heritage Site, any planning application should not jeopardise this status. Stonehenge is an ancient monument which is visited by thousands of...
Read more
-
I have monitored this proposal since it was first suggested, and from my point of view as an amateur archaeologist (but with some hands on professional experience), I am firmly opposed to this plan...
Read more
-
I am writing to express serious objection to the plans to build a dual carriageway through the UNESCO World Heritage Site around Stonehenge. The area is one of unique archaeological and ritual...
Read more
-
This scheme is completely flawed. If it goes ahead it will jeopardise the World Heritage Site (WHS) designation of Stonehenge WHS. It also has a number of negative environmental impacts, and my...
Read more
-
We have previously responded to Highways England's consultations on the proposals for improving the A303 past Stonehenge. Several of our concerns about the impact of the scheme on the archaeological...
Read more
-
I am very against your proposal for many reasons Further pollution in an area which is of outstanding historical heritage and interest! Interfering with lay lines surrounding the henge and...
Read more
-
Unbelievable that such an ancient site of importance to our ancestors thousands of years ago and linking our history through to who we are today, the people of Britain, that we can put the land and...
Read more
-
I object due to the following reasons,
permanent damage to the World Heritage Site, its archaeology and setting.
UNESCO's advisers say the scheme should not go ahead in its present...
Read more
-
Improve the route to the M5 as a large amount of traffic is going north via the A358 this will reduce the majority of the haulage traffic from the south coast ports.
-
I am very concerned that the planning proposal will restrict public access and enjoyment of this important UNESCO heritage site. Also concerns me greatly that the roadworks could damage millennia-old...
Read more
-
I'm against the road is it will destroy our most ancient and historic world heritage site. I feel the proposed road is a deliberate act to try and remove the last pieces of our indigenous heritage and...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is irreplaceable. The proposal will definitely adversely affect the World Heritage site, it’s archaeology, landscape and it’s setting in perpetuity. UNESCO has stated its objections to the...
Read more
-
I believe that Stonehenge and the surrounding areas, the whole world heritage site is totally unique and very special. It should be cherished and treated with the utmost caution and respect. Not just...
Read more
-
I wish to support the Stone Aliances objections to this application.
-
I amvery concerned about the destruction of a most important archaelogical site. I understand that UNESCO are against the proposed plan too.
Also I am very against the loss of the view from the road,...
Read more
-
As a local resident who also works as a tour guide at Stonehenge, I am concerned of the implications on local residents of the proposed Stonehenge Tunnel and I also worry about the disturbance of the...
Read more
-
It will ruin Stonehenge and change the sight u see from the road plus’s the damage that could happen to stonehenge
-
The environment, wildlife and heritage are all important to my life. I believe these plans will damage all of these. Endangered wildlife in the area will be even more at risk. The World Heritage...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is an historical, archaeological, and spiritual site of international renown and importance. Major excavation in the proposed proximity to the site will risk damage to the site in ways that...
Read more
-
I wish to object to the proposed A303 'expressway' in the vicinity of Stonehenge, primarily on the grounds of:
- Damage to the Stonehenge UNESCO World Heritage Site, its archaeology and surrounding...
Read more
-
As an action group opposed to the proposed Lower Thames Crossing we have learn about many other destructive Highways England schemes including this one. We have serious concerns over the way that HE...
Read more
-
The Avebury Society, founded as a civic society in 1994, with interests in the Avebury part of the World Heritage Site (WHS), now has c.60 members. A series of inappropriate Avebury planning proposals...
Read more
-
Introduction
Historic England is the government’s statutory adviser on all matters relating to the historic environment, including world heritage. It is our duty under the provisions of the...
Read more
-
The Stonehenge Alliance is a group of five national NGOs: Ancient Sacred Landscape Network, Campaign for Better Transport, Campaign to Protect Rural England, Friends of the Earth and Rescue: The...
Read more
-
Stonehenge is unique - as we all know, and its designation as a World Heritage Site shows that the utmost care needs to be taken with this site, it is vital that proper consultation takes place...
Read more
-
The proposed works at Stonehenge are dangerous to the archaeological integrity of the world heritage site.
As a historian, I feel I have the duty to stand up for this piece of English...
Read more