Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
North Lincolnshire Green Energy Park

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 26 to 50 of 94 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Amcotts Parish Council (Amcotts Parish Council)

    Amcotts Parish Council objects to the proposed project on the following grounds: NOISE POLLUTION There is already a longstanding issue with noise pollution from Flixborough Wharf and Flixborough... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • Jacobs UK Limited (Jacobs UK Limited) on behalf of Anglian Water Services Ltd (Anglian Water Services Ltd)

    Further to Anglian Water's submission at the scoping stage requesting consultation regarding certain matters, no progress has been made and the draft DCO as submitted with the application does not... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • Eileen Oliver

    I object to the proposed development for the following reasons. Amcotts is only 200 meters away from the proposed development. A development of this magnitude, along with proposed 24hr working would... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • Elaine Marper

    Due to the maximum permitted 500 word length this response is not an exhaustive list. There is a great deal of local public concern which should be considered regarding this application (The... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • Jotun Paints (Jotun Paints)

    Appreciated a wealth of documents, but as the upper tier COMAH site referenced in 6.2.16 of Vol 6, there appears to be only brief reference to our site with regard to risks both during construction... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • Nathaniel Heath

    The location and the nature of the proposal is not appropriate, this proposal will have a significant environmental and social impact on the surrounding area. The pollution across emissions, light... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • Philip Sleight

    The close proximity to Keadby and absolutely no notification being received. The potential gases produced and released with the distance of travel The carbon footprint caused by the imported of waste... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY (UK HEALTH SECURITY AGENCY)

    Thank you for your consultation regarding the above development. The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) welcomes the opportunity to comment on your proposals at this stage of the project. Please note... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 14 September 2022

  • enfinium Ltd (enfinium Ltd)

    enfinium Ltd would like to register as an interested party to the upcoming examination of the Lincolnshire Green Energy DCO application. We reserve our position and would like the opportunity to... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 September 2022

  • Flixborough Parish Council (Flixborough Parish Council)

    Flixborough Parish Council objects to the proposed development and give the following concerns: 1. The closed railway line is home to many native flora and fauna. It provides a natural environment for... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 September 2022

  • John Briggs

    I object to this application because of the risk to health which could be caused by dust, fumes, insects, vermin and noise during operation of the works. The close proximity to village communities on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 13 September 2022

  • Brian Oliver

    I object to the proposed development for the following reasons. Amcotts is only 200 meters away from the proposed development. A development of this magnitude, along with proposed 24hr working would... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 September 2022

  • Environment Agency (Environment Agency)

    1.0 The Environment Agency’s Role 1.1 The Environment Agency is an executive non departmental public body, established under the Environment Act 1995. 1.2 We were established to bring together... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 September 2022

  • Jeff Barker

    Concerned with the proposed application to construct and operate an industrial incinerator close to the Trent side villages in particular Gunness and I would like to hear what safeguards will be in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 12 September 2022

  • Amy-Louise Ogman

    I am submitting my objection against the proposal on a number of grounds, including: lack of need, due to overcapacity; the threat to recycling, not only in our area but nationally; inadequate... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 September 2022

  • Dawn Gray

    I disagree with the proposed green energy park. The efficiency of these parks can become diminished over time unless the infrastructure is very well maintained. I am worried that this will have a... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 September 2022

  • Nigel Rhodes

    How can this be called a green park? It is a waste plant, which will impact on the local environment.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 11 September 2022

  • Harold Homer

    The proposed development is on a designated flood plain. Does the government support development on a designated flood plain? What is the actual height of the stack? What will be the effect of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2022

  • Rajan Marwaha

    I own bellwin house land and buildings earmarked to be taken ovee to accomodate this proposed projects . I have been approached by THE DEVELOPERS AGENTS DDM Agricultural to entef negotiations for its... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 10 September 2022

  • Anthony Buccieri

    Sick and tired of this local Council killing the local vista and in turn the environment with their government backed on trend ideas, which are forced upon the local area (Keadby, Amcotts,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 September 2022

  • Peacock and Smith Ltd (Peacock and Smith Ltd) on behalf of Gleeson Regeneration Ltd (Gleeson Regeneration Ltd )

    Dear Sir/Madam WRITTEN REPRESENTATION IN RESPONSE TO NORTH LINCOLNSHIRE GREEN ENERGY PARK CONSULTATION - PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE: EN010116 GLEESON REGENERATION LTD We act on behalf of our... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 9 September 2022
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Burton upon Stather Parish Council (Burton upon Stather Parish Council)

    Burton upon Stather Parish Council objects to the proposed development and has the following concerns: 1. Few residents of Burton upon Stather (BUS) were provided with the public consultation pack in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 September 2022

  • KING Family

    My main objection to this planning application, Is reminding you that this site was historically used by a recycling company (SITA) and subsequently successfully shut down after local residents form... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 September 2022

  • Residents Against INcinerators (RAIN) (Residents Against INcinerators (RAIN))

    RAIN (Residents Against INcinerators) is a group of residents from Burton upon Stather, Flixborough, Amcotts and Dragonby who object to the proposed development and give their following concerns: 1.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 September 2022

  • Tricia Murphy

    I am opposed to the building of this on the following grounds: CONSULTATION The original radius and nominees preventing the nearest village from participating and the misinformation regarding viewing... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 8 September 2022