Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 526 to 550 of 878 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Aline Mowat

    Negative impact on tourism and local business. Fragility of the cliffs at Thorpness and the destruction of ancient woodland are 2 very good reasons to rethink this. Massive negative impact on main... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Andrea Smith

    Four years ago I bought a cottage in Friston with a view to retiring here. It is an area I have been visiting regularly for the past 40 years. It is an area known and loved for its peace and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Anthony Ball

    I am in favour of renewable energy production but the impact of schemes such as this have to be minimised on shore. I, like many other members of the public was unaware of the huge scale of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Ben Gittins

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons: - Cumulative impact on local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Bridget Barclay

    Cumulative effect of up to 7 energy projects is too much on communities and the local environment. Fragility of eroding Thorpeness cliff is a danger to public and homes. One fatality about 2 years... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • C. Smith

    I would first like to say that I fully support the development of renewable sources of energy, including wind. However, I am opposed to the proposed site north of Friston village for three substations... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Catherine Howard-Dobson

    Dear Examining Authority, RE: EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: 1.The cumulative impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Charles Courage

    I am objecting strongly to your proposed substation site at Friston for two SPR transformers and a further National Grid transformer on the grounds that: 1. Ruination of the countryside and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Chris Wheeler

    I support the PINS representations made by Friston Parish Council and Substation Action – Save East Suffolk and reserve the right to be allowed to speak to any or all of the points they have raised,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Christian Blackshaw MBE

    Whilst not against wind power per se, the proposed substations at Friston seem misguided when there is a clear alternative, namely the ringmain option. To desecrate AONB land for ever with the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Christopher Matthew

    Use of unspoilt countryside at Friston for substations complexes the size of Wembley stadium Substation close to a villagen liabkle to flooding 11 kilometres of cable trenches destroying... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Clare McWhirter

    As a resident in the local area I want to voice my concerns about the disruption and negative impact that I feel the plans by Scottish power are going to have on particularly the village of Friston... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • CLdN Group (CLdN Group)

    The CLdN Group operates ro-ro shipping lines between the Humber and northern European ports including Rotterdam [operated by CLdN ro-ro SA]) and Zeebrugge [operated by Cobelfret Ferries NV]. The CLdN... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Colin Westney

    Dear Examining Authority Re: East Anglia ONE North I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application, for the following reasons: • Cumulative impact on local communities of up to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • David Moon

    I would like to raise my objection to Scottish Power application for an Offshore Wind Farm (East Anglia North One) off the coast at Sizewell for the reason i list below > Unsuitabilty for the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Dorie Jackson

    I support SASES and Friston Parish Council in their submissions. Whilst totally supporting renewable energy and off shore wind farms in principle, the on shore impact MUST be taken into consideration... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Dr. C.J. Atkinson

    I wish to object to this ScottishPower Renewables planning application for the following reasons: - cumulative impact on local communities of up to 7 energy projects which are likely to run for 12 to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Francis Jasper Jacob

    To save the fragile and precious countryside and wildlife from SPR wanting to build massive substations and interconnectors Destruction of ancient woodland Local roads not suitable for the HGVs Noise... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • George lightfoot

    Damage to important wildlife areas. Negative impact local communities.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Hilary lightfoot

    I wish to object to this Scottish a power renewables for the following reasons : cumulative impact on local communities over 12 to 15 years : fragility of Thorpeness cliffs for landing cables : local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Ingrid Emsden-Fox

    Dear Examining Authority Re. EAST ANGLIA NORTH ONE (and EAST ANGLIA TWO) I wish to object to this Scottish Power Renewables planning application, for the following reasons;... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • J A K Millar

    I wish to object to the planning application from Scottish Power Renewables.....it is part of an unthought out and uncoordinated scheme for much needed power but for the following reasons misconceived... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Jack Broom

    I am very concerned that the proposed site for the terminal to connect to the power grid is located very far inland from Thorpeness to Friston in areas of outstanding natural beauty, very close to the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • James Watson

    I support SASES and Friston Parish Council in their submissions. Whilst totally supporting renewable energy and off shore wind farms in principle, the on shore impact MUST be taken into consideration... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020

  • Jean Floodgate MBE

    There are offshore alternatives to the desecration of environmentally sensitive areas. We have to consider the future. In the short term the projects will cause considerable pollution in terms of Air,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 21 January 2020