Filter

Lower Thames Crossing

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 1148 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Jamie Russell

    I am concerned that the proposed scheme will increase carbon emissions by around 6.6m tonnes. This is at odds with the warnings from scientists and the UN IPCC about the need for nations to cut... Read more

  • Janet Winch

    As I live very close to the proposed road. I would like to be kept in the loop as to whats going on and to be able to make any points if they need to be raised

  • John Booth

    I hope to address: 1/. Impact on wildlife - including loss of habitat and effectiveness of proposed mitigation measures. 2/. Impact on climate change - including compatibility with national and... Read more

  • John David Fish

    A further crossing between Dartford and Southend is desperately needed to relieve cogestion at the Dartford crossings.

  • John England

    Why destroy large portions of South Essex and North Kent, when the relief is required 10 miles away. Its a simple fix that if it had been your preferred option would probably be well under... Read more

  • John Gostling

    As your a civil servant could you explain why the road did not come up in a 25 year search , we have lived here for over 15 years and nothing come up in the search from the solicitors. This major road... Read more

  • John Harold Anthony Taylor MIVR MILT

    Is in support of the crossing with regard to the local and national road infastructure. My representation would be to monitor the means to aid and increase the flow of HGV traffic into and across this... Read more

  • John Johnson

    My principal submission, while supporting much of the proposals, is that the planning process to date has not taken sufficient account of the impact on local roads south of the Thames. In particular,... Read more

  • John McCann

    I will comment on any changes to the areas around Chalk.

  • John White

    I want to understand fully the road layout in Hornsby Lane

  • Jon Ruben

    I travel to Broadstairs from Nottingham twice a month and realise that we need this Lower Thames Crossing now, not in 100 years when I'm dead. Get your skates on and stop messing around with enquiries... Read more

  • Julian Howes

    The main points that I intend to raise are on the following: The traffic impact of the proposal on local roads and junctions on the highway network. The lack of proper links such that traffic from all... Read more

  • Julian Quinton

    I wish to make a representation regarding motorcycles using the tunnel and having the same access rights as they have at the present Dartford crossing. i.e. learners can use the tunnel as can... Read more

  • Keith Banks

    1. That every effort will be made to recruit workers locally 2. That if there is a toll levied all residents within a 10 mile radius will be given a preferential pass. 3. Every care will be taken to... Read more

  • Ken Bowman

    The decision to proceed with the current Lower Thames crossing was made without adequate consideration of the alternative which was designated as scheme A14 in the original evaluations. Scheme A14 is... Read more

  • Kevin Johncock

    To ensure that the natural environment of Shorne Ifield Road (the road adjascent to Thong Lane), Randall and Shorne Woods and their environs, are protected from damage, destruction or degregation,... Read more

  • Kimberley Dennis

    I support the new crossing

  • Laura Hicks

    As a resident of (REDACTED). We do not want this new road or the impact it will have on the area. It will cause high level or noise and even more pollution in a highly polluted area already. It will... Read more

  • Linda Allen

    My representation will be from the point of view of ecological damage and inappropriateness of the project given the government's climate commitments.

  • Linda Hall

    Living in southeast Kent and having to use the M25 and all the difficults it has with assidents & too much traffic it'll be great to go north without the M25 & it'll be easier to get to Norwich and... Read more

  • Lisa Scott

    In order to meet legally binding climate change targets, private car use in the UK must be reduced by 25%, there is therefore no need for an additional crossing. The funding needs to be directed... Read more

  • Manjit Atwal

    The Area urgently needs this so get on with it.

  • Marc Harding

    I think that the new river crossing should go ahead. Just having the Blackwall and Dartford tunnels isn't enough - and the Rotherhithe tunnel is just a Victorian throwback.

  • Maria Guest-Naharnowicz

    As a holiday home owner in Allhallows , near Rochester - this will affect traffic flow from Essex to Kent and congestion will build up around get entrance in burg sides of the estuary. The damage to... Read more

  • Marie Frost

    I believe this plan is the way forward in developing not only this country's infrastructure but also to maintain better links to Europe