Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.
-
I’m against the proposal. Local infrastructure and roads do not have capacity for more traffic. The countryside around the western and southwestern side has no major roads to carry extra traffic. The...
Read more
-
It’s good for people living and working around
-
Introduction The Surrey Climate Commission is an independent body with the role of supporting and guiding the transition of Surrey to a carbon neutral future. This document accompanies the...
Read more
-
Writing as Chair of a Surrey-wide organisation that supports many voluntary partners across the county, I know that a lot of those are working with people who are either employed directly by Gatwick...
Read more
-
I strongly object to the proposed new runway at Gatwick airport. 1. Aircraft noise from the existing runway has noticeably worsened over the past few years and blights the lives of those who live...
Read more
-
As we are situated so near to Gatwick Airport we are already on blighted land, so proposal of extending the emergency runway is just an added nightmare. The ‘over flights’ we suffer from when landings...
Read more
-
I am against the expansion of Gatwick airport because we already suffer a great deal from aircraft noise in the local area, including frequent flights directly over our house. I am also concerned...
Read more
-
The already increasing fumes and noise will get even worse and make using outside spaces impossible for any form of socialisation as the noise from the planes forces you to stop talking as its too...
Read more
-
I do not believe this is the right decision for our area. I oppose this Gatwick northern runway application. Inunderstand that it will help jobs and Gatwick to grow. However, the infrastructure of the...
Read more
-
It is good for the economy
-
I am hugely concerned about the increase in carbon and noise pollution that this would cause. My area is already above WHO recommended levels of air toxicity and I’m especially worried for vulnerable...
Read more
-
Noise and polution
-
I think this will be good for the local and wider economy. It will also reduce the current delays experienced during peak periods
-
1. Gatwick claims that that many thousands of new jobs will be created and presents this as an advantage. On the contrary, it will impact negatively. There is already a severe shortage of housing in...
Read more
-
Flight Path and Flight Times
-
We lie under the landing flight path for the prevailing westerly wind conditions. During summer weekends flights start at 0630 and continue at up to every 2-3 minute intervals through til late. We...
Read more
-
I object to this for environmental reasons and the noise impact it will have on my home.
-
Great idea
-
I live in Redhill. I don't see why this is required.
-
I support the use of the emergency runway being used as a second full time runway.
-
I think is a good idea as it will generate business for the town
-
I am concerned about flight paths and noise. A second runway will increase the number of aircraft forcing new flight paths over the countryside and communities who already have to deal with flights...
Read more
-
I live in (Redacted) which is a rural location in an area of outstanding natural beauty. My home is impacted by flights arriving and departing from Gatwick airport. In the operation of Gatwick airport...
Read more
-
I’m ok with Gatwick new plans for growing the number of flights and be able to use the second runaway.
-
This is a terrible idea. The environmental impact of further air travel is terrible. The impact on the local area, the carbon footprint of all the concrete. This is terrible.