Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Hinckley National Rail Freight Interchange

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 1126 to 1150 of 1424 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Deborah Jane Roberts

    I have many concerns arising from this development, and, in summary, my concerns are: • Traffic • Ecology • Noise • Loss of amenity

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Helen Ruth Fletcher

    The loss of the ancient woods and ecological devastation it would cause in the current proposed location along with extreme traffic congestion on the local A5

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Hilary Jean Read

    There are other Rail Freight depots in the Midlands area and this plan is mostly road freight and limited plans for railway use. There will be a very significant impact to the local wildlife... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Jacqueline Greaves

    There will be an unacceptable increase in Heavy Goods traffic passing through Sapcote village on roads which are unsuitable for large vehicles. This is inevitable because there are frequently long... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Jonathan Chadburn

    My comments fall into 2 categories Firstly the significant environmental impact this will have on the Fosse Villages, namely Sapcote, Elmesthorpe and Stoney Stanton. This development is of a similar... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Lilian Marian Pears

    I am worried about the impact the project will have on the local areas. In particular the volume of traffic in surrounding villages and the effects on Burbage Common. Also it will destroy the view... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Louise Taylor

    Impact on the local infrastructure, Hinckley, Burbage and the surrounding area is already a busy town with heavily congested roads, which will not cope with any additional traffic. The impact of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Mike kirby

    Destruction of countryside Increase of vehicles Impacting on poor infrastructure Environmental impact Already have multiple rail freights in area

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Paul Colderick

    My main issues with this proposed are :- Light pollution at night. More noise at night and day. Build up of traffic through the village I live in. (This is already an issue during peak periods)... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Sara Wykes

    Damage to community outside space E. G. Burbage Common. Damage to existing road networks and using green belt to create additional road network. Lack of good quality jobs being created. Impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Shirley Iliffe

    The village of Burbage which is within one mile of the site and on the main road connecting to it is often choked with traffic and this extra 100 lorries a day traffic will overburden our village and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Steven Greaves

    There will be an unacceptable increase in Heavy Goods traffic passing through Sapcote village on roads which are unsuitable for large vehicles. This is inevitable because there are frequently long... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Terry Robertson

    This plan does not allow for the massive increase on the existing facilities. As it stands the current infrastructure cannot cope with the increased demands of this proposal, so therefore should not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 31 May 2023

  • Abigail Roberts

    The information we’ve seen is almost exclusively focussed on the final proposed development of the freight terminal, warehousing and transportation links. For a project that, according to statements... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • Alistair Cochrane

    I do not think this project should go ahead due to the impact that it will have on the countryside and destruction of Burbage common The area is a place of natural Beauty and as such should be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • David Bacon

    Excessive traffic and loss of green space

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • Eric John Harvey Leese

    As a resident of the village for forty years I am concerned about a. the potential noise. Even now on a still evening we can hear the Nuneaton Leicester trains. How much the greater with a train hub?... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • John Michael Walker

    I am open minded about the proposed development overall and not against it in a general sense. However, I would strongly object to it proceeding unless it was an absolute condition that a new road be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • John palmer

    Unnecessary and unwanted. Need not proven.Will be disastrous for wildlife and air quality as well as local residents Roads will not cope eg m69 a5 a47.. Narborough rail crossing is already disruptive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • Nikolaos Efstathiou

    I object to this project. The infrastructure is not adequate to support this project. Vibrations by passing trains are unsettling and they are more likely to increase by heavy freight trains. Cracks... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • Oliver Ziegler

    The information we’ve seen is almost exclusively focussed on the final proposed development of the freight terminal, warehousing and transportation links. For a project that, according to statements... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • Richard Duplock

    I own a property in Hinckley and grew up in the town. The proposed development of the area outside of Hinckley, Burbage and surrounding villages would be devastating for local residents as well as the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 May 2023

  • Kenneth Vogl

    The proposed project will cause significant pollution whilst under construction and going forward with the significant increase in both lorries and cars accessing the site. The position of the site... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 May 2023

  • Louisa Sando-Patel

    I live and work less than a mile away from Burbage Common and I can hear trains regularly, which means even at this distance the freight trains will be noticeable. The thousands of HGV movements will... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 May 2023

  • Mr Andrew Stevens

    Air quality, the impact on traffic and delays on the current rail travel, as the freight will impact on local services and crossings. 45mins to a hour closures!!! Has full risk of flooding been... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 May 2023