Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 26 to 50 of 425 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Forestry Commission (Forestry Commission)

    The Forestry Commission is the government department responsible for protecting, expanding and promoting the sustainable management of woodlands. As part of our role, we are a non-statutory consultee... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Geoff Loveman

    This representation is in support of Rampion 2 - It is important that the UK continues to pursue sources of renewable power and to move away from the use of fossil fuels which are environmentally... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Batcheller Monkhouse (Batcheller Monkhouse) on behalf of Grant Talbot and Theresa Talbot (Grant Talbot and Theresa Talbot)

    06 November 2023 Our Ref: DNB/HC/PW Dear Sirs, [REDACTED] Rampion 2 response to section 56 Notice I am writing on behalf of my client, Grant Talbot and Theresa Talbot, who own and occupy a property... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Lester Aldridge LLP (Lester Aldridge LLP) on behalf of Green Properties (Kent & Sussex) Ltd (Green Properties (Kent & Sussex) Ltd)

    RELEVANT REPRESENTATIONS Rights sought 1. Green Properties (Kent & Sussex) Ltd (“Owner”) is the freehold owner of plots 33/4, 33/22, 33/23, 33/24, 33/25, and 33/26 (“Land”), listed in Category 1 of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Gregory Neville Brownrigg

    I regularly fish the area of proposed windfarm also all spoil from trenching will move east to Worthing Shoreham areas, littlehampton fishermen will be forced to fish off Worthing and Shoreham majorly... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Hazelle Woodhurst-White

    Inappropriate site for Rampion 2 . Traffic delays for several years on a very dangerous stretch of the A272 already . I will follow up with my full online objection again, once registered herewith.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Savills UK Ltd (Savills UK Ltd) on behalf of His Grace Edward William Fitzalan-Howard, 18th Duke of Norfolk (His Grace Edward William Fitzalan-Howard, 18th Duke of Norfolk)

    Dear Sirs RE: The Duke of Norfolk, Angmering Park Farms LLP, Trustees of The Bernard 16th Duke of Norfolk’s 1958 Settlement Reserve Fund, Trustees of The Angmering Park Estate Trust, The Personal... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Historic England (Historic England)

    Introduction Historic England is the Government’s statutory adviser on the historic environment. It is our duty under the National Heritage Act 1983 to secure the preservation and enhancement of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • HJ Burt & Son (HJ Burt & Son)

    I act for a number of landowners and occupiers along the proposed cable route with land affected by the scheme or access to it

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Joanne Higgins

    Draft Development Control Order (DCO) EN010117” and the supplementary Notice of Acceptance of a DCO Plot Number 32/13. I object to the above DCO. I live at [REDACTED] with my 18 month old daughter and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Keiko Ueno

    I am against the windfarms for the following reasons: • The lack of transparency, including changing the Planning Inspectorate link recently for anyone wanting to register an interest. • The impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Henry Adams LLP (Henry Adams LLP) on behalf of Keith & John Langmead, and their associated trusts & companies (Keith & John Langmead, and their associated trusts & companies)

    I hereby submit this objection on behalf of Keith and John Langmead (the "Landowners") with regard to the Rampion 2 project, specifically addressing concerns derived from the contents of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Lorraine Doris Powell

    I strongly oppose the proposal. I do not feel that the Cowfold Community have been properly consulted, no knowledge of this at all, some people had a leaflet, i certainly had nothing. In the drop in... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Lyminster and Crossbush Parish Council (Lyminster and Crossbush Parish Council)

    We understand that members of our community have previously responded to your consultation exercise yet their views appear to have been disregarded in some of the latest proposals. Namely routes... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Malcolm Gordon Morley

    I am totally against this project. It came as a complete surprise to us as no consultation was arranged . It's development by stealth. The traffic chaos and air pollution will be unbearable to local... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Margaret Powell

    I live directly on the sea front.I am very concerned about the visual impact this wind farm would have both for myself and all those living on this strip of coast. Littlehampton and Bognor Regis are... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Mark Shields

    I am against the windfarm with following reasons. • The lack of transparency, including changing the Planning Inspectorate link recently for anyone wanting to register an interest. • The impact on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Martin Keogh

    I have a carvan next to the site main concerns are dust , noise and vehicle access to the site what ans are in place to minimise these, how close will you becoming to the boundary fence next the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Member East Beach Residents Association (EBRA) - Littlehampton and Protect Coastal Sussex (PCS) (Member East Beach Residents Association (EBRA) - Littlehampton and Protect Coastal Sussex (PCS))

    I offet this Press Release by Protect Coastal Sussex as a relevant registration comment. So that it is acknowledged and taken into account by the Examination Panel and Interested Parties and is on... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Member of Protect Coastal Sussex (Member of Protect Coastal Sussex)

    Generally, when proposing a development, The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)( Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local and Local Government, 2019) Section 127 sets out the design... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Michael John Gething

    I am opposed to the Rampion 2 development. My reasons are as follows: The lack of initial consultation with the population of Cowfold. The potential impact on the village is going to impact its daily... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Michael Knight

    I love the local views to the open, natural seascape that can be currently enjoyed from the Sussex coast. They are beautiful and uplifting. If allowed, these precious views will be lost forever. There... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Michael Moorcroft

    I am very concerned at the enormous extent of the array of vast Wind Turbines as high as The Eiffel Tower. There will be no place on the West Sussex Coast that the horizon is not dominated by them by... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023

  • Mid Sussex District Council (Mid Sussex District Council)

    Mid Sussex District Council’s Relevant Representations on Rampion 2 Development Consent Order 1.0 Summary 1.1 In summary the key issues for Mid Sussex are as follows: a) This Council is supportive of... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023
    Contains attachment(s)

  • Henry Adams LLP (Henry Adams LLP) on behalf of Mr and Mrs G Woolgar (Mr and Mrs G Woolgar)

    Mr and Mrs Woolgar are landowners on the route of the cable. They object strongly to the proposed easement terms as they have disproportional consequences for the land within, and outside, of the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 6 November 2023