Filter
Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant Relocation

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 251 to 275 of 309 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Tracy Rolls

    Ruin environment Traffic pollution Wildlufe

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Tristram Riley-Smith

    Introduction. I am a long-term resident of Fen Ditton (30 years). My home is closer to the existing Waste Recycling Centre (WRC) at Cowley Rd than the proposed site on Honey Hill. The prevailing wind... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Ursula stubbings

    I am a frequent visitor to the proposed relocation site and the area is valued for its unspoilt nature. The relocation of the current sewage works to Honey Hill is completely unnecessary. The Milton... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 18 July 2023

  • Alison Mary Day

    I do not agree with the proposal to move the sewage treatment works to a new site at Honey Hill. Building on the Green belt is contrary to national and local planning policy. The area around Fen... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Anthony John Booth

    This is an anachronistic and unnecessary development for a number of reasons: 1. This is a dash to cash in with income from land value uplift and 227 millions of public finance, before water... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Baroness Janet Cohen of Pimlico

    I object to Anglian Water’s application for a new Waste Water Treatment Plant at Honey Hill and ask the Inspector to reject it on grounds set out below. Background Anglian Water’s proposal is not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Cambridge City Council (Cambridge City Council)

    Relevant Representation of Cambridge City Council INTRODUCTION 1. The following relevant representation is made on behalf of Cambridge City Council only who hereafter are referred to as the City... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Cambridgeshire County Council (Cambridgeshire County Council)

    Cambridgeshire County Council Relevant Representations have been emailed to the case team. Topic areas include: Agricultural Land and Soils, Biodiversity, Carbon, Health, Historic Environment, Land... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Catherine Kassam

    I strongly object to the proposed relocation of Cambridge Waste Water Treatment , 1.5 km east of current Cowley/Milton Road location, to Honey Hill, with a tunnel under the Cam, for £227 million of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Chris Lindley

    I am a resident of Horningsea, a parent, a parent governor [Redacted] and a member of the Save Honey Hill campaign group (although these comments are in a personal capacity). [Redacted]?I object most... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Chris Smith

    I am concerned about the information presented within Appendix 8.7:Bat Technical, in particular: 1. The low level of attempted survey effort for the transect surveys as only three repeats, given the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Christopher Buchdahl

    There is now a real risk that global warming may run faster than projected. The old site is actually far better protected from the risk of flooding and contamination/pollution of nearby ditches, many... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Christopher John Levings

    The current treatment works at Milton have been poorly operated for the past 30 years, managed would be an incorrect use of the word The couldn't care less finger in the air attitude of the operator... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Claudia Goodbrand

    I don’t think the relocation of the sewage works is at all necessary. There is no operational need. The only reason for moving the sewage works is the proposed house development on the existing sewage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • David Jeffrey Seilly

    I object to the relocation of Cambridge Treatment Sewage works from Milton to the new location on arable farmland between Fen Ditton, Horningsea and Stow Cum Quy. There is no operational need to move... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Dodie Carter

    I am totally opposed to the proposed move of the sewage works from down the road in Milton to Honey Hill. It seems to me that the reasons are dubious to say the least and that there may well be a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Dr Mark Geoffrey Harrison

    The proposed relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant is not operationally necessary because the existing site at Cowley Road was recently upgraded to serve for at least another 25... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Emily McKaylin

    The proposed project to relocate a perfectly functional sewage works from its current site in Cambridge to the green belt raises several concerns regarding the impact on the local environment,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Emma Russell

    I believe there are multiple compelling reasons for the sewage works not to be relocated. Firstly, building on green belt land is contrary to national and local planning policies. The current sewage... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Environment Agency (Environment Agency)

    Please find enclosed the Relevant Representation on behalf of the Environment Agency in relation to the above application for a Development Consent Order (DCO). The Environment Agency’s Role We are a... Read more

    Submitted by: Other statutory consultees
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Eva Dangerfield

    I object to the proposed relocation of the Cambridge Waste Water Treatment Plant for the reasons raised below: - There is no operational need to move the sewage works. Anglian Water have confirmed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Fen Ditton Parish Council (Fen Ditton Parish Council)

    Fen Ditton Parish Council ('FDPC') wish to register with the Planning Inspectorate in relation to Anglian Water’s CWWTPR proposals. We oppose the selection of Site 3 at Honey Hill for a new AWS... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Gareth Williamson

    The existing facilities are fit for purpose, having recently been upgraded thus there is no functional requirement that justifies the relocation project. The Honey Hill site is prime greenbelt, home... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Gemma Phillips

    • I am objecting to the proposal to relocate the sewage works to Honey Hill. • Living on the Farm we will be directly impacted by the sewage works relocating. • Building on Green Belt is contrary to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023

  • Graham Cone

    I have concerns regarding the following: The new site location being greenbelt with the current site having no operational need to be relocated The cost of the move to the taxpayer through the housing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 19 July 2023