Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 1 to 25 of 38 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Tony Marsh

    I have come across a fault in the traffic assessment submitted and accepted for the DIRFT III project. That project has not developed sufficiently for the local community to 'encounter' that fault. ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Tony Marsh
    Date advice given: 13 November 2017

  • View advice to CPRE Warks

    We have received the Examiner's letter dated 13 December 2013 requesting further information and representations on DIRFT3 in the light of the Department of Transport's National Networks NPS. This let... Read more

    Enquiry from: CPRE Warks
    Date advice given: 23 December 2013

  • View advice to Horstonbridge

    Should we expect any further fees to be paid post examination and if so, how are these calculated? Is the fee below an on account payment to be increased or indeed credited, in the event that the ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Horstonbridge
    Date advice given: 9 September 2013

  • View advice to BarbyHill Archaeological Project

    With regard to your report of the meeting on 8 July 2013, I must correct an error. Your report states: "Grenville Hatton on behalf of Barby Hill Archaeological Project raised the issue of heritag... Read more

    Enquiry from: BarbyHill Archaeological Project
    Date advice given: 24 July 2013

  • View advice to Catthorpe Parish Meeting

    Query regarding submission of Relevant Representation after the deadline

    Enquiry from: Catthorpe Parish Meeting
    Date advice given: 27 June 2013

  • View advice to George Cooper

    I have received today in the post a notice of a meeting for the Daventry rail freight expansion project with Rugby Radio station. It has come to me as LRF co-ordinator at Northants Police. However I a... Read more

    Enquiry from: George Cooper
    Date advice given: 26 June 2013

  • View meeting with Daventry District Council

    A meeting with with the two local authorities and the two county councils to discuss what their role is during an NSIP application and how they can prepare for Examination

    Meeting with: Daventry District Council
    Date of meeting: 9 May 2013

  • View advice to Marrons

    Having considered both s127 and s138 of the Planning Act 2008, it is our view that both provisions only require the Secretary of State to issue a certificate if the DCO includes:- 1. A provisi... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 16 April 2013

  • View advice to Tim Allen English Heritage

    I am the main English Heritage contact for this project - do we need to formally register our interest or are we already identified on the basis of the statement of common ground / difference?

    Enquiry from: Tim Allen English Heritage
    Date advice given: 11 April 2013

  • View meeting with Marrons

    A meeting with the developer to discuss any issues arising following Acceptance and to discuss future project timescales.

    Meeting with: Marrons
    Date of meeting: 28 March 2013

  • View advice to Morag Thomson Marrons

    Please find attached the response to Marrons letter dated 19 December 2012

    Enquiry from: Morag Thomson Marrons
    Date advice given: 19 December 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    Response to Marrons e-mail dated 13 December 2012

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 17 December 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    It does not the same as my amended version but I am not suggesting that we continue the debate. Please simply note that it is not an agreed note. My clients are concerned that a further full fee ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 13 December 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    We are not needing to consult any further because we are not proposing to carry out any works in Leicestershire. A very minor alteration to the junction amendments which caused the concern has obvia... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 13 December 2012

  • View advice to Marrons Morag Thomson

    Please find attached correspondence with Marrons dated 13 December 2012

    Enquiry from: Marrons Morag Thomson
    Date advice given: 13 December 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    Confirmation of whether the Planning Inspectorate require a further application fee with the re-submission application.

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 12 December 2012

  • View meeting with Morag Thomson

    To discuss non-acceptance of the DIRFT III application and agree future actions

    Meeting with: Morag Thomson
    Date of meeting: 5 December 2012

  • View meeting with Marrons

    Correspondence submitted by Marrons regarding meeting with Planning Inspectorate 5 December 2012 on non acceptance of the application.

    Meeting with: Marrons
    Date of meeting: 5 December 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    I note from various applications recently accepted that applicants have included in their Book of Reference a Schedule listing ?Statutory Undertakers and Other Like Bodies having or possibly having a ... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 19 September 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    Under Schedule 13 of the Localism Act 2011, s38 Planning Act 2008, which makes provision for Secretary of State to prescribe the model provisions, is to be omitted. Do you have any further information... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 22 February 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    Where land is potentially subject to Special Parliamentary Procedure but is not being acquired, does it need to be included in Part 4 of the Book of Reference.

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 19 January 2012

  • View advice to Marrons

    Can a Development Consent Order remove the requirement for a licence under the Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2010, as it could have a licence under the 1994 Regulations?

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 2 December 2011

  • View meeting with Marrons

    Meeting between IPC, ProLogis and Marrons

    Meeting with: Marrons
    Date of meeting: 18 November 2011

  • View advice to Marrons

    The foot note to Article 8 of the Model Provisions (Street Works) provides that the Article should not be used in respect of trunk roads. We may be mistaken but cannot see a distinction in the New Roa... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons
    Date advice given: 16 September 2011

  • View advice to Marrons LLP

    We are looking at our draft Development Consent Order and the Model Provisions Regulations and would be grateful of the IPC's guidance on the following: The foot note to Article 5 of the Model Prov... Read more

    Enquiry from: Marrons LLP
    Date advice given: 16 September 2011