Filter
A66 Northern Trans-Pennine Project

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 200 of 231 representations, newest first.

Results per page View 25 results per page | 50 | View 100 results per page

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mr M Carruthers (Mr M Carruthers)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mr P Tavener (Mr P Tavener)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mr P White (Mr P White)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mr S Heron (Mr S Heron)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mr S W Harrison (Mr S W Harrison)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mr T Foster (Mr T Foster)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Edwin Thompson LLP (Edwin Thompson LLP ) on behalf of Mr Wilson (Mr Wilson )

    DCO A66 Trans-Pennine September 2022 Objection – Mr. Wilson Further to our previous letter of objections to the November and February consultation. Please find below further objections following the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mrs C Heron (Mrs C Heron)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mrs D Heron (Mrs D Heron)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mrs M Heron (Mrs M Heron)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Mrs M Heron (Mrs M Heron)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • National Grid Gas Plc (National Grid Gas Plc)

    Please see attached.

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • NFU North West (NFU North West)

    In am writing on behalf of the NFU in the North West of England and would like to use this opportunity to highlight the main issues that have been raised by our members who have been impacted by the... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • North Yorkshire County Council & Richmondshire District Council (North Yorkshire County Council & Richmondshire District Council)

    Relevant Representation of North Yorkshire County Council and Richmondshire District Council The following representation is made on behalf of North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC) and Richmondshire... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Weightmans LLP (Weightmans LLP ) on behalf of Northern Powergrid Yorkshire PLC (Northern Powergrid Yorkshire PLC)

    The following representations are submitted on behalf of Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) PLC as an electricity undertaker for the area within which the A66 Northern Trans Pennine Project project is... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • Town Centre Regeneration Ltd (Town Centre Regeneration Ltd) on behalf of Penrith Properties Ltd. c/o Finsbury Trust and Corp. Services (Penrith Properties Ltd. c/o Finsbury Trust and Corp. Services)

    Penrith Properties Limited (PPL) are the freeholder of land to the north east of junction 40 of the M6 at its junction with the A66 (CU138344), identified as plot 0102-01-20. The relevant papers were... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Stead Family ( Stead Family)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Taylor Family ( Taylor Family)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of The Kenneth Thompson Discretionary Will Trust (The Kenneth Thompson Discretionary Will Trust)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Morbaine Limited (Morbaine Limited) on behalf of Trustees of Morbaine Ltd Directors Pension Scheme (Trustees of Morbaine Ltd Directors Pension Scheme)

    My client has no objection to the scheme in principle, but they are concerned with a small element of the proposed ‘Environmental Mitigation’ which will impact on their current landholding and, more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • United Utilities (United Utilities)

    United Utilities wishes to submit the following to summarise the position to date as we confirm our registration as an interested party for the A66 Northern Trans Pennine Project. The representation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022

  • George F White (George F White) on behalf of Watson Family (Watson Family)

    On behalf of my Clients, I intend to raise through written representations and replies, and if appropriate oral representations at a Hearing and Compulsory Acquisition Hearing concerns relating to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 2 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Cllr Graham Simpkins

    1) Unnecessary impact on individuals, properties, communities, and the local agricultural and tourism businesses through unnecessary and uneconomic land use. The impact on individuals and agricultural... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • David Sparrow

    This relates to the proposals about the Greta Bridge junction and the diversion through Startforth. As you can see I live in Startforth and often use the route that will be affected. An organisation... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Diane Thomas

    I am particularly concerned about the effect this proposed route will have on Dyke Nook Farm. The planned route will in my opinion, greatly compromise the farm, by taking a section of it's land and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Dr Piers Taylor

    I am an architect and an expert in terms of landscape impact. In my professional opinion, this proposal will be highly detrimental to the nature and character of this unspoiled part of the Eden Valley... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Francis Nicholson

    I object to the A66 Project. I own a property in Kirkby Thore. Due to the siting of the junction at the north of the village, Kirkby Thore will become a rat run for traffic seeking to divert to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Guy Johnson

    I'm writing to object to this project, which will commit £2 billion pounds of public money to the building of roads which will cause great harm to important wildlife habitats, and which will cause a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Judith Heelis

    As a smallholder living and working near the proposed route I am saddened and Surprised that no one. has arranged to visit this location. The meetings in the Village Hall have been useful however from... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Kirkby Thore Parish Council (Kirkby Thore Parish Council)

