Filter

Gatwick Airport Northern Runway

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 151 to 175 of 4813 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Laura Larkin

    I live under the flight path close to Gatwick, we moved in in 2015 and at that point the planes were not an issue - in the past few months planes have got closer to over our house and the noise is so... Read more

  • Martin Robinson

    Night flights between 11 pm and 6am. Aircraft noise pollution. Concentrated flight patterns.

  • Michael Ryan

    Main objection is the constant noise that has already happened and will be worse with planes now flying directly over my house. The flight path which was moved over (redacted) a few years back causes... Read more

  • Michelle Watson

    The main objection would be the air pollution and noise distru ruin. These plane are frequent enough and so low and loud it disturbs my piece

  • Nick Parker

    My home has become under the departure flight path within the past 8 years. The approval of an additional runway, to sidestep full plannng and enquiry, will, I have no doubt lead to an increase in... Read more

  • Paul Haynes

    I most definitely oppose the development of the second runway in particular - the increase in aircraft noise, the impact on climate change, the devaluing of my home, the destruction of rural life, the... Read more

  • Paul Jordan

    I consider that moving air traffic movements further North is bringing the dangers involved with aircraft movements overhead much closer to adjacent built up areas. The option to extend to the South... Read more

  • Paul Roberts

    I oppose the reassignment of the 2nd runway due to increase in aircraft noise, the huge impact on climate change, the reduction of wellbeing through increase in aircraft movements and the decline in... Read more

  • Paul Taylor-Burr

    I am very concerned about the ufp ( ultra fine particles) uptick that will inevitably rise causing a further deterioration of health in & around Crawley & mixing car fumes & pollution will produce... Read more

  • Peter Bridle

    Irreversible destruction of one of the most beautiful rural countryside areas in England for the expansion of an airport with limited accessibility for travellers.

  • Peter Collis

    I am concerned that, if the emergency runway at Gatwick is established as a second runway, it will damage the environment as well as increasing noise disturbance for the residents in this part of... Read more

  • Roger Alan Hood

    Substantial and destructive noise, road vehicle movements and air polution increases as a direct result of expansion. No mitigations possible.

  • Roland Allen

    I am firmly against an additional runway at Gatwick as it will severely impact on the quality of my family’s life, close as we are to the airport. I also have no confidence in Gatwick Airport Ltd to... Read more

  • Sarah Leggett

    I am a local resident, already severely impacted by noise from the airport, in terms of regular sleep disturbance, inability to entertain friends/family outside, thus reducing opportunities to... Read more

  • Shaun Breeze

    I don’t want the emergency runway conversion to go ahead, we already have enough air traffic! Noise is my issue. Bad enough as it is being on the flight path, be even worse with the extra runway. I... Read more

  • Stephen Poole

    I OBJECT to the proposal to use the emergency runway on a regular basis for the following reasons: In the light of the climate emergency there should be a reduction in the number of flights, not an... Read more

  • Terry Canty

    I fully object to this project going forward as it already causes air and noise pollution, traffic and overcrowding to surrounding small towns which puts stress on local schools, doctor surgeries and... Read more

  • Timothy J Cocking

    Bringing the use of the second runway back and increasing the capacity of the airport is an excellent idea which has my support. Great for the economy of the local area and beyond.

  • Tracey Hoskin

    I live in the Village of (redacted) Surrey and the planes are not meant to fly over us they are meant to fly around us but that never happens. As I am writing this there is a plane going over me every... Read more

  • Adrian Dawn

    I already have many flights over the house , no more is needed . Also what about global warming , has this been forgot ? This is a crazy idea and must be stopped , greed greed , (redacted) every one... Read more

  • Alan Clift

    The opening of a new runway will cause excessive noise throughout the day and evening and cause more pollution from more traffic on the roads and more pollution from increased air traffic.

  • Andrew Wates

    Too much engine noise. Too narrow flight paths. Insufficient infra structure. Extra road traffic. My key concerns are Noise generation from flight path and traffic generation. Additionally,... Read more

  • Anne Davies

    This expansion of Gatwick will cause an increase of fossil fuel use both in the building and infrastructure changes as well as its capacity for increased flights. Given everything that is known... Read more

  • Anthony Thomas Brookes

    The hinterland's roads are already overloaded. It will be impossible to handle more traffic without seriously affecting the health and livelihoods of local residents.

  • Barbara Hill

    Comments - - an airport gateway south of London is key to the SE region, for intrastructure and easy accessibility of public transport, environmental factors. Having 2 runways makes the offering more... Read more