Filter
M3 Junction 9 Improvement

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1 to 50 of 106 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • Cycle Winchester (Cycle Winchester)

    Cycle Winchester is a community campaign group based in Winchester. The aim of Cycle Winchester is to make Winchester better by bike, i.e. to create a better Winchester (the city and surrounding... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES LTD (NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC SERVICES LTD)

    Dear Sirs, NATS anticipates no impact from the M3J9 proposal and has no comments to make. We acknowledge receipt of the submission of a DCO from National Highways as per their correspondence dated... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 1 February 2023

  • Graham Wren

    I use the M3 junction 9 daily often multiple times daily for work and pleasure. I hope to see improvement in traffic flow and a much safer road layout.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Ian James Douglass

    I support the proposals for the M3 J9 Improvement Scheme.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 February 2023

  • Winchester Friends of the Earth (Winchester Friends of the Earth)

    We have made multiple representations in relation to this scheme (letters of 18-2-18, 25-8-19, 6-7-21). Nothing has altered except the growing insanity of this scheme. National Highways continues to... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 3 February 2023

  • Kirsteen Ruffell

    I cannot conceive how this tallies locally, nationally or on a world view with the climate emergency we are already in, I do not agree with any money being spent on this project tgat will increase... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 February 2023

  • Simon Mole

    The proposed diversion are wholly unsuitable and impractical. They will adversely affect the Winchester inner ring road and residential areas such as Headbourne Worthy and Kings Worthy. There have... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 15 February 2023

  • Mitchell Bridges Ltd (Mitchell Bridges Ltd)

    Although the scheme will no doubt secure benefits in the long term, the short term disruption to Junction 9 will have an impact on our business and its employees, with any major project initiative I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 17 February 2023

  • Chris Hobson

    Flow improvements needed to and from A34 and in merge with M3

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 February 2023

  • Kate Needham

    The impact on the Climate Emergency The impact on biodiversity The impact of increased air pollution The impact of more industrialisation of the area. The high cost of changing this one junction... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 February 2023

  • Robert Michael Jordan

    Just here to commend NH on including a new cycleway from Cart & Horses, Kingsworthy to Winnall, and bridleway from Easton Lane to Long Walk.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 February 2023

  • Susan Jayne Cook

    I have lived in the Village of [] for some 28 years and the M3 has been a very big part of my daily commute. The proposed works will have a catastrophic effect on the Villages that surround these... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 February 2023

  • James Brett

    In my opinion the money could be better spent sequestering carbon by rewilding national parks/ increase nature reserves. This would also have the added benefit of the desperately needed increase in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Jemma Giles

    I live on thw [] that is literally on junction 9 of the M3. So we are very effected by any works on the junction. Very interested in the earthworks and tree screening that will be between us and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Winchester Action on the Climate Crisis (Winchester Action on the Climate Crisis)

    It would be reckless to proceed with this project until it is clear it will not undermine the government targets to reduce emissions to net zero by 2050, and until alternative less harmful ways of... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 22 February 2023

  • Charlotte Coleman

    I’m very worried about the proximity of the new road and pathways related to it, to our property. I’m very concerned that the landscape is done properly, with lots of mature trees and the roads being... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 February 2023

  • Geoffrey Michael Fairris

    I have access rights along Long Walk/Fulling Mill Lane

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 25 February 2023

  • Robert Parker

    The expansion of the current highway system encourages traffic growth, increases carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere, further suppresses wild life, pollutes our water ways and depletes our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 26 February 2023

  • Charlotte Bailey

    Carbon emissions from construction Pollution from diverted traffic during construction This will encourage more traffic when we need to reduce

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Christine Holloway

    I oppose everything that will lead to an increase in traffic because of the harm caused by motor vehicles to the climate, physical health, mental health, children, sense of community, and wildlife.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Kings Worthy and Abbots Worthy Parish Council (Kings Worthy and Abbots Worthy Parish Council)

    Our parish sits at the edge of the proposed works and we are broadly in favour of the improvements but obviously have the safety and interests of our parishioners at the front of our views. We welcome... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Philippa May Wood

    I WOULD LIKE TO REGISTER MY OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ON THE BASIS THAT IT IS HUGELY DAMAGING TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND RUNS COUNTER TO THE UK'S COMMITMENT TO CLIMATE EMERGENCY MEASURES

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Susan Bacchus

    This project is a total waste pf public money, leading to an increase on traffic, fossil fuel pollution and global warming. The government should be encouraging reduction in traffic, not the increase.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 March 2023

