Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 326 to 350 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Mr and Mrs Harrold (Mr and Mrs Harrold) on behalf of Mr and Mrs Harrold (Mr and Mrs Harrold)

    This representation is from David Harrold and Diana Harrold, a married couple living in Stoney Stanton. We are very worried, and have serious concerns, about the proposed HNRFI development. An outline... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mr Roger Johnson

    I’m mainly concerned about the increase in traffic if the development goes ahead, as the air quality in Burbage is already affected by the high volume of traffic on the M69 and other main roads... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mrs Irene Smart

    Lack of evidence of the need of HNRFI, we are already "awash" with logistic parks, including the largest in Europe and also rail freight capacity. There will be a catastrophic impact of the 9000 HGV... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mrs Mandy Jane Motley

    There are already many under-utilised rail-freight hubs within short distance of the proposed site. The proposal only brings in the rail link after 10 years of operation, therefore I must only assume... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Mrs Susan E Adkins

    Increased traffic on road, amount of train, and amount of lorries to be parked. This will not take lorries of the road, but increase the amount in the local area. Yes the goods will be transported by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • MrsTace Luxton

    The impact this rail freight terminal will be detrimental to all residents in the surrounding villages. Shipping containers will be stored high above the tree lines for all to see. HGVS will be forced... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nadine shore

    I feel this development will be a disaster for the area. It is huge. Will significantly increase traffic to already grid locked roads in and around Burbage and Hinckley. There are often crashes on the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • National Grid Electricity Transmission plc (National Grid Electricity Transmission plc)

    Representation Withdrawn Relevant Representation of National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc in respect of the Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange DCO (the “Project”) This relevant... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • National Highways (National Highways)

    National Highways has been appointed by the Secretary of State for Transport as strategic highway company under the provisions of the Infrastructure Act 2015 as the highway authority, traffic... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Neil James Wright

    I am the District Councillor for the Fosse Stoney Cove Ward. My concerns regarding the large development are as follows, 1. Increase in local traffic 2. Rail Freight is a word used to describe this... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Neil Perry

    As a resident of Hinckley, living close to Burbage Common, I object to this proposed project in its entirety, due to several reasons: Need There is no need for a development of this size and nature in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Neil Womersley

    Main issue being the amount of traffic being introduced. All surrounding areas will suffer from thousands of vehicle movements each day. Also, the extra pollution and CO2 emissions are indefensible at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nicholas Hunter

    I am concerned about the environmental impacts - not just the loss of "green" space but also noise, light and combustion engine pollution, especially so close to a wildlife area. I am also concerned... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nicholas Kirk

    I have major concerns about traffic and loss of green space in the area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nicholas Sharp

    Needs clear separation from existing woodlands with ecologically beneficial transition zones as a buffer and Preservation of mature hedgerows. Seek to develop open wet areas for wildlife and design... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nick Cassidy

    I believe this prosed project will led to ? Destruction of the natural habitat for a huge numbers of different species – decimating valuable farm and woodland forever ? Increasing light, noise and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nicola Morriss

    I believe this new national rail freight interchange will affect the peace and calm that Burbage Common and the surrounding footpaths provide for the local community. Even though the proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nigel Bradbury

    Without significant improvements to the road infrastructure (to enhance the flow of traffic to/from the proposed rail terminal), this project will have significant negative impact on the already poor... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Noelene Sapiro

    Access and destruction of farm/common land. Will access be from M69? If so what farmland is being destroyed to accommodate this project. The destruction of common land and wildlife areas is not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Nora killeen

    I am in the middle of purchasing my new house in to Elmesthorp village .. I am worried about the impact to the environment , the ecological impact and to village life .. there is no need for a new... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Pamela Bentley

    I am against this proposal as it will not improve the area and destroy a much loved local wood, Burbage Common, with its diverse ecology. The project will massively increase traffic to the area,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Patricia McConaghy

    This project is not wanted! Our infrastructure simply can't cope with any more vehicles on the roads. It is also a major concern for the environmental impact this will have on our beloved commons, an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Paul Ainscough

    Not enough attention is being paid to the wider aspects of the Hinckley/Burbage freight terminal. This includes insufficient consideration of road capacities, schools, medical facilities and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Paul Dewes

    Totally in the wrong place for a freight depot as the local roads will not cope with the extra traffic. If we need more capacity then expand Daventry International Freight Depot which is on a mainline... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023

  • Paul Williams

    * - Consultation The consultation from Tritax-Symmetry was not adequate for me to understand the impacts on traffic volumes associated with this proposal. o I complained at the consultation event and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 22 June 2023