Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 276 to 300 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Mrs Cheryl Barwell

    These are the important reasons this project must not go ahead:- 1. Desecration of our lovely scenic countryside, this will destroy it including wildlife etc. 2. Flooding which is getting worse all... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Norfolk County Council (Norfolk County Council)

    Thank you for consulting Norfolk County Council, please see below the County Councils comments below that relate the East Anglia One North Offshore Windfarm S52 consultation. (a) General Comments It... Read more

    Submitted by: Local authorities
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Peter Bell

    I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application, for the following reasons 1. Cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects occurring consecutively over 12... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Peter Minta

    I wish to object to to the Scottish Power Renewables planning application for East Anglia One North. I am writing on behalf of myself and also in my role as Chairman of Saxmundham Museum. The planning... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • S N Fulford

    EN010077 Windfarm Dear Sir I am registering an interest in the above application as a resident of Friston Village. I endorse all points raised by the SASES action group without exception. Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Sally Miles

    Dear Examining Authority, Re East Anglia North One (and East Anglia Two) I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: The cumulative impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Simon Ive

    EAST ANGLIA 1 (NORTH) OFFSHORE WINDFARM RELEVANT REPRESENTATIONS. Be assured that I am not against proposals for offshore windfarms (better offshore than onshore) as part of the Governments renewable... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Stephen Clark

    • Open areas of Greenfield at Friston selected for siting substation complex the size of Wembley Stadium. Completely dominate the small village. • Unsuitability and fragility of Thorpeness Cliffs as... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Sue Westney

    Dear Examining Authority Re: East Anglia ONE North I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: • Cumulative impact on local communities of up to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Suffolk Preservation Society (Suffolk Preservation Society)

    The Suffolk Preservation Society (SPS) acknowledges the contribution that wind power will make towards the Nation’s energy needs. Notwithstanding this, SPS’s charitable objects are to protect and... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Susan Hawker

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE I wish to object to the ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: ? Cumulative impact on local communities of up to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Susan Moon

    Dear Examining Authority. RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE ( and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons... Threat to wildlife and the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Tessa Radcliffe

    I am a frequent visitor to Friston because of the wonderful landscape and the cultural offerings of SNAPE and the nearby coast at Aldeburgh. I find it absolutely shocking that a Green Energy project... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell C (Theberton and Eastbridge Action Group on Sizewell C)

    We are concerned regarding the potential cumulative impacts of construction HGV and other associated traffic on the B1122, from its junction with the A12 to Lovers Lane in Leiston, from: • The current... Read more

    Submitted by: Non-statutory organisations
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Theberton and Eastbridge Parish Council (Theberton and Eastbridge Parish Council)

    The Parish Council is concerned regarding the potential cumulative impacts of construction HGV and other associated traffic on the B1122, from its junction with the A12 to Lovers Lane in Leiston,... Read more

    Submitted by: Parish councils
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Theresa Tollemache

    Use of unspoiled countryside with pipeline access over AONB land is wholly unacceptable. The substation complexes each the size of Wembley Stadium are dangerously close to a small picturesque village... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • WG Fishwick

    Landing of cables to for these multiple projects on a area of outstanding beauty and fragility totally unsuitable. Planned multiple years of disruption Friston as a small village to be blighted and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Will Horton-Fawkes

    Scottish Power EA1N Proposal We support the representations of SASES and Friston Parish Council And I object to:- Future expansion beyond the current proposal and timings of work i.e. ongoing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • William Bloomfield

    Dear Examining authority, I wish to object this scottish power renewables planning application on the grounds that: it will be a huge disruption to local wildlife inc. the extremely fragile cliffs at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 20 January 2020

  • Aline Mowat

    Negative impact on tourism and local business. Fragility of the cliffs at Thorpness and the destruction of ancient woodland are 2 very good reasons to rethink this. Massive negative impact on main... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Andrea Smith

    Four years ago I bought a cottage in Friston with a view to retiring here. It is an area I have been visiting regularly for the past 40 years. It is an area known and loved for its peace and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Anthony Ball

    I am in favour of renewable energy production but the impact of schemes such as this have to be minimised on shore. I, like many other members of the public was unaware of the huge scale of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Ben Gittins

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons: - Cumulative impact on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Bridget Barclay

    Cumulative effect of up to 7 energy projects is too much on communities and the local environment. Fragility of eroding Thorpeness cliff is a danger to public and homes. One fatality about 2 years... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • C. Smith

    I would first like to say that I fully support the development of renewable sources of energy, including wind. However, I am opposed to the proposed site north of Friston village for three substations... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020