  • Claire Jones

    I am concerned that this project is seeking to increase road capacity, and hence greenhouse gas emissions, at a time when we urgently need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transport.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 March 2023

  • Extinction Rebellion Winchester (Extinction Rebellion Winchester)

    For too long we have been told that building roads solves problems but the reality is it just creates them. There is a plethora of evidence that expanding road capacity creates Induced Demand,... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 3 March 2023

  • Grace Brennan

    I object to the proposal on the grounds of further destruction of wildlife habitat, higher pollution levels and higher co2 emmissons

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 March 2023

  • James Miller

    This is completely incompatible with preventing the climate crisis.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 March 2023

  • Jennifer Muriel Stables

    Reducing carbon dioxide emissions is the most important priority for humanity now. We are already heading for catastrophic effects from climate change and warming well above 1.5 degrees celsius.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 March 2023

  • Roberta Brockman

    This project is a shameless capacity increase in order to encourage growth of traffic at a time when the government should be planning for traffic reduction. National Highways predicts a carbon cost... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 March 2023

  • Ahmad Tauqir

    A new junction will encourage further growth in car traffic at a time when there should be greater investment in public transport and infrastructure.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 March 2023

  • Duncan Melling

    I object to this proposal on environmental grounds

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 March 2023

  • Esther Dovey

    It has been proved repeatedly that if you expand roads, you get more traffic. Instead, what's required is better public transport, better walking & cycling facilities, and car sharing schemes, for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 March 2023

  • Hazel Agombar

    This scheme will attract even more vehicles to the area. It will increase carbon emissions and worsen air quality. We should be moving away from road expansion - we face a climate crisis. I am opposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 March 2023

  • Helen Gabriel

    I do not support this development

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 March 2023

  • Laura Blake

    I am opposed t this project. I have concerns as the scheme increases traffic and carbon emissions, and impacts on the South Downs National Park.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 5 March 2023

  • Giles Gooding

    I object to the M3J9 upgrade because it will increase emissions due to construction and increased traffic at a time when we legally obliged to reduce emissions.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 March 2023

  • Ramblers Association - Winchester Group (Ramblers Association - Winchester Group)

    Ramblers Association Registration Comments related to DCO for M3 junction 9 Improvement - DRAFT 1. The Ramblers Association (Winchester Group) has been fully engaged with the Walkers, Cyclists and... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 6 March 2023

  • John Moore

    Great concern that this will drive even more traffic down the A34 and create more noise and air pollution.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 March 2023

  • Roger lunn

    I am concerned about the visual impact of the historic city of Winchester from the surrounding countryside and increase in noise levels and pollution.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 7 March 2023

  • Action on Carbon in Twyford (Action on Carbon in Twyford )

    1. We have concerns about the increased traffic pollution this will bring locally - particulate and noise. 2. We have concerns about the increased traffic pollution that will spill over into our... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • British Horse Society (British Horse Society)

    Impacts on local rights of way and provision / mitigation for walkers, cyclists and horse riders who use them’

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Ilina Todorovska

    I have particular concerns around the cumulative impacts between this project and the increased capacity of the M3 and transformation into a Smart Motorway. I do not believe the assessment that there... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Lewis Troke

    I wish to Register my objection to this project is the lack of alternative proposals such as Rail Infrastructure (both Passenger and Freight). The money would perhaps be better spent on automating... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Louise Conroy

    Need to understand impact of M3 J9 improvement on A33 past my house. Am I going to construction traffic am I going to have increased traffic past my house during construction or on opening What are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Lucinda Graham

    Strongly opposed to £200 million improvements plans

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Mark Paul Reach

    The significant carbon impacts are concerning.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Michel Anthony Slinn

    I think the current proposals are huge improvement on the first set of proposals. I would like to check on the final details when they are published and reserve further comment until then.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Polly Perry

    It seems a lot do money to spend at a time when there’s a cost of living crisis and reduced funding for many much needed other things. The impact on the environment in increasing road use rather than... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP (Addleshaw Goddard LLP) on behalf of Southern Gas Networks Plc (Southern Gas Networks Plc)

    Dear Sirs Highways England (Promoter) Application for an Order Granting Development Consent for the M3 Junction 9 Improvement project (Order). Planning Inspectorate Reference: TR010055 Objection on... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 8 March 2023

  • Daniel Chapman

    Timing and and road closures during construction

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 March 2023