Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 301 to 309 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Charilaos Antoniou Zavros

    The proposed location will create more problems and unnecessary expense. There are very few green/nature places left near Cambridge.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • David Willis

    I understand the need for a new sewer but if the old one is still capable to be use then leave it where it is. No need for the place to be dug up and changed Causing problems all over the place.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • HELEN FRANCES SANTILLY

    To build on Agricultural green belt is not in keeping with national or local planning policy. This project is not of national importance and should not be allowed on this beautiful greenbelt which... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Helen Seamarks

    I object Anglian Water misled the community on need within the consultation. Greenbelt ; Cambridge one of a few Greenbelt areas still in place ; the Greenbelt is great for animals such as Roe Deer,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Maibritt Shah

    There is no reason to relocate the waste treatment plant, and certainly none to move it to a green belt site closer to habitation.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Nigel Seamarks

    Anglian Water misled the public during the consultation. Anglian Water stated their was a capacity requirement; and the Capacity requirement was a National Infrastructure requirement. This is not the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Rachel King

    The relocation of the sewage works will be detrimental to my families health. The increase HGV in traffic will make it unsafe to commute by bike to school and work, as we currently do. The increase in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • Rodney Wythe

    We run our accountancy practice as a business, whereby expenditure is made only when its necessary and affordable, and there is a continuous monitoring of the need to ensure there is enough income... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023

  • The Starkie Family (The Starkie Family) on behalf of The Starkie Family (The Starkie Family)

    Starkie Family Objections • Selection of the site at Honey Hill failed to consider that the area is agricultural land in Green Belt: its use for the proposed development is contrary to local and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 June 2023