Rookery South Energy from Waste Generating Station

Section 51 advice

The list below includes a record of advice we have provided for this project.

There is a statutory duty, under section 51 of the Planning Act 2008, around an application or potential application. This includes recording the name of the person who requested advice and the advice given. This information has to be made publicly available.

Search advice

Search by key words or the name of person the advice was given to.

Showing 26 to 50 of 57 documents, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • View advice to Joan Hawkes

    Ms Hawkes has kept the IPC informed of correspondence between her, Covanta and DCLG. In order for views on a particular scheme to be put forward to the Examining authority, interested parties must... Read more

  • View advice to MMAG

    Enquirer asked why he hasn't been invited to Rookery South Site Visit and would like to know who will be attending. He works alongside Hugh Roberts (MMAG) who has been invited.

  • View advice to Andrew Evans

    I am writing to you on behalf of Evans & Son as we are potential interested parties in the Coventa scheme. We have been approached by Coventa's agents, as we own land along their proposed cable... Read more

  • View advice to Environment Agency

    was wondering if you can help me I am trying to find the statement of common ground for the current IPC application at Rookery South Pit, Near Stewartby, Bedfordshire this is for a generating station... Read more

  • View meeting with Central Bedfordshire Council

    To discuss arrangements for an IPC Stakeholder Outreach Meeting in connections with the proposed waste to energy power station at Rookery South. Discussion of other matters relevant to the... Read more

  • View advice to Beds' Councils Planning Consort'

    Queries relating to the examination process and post decision enforcement.

  • View advice to English-Heritage

    English Heritage confirmed they have read through the notification letters and have queries regarding the issue-specific hearings. 1. How likely would it be for the examining authority to decide... Read more

  • View advice to Parish Council Joint Signatories

    Questions asked in relation to the forthcoming preliminary meeting for the application at Rookery South.

  • View advice to Hertsmere Borough Council

    Hertsmere Borough Council called and requested confirmation on their written representation. Two representations have been submitted; one electronically and one via hard copy, both received by the... Read more

  • View advice to Quantum PR

    Asked if the meeting note sent round with regards to a conference call made between All Smart, Quantum and the IPC could be distributed to those who manage the Park Inn Hotel (location from... Read more

  • View advice to CPRE

    Asked when the preliminary meeting for the Rookery South proposal was likely to take place and how they will have an opportunity to be heard at the event.

  • View advice to Natural England

    Mr Mould asked whether statutory consultees are registered as interested parties and whether a statutory consultee has to make representations on the prescribed form online.

  • View advice to DLA Piper

    Providing supplementary information following the Commission's acceptance of an application for development consent.

  • View advice to DLA Piper

    http://infrastructure.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/101026_En010011_DLAPiper_Letter_FurtherApplicationinfo.pdf

  • View meeting with Central Bedfordshire and Bedford Borough Council

    To discuss general procedural matters in relation to the development consent examination process.

  • View advice to Rio D'souza

    The Highways Agency (HA) is responding on line, regarding compulsory acquisition of land. However I believe the HA should for completeness respond to the application with reference development... Read more

  • View advice to British Horse Society (Bedford)

    Thank you for sending your letter of the 13th October regarding the process for registering to have a say regarding the above application. Due to work commitments, I am unable to attend any of the... Read more

  • View advice to Ruth & Steve Rowse

    I wish to submit an online representation regarding the above project. It states in the form that the submission should not contain ?Material about the merits of policy set out in a national policy... Read more

  • View advice to Marston Vale Trust

    Darren Woodward called from the Marston Vale Trust and requested information on the process for registering as an interested party and the deadline for submissions.

  • View advice to Elaine Dear

    Thank you for sending your letter of the 13th October regarding the process for registering to have a say regarding the above application. Due to work commitments, I am unable to attend any of the... Read more

  • View advice to Fran Fry

    Query raised regarding the status of the National Policy Statements and what an application will be evaluated against.

  • View advice to Heloise Hartley

    I am aware that summary representations have to be submitted by 19 November but am unclear when the more detailed representations would need to be submitted. I need to give my client who is looking to... Read more

  • View advice to Benjamin Dove-Seymour

    The following advice follows a telephone conversation with DLA Piper in regard to the provision of additional information following acceptance by the Commission of an application for development... Read more

  • View advice to The Environment Agency

    As a statutory party how will the Environment Agency be made aware of the progression of an application such as Rookery South?

  • View advice to RWE

    Ms Thomas requested copies of the Rookery South EfW facility consultation report and appendicies as per section 37.