Skip to main content
Find a National Infrastructure Project

Beta This is a beta service - your feedback will help us to improve it

Filter
Rampion 2 Offshore Wind Farm

Relevant representations (registration comments)

Search by the person or group making the submission or the content of the submission.

Showing 251 to 275 of 425 representations, newest first.

Results per page 25 | View 50 results per page | View 100 results per page

  • Justine Maddox

    I do not support this new wind farm which is being passed off as an expansion. The machines are way too tall and will be too visible from the coast.

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Kathryn Victoria winfield

    I would like to register my concerns and extreme implications the proposed intrusion through our paddocks will have . I am an Olympic team dressage rider ,trainer and 20 national champion .I ride and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Lesley Mercer

    The disruption whilst the cables and everything else is being laid is not suitable for Climping. The inconvenience to road users, and especially the residents of Climping towards the sea, will be... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Luke Michael Davies

    I object vehemently to the proposed substation at Oakendene/Kent Steet in Cowfold. The information submitted by Rampion, ignores and omits significant information/data which gives an inaccurate and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Mole Valley District Council (Mole Valley District Council)

    1.0 Introduction 1.1 Mole Valley District Council (MVDC, or ‘the Council’) acknowledges the Secretary of State’s decision (7 September 2023) to accept for examination the application for the Rampion 2... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • PETER William BALL on behalf of Mr & Mrs BALL (Mr & Mrs BALL)

    We are gravely concerned that the proposals for Rampion 2 are very misleading to the public, as it is described as an' off shore windfarm' when it is actually an INSHORE WINDFARM . We are also worried... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Nicholas Barr

    Fantastic plans. Wind energy is clean, low maintenance and incredibly important for the reduction of reliance on fossil fuels. I live in Worthing with a sea view, I can see the existing wind farm and... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Pagham Parish Council (Pagham Parish Council)

    Members are extremely concerned by the scale of the turbines proposed under the scheme. It was noted that on p51-60 of the Rampion 2 Wind Farm Category 6: Environmental Statement Volume 3, Chapter 15:... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Lawrence Haas on behalf of Patricia King (Patricia King)

    To consider alternatives in a sufficiently robust way as is warranted on a proposed £3-4 billion investment, my comment is the Examination Authority could and should invite expert written and oral... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Paul Carugati

    Projects of this size are not in keeping with a small village. The roads in the area are overcrowded already

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Paul Lightburn

    I refer to the “Draft Development Consent Order (DCO) EN010117” and the supplementary “Notice of Acceptance of a DCO” which refers specifically to Plot Number 32/13, related to the Rampion 2 Wind Farm... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Paulette Jane Northam

    I have already submitted my thoughts on Rampion 2 during the consultation process undertaken by Rampion 2 team in 2021 and had my submission acknowledged on 21 September 2021. I understand that post... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Robert Finley

    Rampions preference to use Oakendene as their site of choice appears to have come about as a result of not communicating their proposals to the residents in good time for us to contest their decision,... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Russell cochran

    As a local councillor for Worthing borough council I fully support this proposal in its entirety We need to switch our Energy to reduce our carbon footprint NOW the quicker this is built the better. i... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Tarmac Marine Ltd (Tarmac Marine Ltd)

    Tarmac Marine owns and operates four marine aggregate dredgers that extract sands and gravels from areas of seabed offshore southern Britain, licensed by the Crown Estate and the Marine Management... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • William Davies

    Transport and Highways I strongly object to the proposed substation at Oakendene/Kent St because Rampion have failed to take account of the volume of traffic travelling along the A272 East of Cowfold... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 30 October 2023

  • Alan Sutton

    I feel Rampion did not engage adequately with Cowfold residents about the project, including it’s exact location or the impact it would have on local infrastructure, traffic, pollution etc and failed... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • CowfoldvRampion (CowfoldvRampion)

    We have submitted evidence to demonstrate that the local community of Cowfold was not consulted about the proposed substation being located at Oakendene, Cowfold. Furthermore, the decision was made... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Deborah Jane Miles

    My main concerns is the increase traffic and pollution on the A272 running from Oakedene and Cowfold. Pollution is already extremly high in this area, with increase traffic from trucks can only make... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Littlehampton Resident (Littlehampton Resident) on behalf of Edward Stratton Woodward (Edward Stratton Woodward)

    I object to the proposed Rampion 2 development. Concerns I wish to register are that many people in my community who are actually aware of what is proposed in the Application documents disagree with... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Eric Norman Smith

    Trawling has been banned up to 4 kilometers off the West Sussex Coast for 3 years now to give the ecosystem a chance to recover from the deverstating effects of inshore trawling and help the... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Geraldine Huggett

    Increased traffic causing huge chaos in and around Cowfold Destruction of habitat for newts, bats, frogs, nightingales and many other species Destruction of the village of Cowfold, turning it into an... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Hannah Russell-Smith

    I object to the proposals. I agree with the views expressed by CowfoldvRampion, our community action group, and support the evidence they will provide in Written Representations and verbally at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Isabella Russell-Smith

    I object to the proposals. I agree with the views expressed by CowfoldvRampion, our community action group, and support the evidence they will provide in Written Representations and verbally at... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023

  • Jeremy Smethurst

    I strongly object to the Rampion 2 proposals for the Oakendene substation. As a resident affected by the project, I did not know anything about it until I received a Section 42 letter in October 2022.... Read more

    Submitted by: Members of the public/businesses
    Date submitted: 29 October 2023
    Contains attachment(s)