Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
Worried about noise increase over our property because of increased number of flights Negative impact on property value as current flights are audible inside and in garden but less consistent at the...
Read more
-
Good idea
-
I want to register my interest because I was born in Crawley and 10 of those years I spent being a homeowner in Langley Green very close to the current runway. I'm (redacted) so is my Daughter, when...
Read more
-
The use of the safety runway is not an acceptable option. 1) it is there to be used in emergency and if being used regularly will not so easily be accessed in an emergency 2) the original application...
Read more
-
I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not...
Read more
-
Increased noise. Increased noise at night and early mornings. Concentrated flight paths. Increased pollution. Crawley / Copthorne has a very high level. Road infrastructure needs expanding urgently:...
Read more
-
I am not in favour of the 2nd runway as a result of the increased air and noise pollution in the local area.
-
I object strongly to this proposal because of the effect on UKs contribution to the climate crisis. The increase in flights will have huge impact on noise pollution, large increase in greenhouse gases...
Read more
-
Nothing has changed since Gatwick was turned down in favour of Heathrow expansion by the Airport Commission in 2015. Gatwick sits on a single arterial road (M23) and a single railway line that can’t...
Read more
-
Positive for the area with minimal cost and disturbances
-
night flights noise polution airspace and flight paths hammering specific areas not broadly distributed Reconfiguring, moving, significantly increasing size, altering other access and taxiways is not...
Read more
-
Please allow the use of the additional runway it will be amazing for the local area, more investment more jobs more of everything good
-
Proposed project would be a good idea and create additional jobs at Gatwick and the local community
-
I’m concerned about the environmental impacts and damage of this project.
-
Use the Northern Runway to minimise unnecessary disruption
-
A second runway at Gatwick will increase air and noise pollution in the local area and will be detrimental to a net zero policy
-
I am concern about the increase of carbon emission and of the air and noise pollution this extension will cause. I am questioning the need of increasing airports capacity in the context of the climate...
Read more
-
The main issue is, given that more air travel capacity is needed for south east England, where is the most suitable location. Heathrow is certainly not a good location - for two main reasons: first,...
Read more
-
In general happy for use of the additional runway. Some environmental concerns. Noise pollution and air pollution with the inevitable increase in flights Good opportunity for jobs in the area will...
Read more
-
Infrastructure for additional traffic is not in place. Already have huge queues to cross at Dartford and the Blackwall Tunnel. Flight pass expansion and rerouting also detrimental.
-
The already increased fumes and noise will get even worse and make using outside spaces virtually impossible for any form of socialisation. The increased traffic on the local small country lanes used...
Read more
-
I fully support the project to increase Gatwick’s capacity and boost the local economy
-
Gatwick Airport needs a second run way. It will be good for local area, jobs and the economy.
-
I am concerned about the increasing amount of noise from not only more flights, but also aircraft waiting for take-off, more traffic and illegally parked taxis. I am concerned about the increasing...
Read more
-
I support the extension at Gatwick. West Sussex and local area really needs more work opportunities for local people in skilled and semiskilled professions.