Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 3626 to 3650 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Lynwen Plowman

    Grave concerns about the pollution and impact on people’s health and our environment if this goes ahead. The m25 and a bigger Gatwick will be devastating

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Megan Cunnington

    I am against expansion in terms of the below points. Increased noise Increased impact on the environment Infrastructure not in place even in new plans Levels of unemployment are low in this area so... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Michael Harrison

    This new runway will destroy so many fine buildings and a historic village, then there is the increase in pollution, why is this application being considered when as a Country we are looking for Zero... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Michaela Maloney

    Having grown up and lived in the Gatwick catchment area and been inspired to work in aeronautical engineering and infrastructure and working around the world before setting up my own business locally,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Nick Blofeld

    Expansion will mean: 35% more flights than 2019 48% more emissions than 2019 5.5% of all UK emissions will come from Gatwick in 2038 Being the size of Heathrow (where are they going to put 80m... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Paul Radford

    Living on a ten mile final approach path to Gatwick, we already suffer with constant noise. An increase in movements would have a negative impact on our quality of life at home, increased pollution... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Rebecca Blum

    I object to the scheme, as it will increase carbon emissions, when we should we be doing all we can to rapidly decrease our emissions. I also object to the increased noise pollution caused by the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Rebecca Harris

    As a resident near Gatwick I’m very concerned 1 for the noise and 2 fire all the wild life that will be lost one of the reasons we moved to the area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Robert Sayer

    At this stage I will be brief. The proposed extension will inevitably damage the local environment and quality of life of residents. Increased aircraft noise over a wider area including those that do... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Robert Stephens

    I would like express my concern about both existing and additional (if this proposal is granted) air traffic noise in particular departures over my property, it is already above SOAEL, I cannot watch... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Ruth Wilson

    I do not support the proposed new runway and additional flights that it will generate - there will be added noise & air pollution generated by the planes, fuel pollution from people driving to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Sally Lemsford

    With the world facing a huge Climate Crisis, we should be reducing air travel, not expanding it. We shouldn’t be encouraging leisure travel and we need to transport goods locally or by sea to reduce... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Sare Bassett

    We object to the proposed expansion plans for the following reasons; 1) Noise – this it will lead to a significant increase in air traffic leading to noise and pollution impacting our community in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Simon Bean

    The pollution and noise from dramatically increasing the number of flights from Gatwick is totally unacceptable and this project needs to be stopped. I live directly under the Gatwick flight path and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Simon Petts

    I have worked at Gatwick for 29 years, I see the importance of the airports future growth has on the families of our staff & the local communities. Gatwick is in competition with European airports who... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Sophie Curra

    Living under the Gatwick flight path is already unpleasant enough. Having any extra planes will be intolerable.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Sussex Green Living (Sussex Green Living)

    We HAVE TO KEEP FOSSIL FUEL IN THE GROUND. So unless these aircraft, airport buildings and airport vehicles are being powered by with clean energy or running on air or CO2, we can not expand Gatwick... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • The Arora Group (The Arora Group)

    There have been ongoing discussions regarding the temporary and permanent acquisition of The Arora Group landholdings. Whilst dialogue is ongoing, we wish to register our interest as matters regarding... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Robert Atwood on behalf of The Atwoods (The Atwoods)

    I am extremely concerned at the impact on my area from a second runway, particularly landing aircraft on their crosswind or final approaches turning over our area at altitudes of around 4000ft. Even... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Redmond John Lee (Redmond John Lee) on behalf of The Lee Family (The Lee Family)

    In our view it will: 1. Significantly raise the sound pollution, particularly over Lingfield. 2. It will increase air pollution over Lingfield due to the increase in air traffic. 3. It will increase... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Tim Hardwicke

    Expansion of the airport and runway capacity is vital for business in the area plus the UK as a whole and something that i support.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Virginia Baldock

    I have 2 main objections. My 1st objection is the impact a second runway will have on global warming. We should be flying more not less. I know several people who have flown abroad this year for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Wayne Pritchard

    Gatwick north needs a bigger runway due to.the amount of travel

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Zac White

    I absolutely support the expansion, means a lot of jobs offered and less disruption for the airport

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 October 2023

  • Adrian Geaves

    I support this application as this represents a cost effective way to upgrade existing assets with significant benefits to the local economy, subject to sensitive handling of any environmental issues... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 October 2023