Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 4026 to 4050 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Nicholas John Metcalf

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway for may reasons including but not limited to its a new runway and not a development of an existing runway; and Policy has been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Ninel Joann Wiseman

    The impact of aircraft noise is already unacceptably high and impairs the quality of life of many people. Another full-time runway would mean that the current level of noise will go from being... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Paul Hinton

    This runway is not needed and will negatively impact this area in many ways. Local residents voices are being ignored. Gatwick management are also abusing the planning process as this is a new runway.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Penshurst Place Estate (Penshurst Place Estate)

    Concern over a potential 70% increase in runway use; increased overhead concentration of flights; increase in noise pollution; increase in night flights; lack of regulation or government oversight.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Sue Rose

    We are already concerned by noise from the current flight paths and would wish to be reassured that any airport expansion DOES NOT increase this noise nuisance and make it unliveable in our home.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Thomas Barrett

    Environmental Impact: With no clear realistic path for a more sustainable aviation fuel knowingly adding tonnes more CO2 from 100,000 more flights a year seems crazy. Noise Impact: In Leigh, Surrey we... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Trevor Martin

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway not a development of an existing runway Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Victor Porter

    The greatly increased number and frequency of low-flying flights arriving over Billingshurst into Gatwick directly overhead of the homes of a dense and rapidly increasing population already impacts... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • William Kirkham

    Aircraft on approach to London Gatwick landing Easterley very noisy. In summer continuous traffic all day and night. Very hard to sleep at night due to aircraft noise at night and early hours of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 4 October 2023

  • Alexander Donald Bone

    I am opposed to any expansion of activities at Gatwick Airport on the grounds of increased noise from planes particularly at night which already is at unacceptable levels and the increase in emissions... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Anne Cross

    we are in a climate and ecological emergency. increase flying is not conducive to such an emergency. residents in my division do not want the increased pollution, noise and disruption of increased... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Anne Slatter

    The additional volume of flights will impact properties in the RH5 area badly. Prior to the new flightpaths being used RH5 (South Holmwood) had much less flights. The current flights over this area... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Annette Patricia Day

    Air quality, congestion and increased noise were all cited as objections during the original consultation which was supported by the area's vast majority of residents, businesses and MPs. In my... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • C Morris

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – the Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an application for a new runway which does... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Caroline Marguerite Hutt

    Noise pollution I’ve Tunbridge wells

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Cathy Barclay

    Night flights have a significant impact on my sleep patterns particularly early morning and in the summer and I should like to see them banned. Any increase in current levels will be disastrous. Local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Chris Sherwin

    Against the backdrop of climate change that is broadly accepted as being caused by human activities, in particular the burning of fossil fuels, and the fact that these emissions are significantly more... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Clive Cobie

    I’ve been living in these ancient woodland for twenty three years, the flight noise has gotten worse over the years, I am very concerned about the flight emissions as I have noticed a lot less... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • David Knevett

    The infrastructure around Gatwick is already under strain - the railway line, M23, A23 and the smaller feeder roads are already stressed. Crawley has a shortage of reasonably priced housing and little... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Dennis Upfold

    I oppose this Gatwick Airport application for a northern runway because it is a new runway – Policy has been misinterpreted by the applicant as this is an applicant for a new runway which does not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Dorking Climate Emergency (Dorking Climate Emergency)

    1. Net zero will obviously not be reached in aviation by 2050 and this is a further step away from our legally binding target. 2. Despite the low percentage of people who fly, the industry is heavily... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • G.M.Bloor

    Additional noise levels, at present we cannot have the doors or windows open due to noise levels blocking out listening to tv or radio, this was not the case when we moved here 40 years ago when the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Gary Swindle

    This proposed project is extremely damaging to the environment and to the health of the people of south east England. The pollution, carbon emissions, greenhouse gasses and noise should not be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Georgia Pritchard

    We object to the airport expansion as this will have a huge increase in noise pollution and carbon emissions impacting greatly on the environment, wildlife and climate change in a time which we need... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023

  • Ian Campbell

    I feel moved to record my objection to this application as: - The is a NEW runway and should be treated as such in the planning process. LHR were chosen for airport expansion not LGW - the Gov't never... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 3 October 2023