Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 51 to 75 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Tinch Alison Suzanne Dewhurst Minter

    The main issues and impacts are on the general wellbeing of local residents, including wild life, and the huge disruption this project will cause to the area.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Vistry Group (Vistry Group)

    In assessing the proposals, the Planning Inspectorate, and in turn the Secretary of State, must be satisfied that the impacts of the proposals have been adequately assessed and the weight attributed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Boyer (Boyer) on behalf of Waterbeach Development Company LLP (Waterbeach Development Company LLP)

    Cambridge waste water treatment plant relocation DCO (ref: WW010003): Initial outline representations on behalf of: Waterbeach Development Company (WDC) as promoter and Joseph Martin, Kier Petherick... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Waterbeach Parish Council (Waterbeach Parish Council)

    Waterbeach Parish Council (WPC) strongly object to Anglian Water's proposal to relocate Milton WWTP from an industrial brownfield site to Honey Hill in the Cambridge Green Belt. The Milton site has... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • William Neale

    - I don't deem this a national infrastructure project as the only reason the sewage plant is looking to relocate is because they have sold the land to allow a flat development. The current location... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Zoe Skelding

    I strongly object to this application; I consider the main issues and impacts to be: • Negative impact on the conservation areas of Fen Ditton and Horningsea • Building on Green Belt is contrary to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Alan Duffy

    At over £200 million pounds, this is a disgraceful waste of taxpayers money on a project that does not need to happen. The existing waste water plant has been upgraded and will be suitable for many... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Deborah Balm

    The present sewerage works is more than adequate for the next 20 years. As residents we even paid a supplement after the list time the sewerage works was proposed to move to Honey Hill to improve the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Dina Archer

    Under no circumstances should this project be relocated to Honey Hill. The destruction of wildlife can never be replaced. For what? To make way for housing. If it does have to be moved surely, the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Dr Donald Fleet

    Since we have been told there is no technical need to re-build the swage works, I object to its relocation onto productive green-belt land over a chalk aquifer.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • EarthQuakers (EarthQuakers)

    Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation CWWTPR 17th July2023 Save Honey Hill EarthQuakers strongly object to the relocation 1.5 km east of current Cowley/Milton Road location, with tunnel... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Elizabeth Cotton

    Project: Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Applicant: Anglian Water Services Limited Relevant Representation of Ms Elizabeth Cotton of [REDACTED] Dear Sir/Madam, My representation is in three... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Elizabeth Harrison

    The Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation: I strongly object to the proposed relocation of the sewage works to the Honey Hill green belt area. Our green belt is an invaluable asset that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Emily Williams

    I object to the Anglian Water (AW) application for a Development Consent Order to relocate the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant to the area between Horningsea, Fen Ditton and Stow Cum Quy, known... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Emma Hodson

    My main concerns relate to: 1) the destruction of green belt land and severe negative impact on sites of special scientific interest at Qui Fen and Wicken Fen, along with the ancient footpaths that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Fiona Orme

    1. The carbon cost of building a new sewage works at Honey Hill and decommissioning the old is far too high and goes against government guidelines. I strongly object to relocation of sewage works... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Francesca Elizabeth Giove

    I am objecting to the proposed relocation of Cambridge’s Water Treatment Plant for the reasons stated below: I have concerns regarding the impact on the naturally occurring wildlife, including the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Frederick William Hyde

    Dear Sirs I am writing to object to the proposed relocation of the Milton WWTP. I have family connections to the area. My father was raised in Barton, Cambridgeshire and my aunt lives at [Redacted]. I... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Bidwells (Bidwells) on behalf of Gonville & Caius (Gonville & Caius)

    Rep 1 – Scheme design Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge (‘The College’) is concerned by the design of the scheme and lack of detailed rationale for elements of its design. We believe the proposed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Grant Otto

    There is no operational reason to build a new treatment works. Anglia water should instead focus on their regulatory, social and environmental responsibilities to halt all outflows and minimize... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Hazel Smith

    I am pleased to see the proposal before you for relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant. Anglian Water have consulted widely in our parish and went through a rigorous site selection... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Hon Hill

    Key Points covering: * ‘Carbon calculations’ analysis * Environmental Aspects * Economic Aspects * Social Aspects * No need for this WTTP move: the ‘do nothing’ much better alternative

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Horningsea Parish Council (Horningsea Parish Council)

    Horningsea Parish Council (HPC) Registration as an Interested Party and initial Comments on the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation HPC would like to register as an Interested Party and... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Ian Gilder

    I am a long-standing resident of Clayhithe, Horningsea [Redacted]. From 1998 until July 2022, I was Head of Planning at ERM, a leading planning and environmental consultancy. I have had extensive... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Jen Nì Dèasunaìgh

    The relocation plan for arable land is unacceptable, they should not be allowed to build on green belt land. Especially with the rising population how do we feed ourselves? Without importing food that... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023