Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I am concerned about the damage these plans would cause to the World Heritage Site.
There will be loss of unexplored archaeology and heritage.
We need to stop these plans and preserve all the site...
Read more
-
I don't believe that the road scheme currently proposed should go ahead as it is too damaging.
-
My primary observations are about the potential damage the project would cause and the need to care for the Stonehenge heritage site.
-
This world heritage site will be irreparably damaged by the propsed development. We would be sacrificing one of the most historic sites in the world for a short-term transport benefit.
-
I feel that the new road would ruin the asthetics of the surrounding area and could cause irreparable damage to the ancient site. I am sure there is an alternative to this proposal. I live in...
Read more
-
I am against the building of this tunnel because the ancient sites in that area must not be disturbed above or below ground anywhere in the vicinity.
-
I strongly object to the distruction of such an important world heritage site.What wil the
people in future years think of the distruction of their inheritance?? They will never forgive us.
-
I am totally against the Stonehenge tunnel. I'm against any length tunnel and despair at the lack of alternative proposals. Stonehenge is known throughout the world and is one of the most important...
Read more
-
1. Disturbing ancient burial mounds
2. Disrupting energy Ley lines
3. A blot on the landscape
4. Traffic will bottle-neck further down the A303 and cause congestion in all the villages
-
I am objecting first on the basis of UNESCO's advisers comments. I don't understand how these can be ignored.
In such a sensitive, historic and valuable landscape, road-widening is a retrograde...
Read more
-
Please preserve this national treasure for the wide world
UNESCO’s international advisers advise that the scheme should not go ahead as it is.
Could there be more consultation, including...
Read more
-
any representation made will be with regard to the statement of common ground to be drawn up between the RSPB and Highways England
-
I fear that the Expressway will be another botched attempt by an inept planning department. Thirty years ago the A303 was a superb road to reach the southwest from London. It is now useless. The...
Read more
-
Ancient heritage sites should be protected not undermined. The work near to this site is irresponsible in the threat to the safety of the site. I object to it.
-
As a nation we should be moving completely away from our love affair with cars and roads, our planet can't afford any more. We're leading the way with wind farms, why can't we sort out out transport?
-
I would like to say that whilst I can see the present road A303 is consistently congested, I feel it is really unrespectful on a deep and ancient level to tunnel underneath the stones at Stonehenge....
Read more
-
I am deeply opposed to the proposed highway development works around Stonehenge. Stonehenge is an internationally significant world heritage site and the proposed road works put short term interests...
Read more
-
I'm against the development as I believe the loss of view from the road will be a huge negative towards stonehenge & its history. I also believe there will be damage to artifacts and wildlife.
-
I’m objecting to the proposals on the following grounds:
- Damage to the landscape and archaeology
- Damage to the wildlife and habitats
- Disturbance to the reasonable tranquility that...
Read more
-
Concern about the effects on a WORLD HERITAGE site.
Concern that in a time of climate emergency we continue to increase roads to make routes more effective.
A desire that monies be invested in...
Read more
-
I am deeply concerned that this application with have catastrophic implications in terms of destruction to long-established habitats of both animal and bird and also plants and ancient landscape. I am...
Read more
-
I object to this scheme as I consider that the risk of damage to a unique world heritage site (including any deep archaeology) is too great and certainly outweighs any gain in improved traffic...
Read more
-
in its current form i object to the shear lack of consideration to the location and the lasting damage it will cause. Stonehenge must be preserved and left alone when at all possible, including what...
Read more
-
The current proposals will damage the world heritage site that is not only the Stonehenge itself but a large area around it as well. This will mean the loss of features and artifacts which are of...
Read more
-
It is a mystery to me that anyone could consider this project.
It is clear that this plan will be damaging to a very significant World Heritage site.
It is a short term solution to a short term...
Read more