    Kirkby Thore Parish Council [KTPC] made detailed submissions about potential impacts of the road design during both A66 consultations. Some were acknowledged, but others have been dismissed, and... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Lauren Ferson

    I object to the A66 dualling project principally due to the level of Carbon generated. This road is the 3rd highest carbon producer of all road projects. NH cannot suggest the justification for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Lorna Baker

    My interest in the A66 is mainly about the length going past Kirkby Thore. I have two concerns: 1- The chosen route round Kirkby Thore is acknowledged to require a large amount of mitigation of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Lynn Tumilty

    I object to the A66 project. I specifically object to the Temple Sowerby to Crackenthorpe Section. Air pollution is an increasing concerns as respiratory conditions increase. We are just exiting a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Mary Clare H Martin

    Concerns and objections:1) Impact on individuals, properties and communities 2) Impact on landscape and environment, air quality, increased noise and light pollution, carbon emissions. 3) Failure to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Benjamin (Benjamin) on behalf of Mrs Joy Thompson (Mrs Joy Thompson)

    The enlarged A66 should be built to the NORTH of the present road in the area opposite the lane to Great Musgrave. There is plenty of land available there for a large dual carriageway, and the road... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Natural England (Natural England)

    Natural England welcomes the opportunity to make Relevant Representations for the A66 NTP Dualling Project. Attached to this email are Natural England’s Relevant Representations, the Statement of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Paul Crooks

    I object to the Temple Sowerby- Appleby section for a number of reasons as follow This section of the road travels through the Eden river SAC/SSI and is within the setting of the North Pennines AONB.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Benjamin (Benjamin) on behalf of Prof Lucien Taylor (Prof Lucien Taylor)

    The road in the section between Appleby and Brough, and especially around Flitholme and the Great Musgrave turning, section should ALL be built to the north of the current road. Here, the land to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Rachel Pinniger

    Registering as an individual to be greatly affected by the upgraded road. Concerns and objections:1) Impact on individuals, properties and communities 2) Impact on landscape and environment, air... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Benjamin (Benjamin) on behalf of Right Reverend Hewlett Thompson (Right Reverend Hewlett Thompson)

    A66 Transpennine project, Warcop to Brough section, TR010062 1 I support points made by others making representations as interested parties from the Warcop to Brough section, that the road should go... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Sam Martin

    My grandparents live at (REDACTED) where the Langrigg road meets the A66. I am appalled by the way in which the consultation process has been managed. It has been both confusing and distressing for my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Susan Hipkiss

    Huge increase of carbon emissions both in the construction of said road and in usage - resulting in increase in Global warming. Destruction of protected landscapes and habitats.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • William Ferson

    I object to the A66 being granted a DCO . NH have stated growing tourism, specifically the Lake District Park as one of the main justifications for dualling 9 sections. NH have failed to consult with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 September 2022

  • Alice Ferson

    I object to the A66 proposal. This project is to benefit HGV traffic. Given the Government objective of shifting freight to rail as outlined in the National Infastructure Report - Better Delivery- the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Ian Ritchie Land Agents Ltd (Ian Ritchie Land Agents Ltd) on behalf of Atkinson Family ( Atkinson Family)

    Our clients have been issued with land take plans but no details on whether this is temporary or permanent have been given. The area of land being taken includes the only access to their property from... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Barnard Castle Town Council (Barnard Castle Town Council) on behalf of Barnard Castle Town Council (Barnard Castle Town Council)

    We believe that the Black route conflicts with the National Planning Policy Framework Revised 2021 [NPPF] under sections 6 (strong, competitive economy), 7 (the vitality of town centres), 8 (promoting... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Cathy Harrison

    I am a local resident and use the A66 Monday to Friday as I work in Appleby. I object to the A66 proposal for a number of reasons. 1. The proposed route at Kirkby Thore is longer than the existing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Charles McQueen

    As a conservation professional and having carried out bird surveys in the vicinity of Kirkby Thore over the last 20 years I strongly object to the proposed northern bypass of Kirkby Thore associated... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • County Cllr Richard Bell

    Summary County Cllr Richard Bell, Member for the Barnard Castle West Division (ie. A local member) and Deputy Leader of Durham County Council, wishes to register his opinion that the proposed Black... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022

  • Dehenna Davison MP

    As the local Member of Parliament, I write to outline my view of the proposed A66 improvement project. Overall, I welcome the project, which will create much needed improvements to this vital route.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 September 2022