Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
As a local resident and a worker at the airport, I am looking forward to Gatwick getting approval to use it's northern runway for normal operations. It will be a great economic asset for the local...
Read more
-
Human caused climate change is causing harm to people and environment. A second runway will increase flights and therefore CO2 emitted. I understand that this could be an additional 1.5 MTPA of CO2....
Read more
-
Expanding the capacity of Gatwick Airport would increase its contribution to the climate emergency and, hence, reduce the sustainability of the local, national and international economies, damaging...
Read more
-
No to extending more air traffic because …… Air traffic control can’t cope with existing air traffic Living under a flight path means continuous air traffic night & day Congestion on road routes into...
Read more
-
We oppose the second runway at Gatwick. We are already suffering noise pollution from the airport which is disturbing our daily lives both during the day and at night which is affecting our sleep.
-
At a time when we should be cutting back on pollution shouldn't we be discouraging expansion over such a populated area. The noise level has increased over Crawley and surrounding are and this will...
Read more
-
It’s about time Gatwick had a second runway, I fully support the project. Why my local council HDC would object makes zero sense.
-
This will be an asset to the south of England and I hope the go ahead is given
-
I support the changes only if action is taken to reduce overcrowding in trains that pass through Gatwick Airport station. Southern have withdrawn services and reduced the length of trains and services...
Read more
-
I am happy for the plans to go ahead
-
I object to the proposed use if the e.ergency to way for routine flights, on the grounds of noise,safety, environmental impact and lack of sustainability.
-
Flying and driving reductions must happen ASAP. Extremely difficult to do, but what alternatives does the world have ? NOT making any more provisions for more flights would be a significant start....
Read more
-
SUPPORT!
-
Looking forward for Northern runway
-
To whom it may concern sir/madam, Applicant reference: TR020005 I do confirm this is my property I am extremely glad you have extended the date for our views to be heard. I had invested in the...
Read more
-
Concerns about increased noise, air pollution regarding the Gatwick expansion especially to the built up area of Pound Hill and local areas.
-
In favour of the project
-
I support the project as this will bring additional employment to the area as well as increased revenue.
-
Expansion of Gatwick would significantly increase aircraft noise both for those living near the airport and for those further away under flight paths. The noise envelope Gatwick has proposed is not...
Read more
-
This is totally unsustainable in terms of the environment and prevention of climate change. It would significantly affect the UKs commitment to combating climate change and sends a very wrong message....
Read more
-
Increase in noise, increase in air pollution, increase in traffic on local roads
-
I am a resident in the local area. My concerns are with regard to additional environmental impact from additional flights, additional pollution, traffic to and from the airport and noise. It is...
Read more
-
Aircraft Noise, Light Pollution harm the area around the airport not just the close environs which should be expected but even where we are 40-50miles away. The constant air traffic with large and...
Read more
-
My view is that a second runway can improve the efficiency of the airport and thereby assisting the local environment with less planes standing on the runway and flying in the stack over the region.
-
Having worked for Virgin Atlantic for 13 years it is important we stay updated as a 1st world country & infrastructure. This would also relieve LHR of traffic etc we therefore need the additional...
Read more